生成式人工智能服务的光明和黑暗的全面检查:混合方法的方法

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sang-Hyeak Yoon , Sung-Byung Yang , So-Hyun Lee
{"title":"生成式人工智能服务的光明和黑暗的全面检查:混合方法的方法","authors":"Sang-Hyeak Yoon ,&nbsp;Sung-Byung Yang ,&nbsp;So-Hyun Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in generative AI (GAI), have significantly influenced society, prompting extensive discussions about their societal impact. While previous research has acknowledged both the benefits and challenges of AI, the rapid development of GAI has often proceeded without sufficient focus on actionable strategies to address potential risks and unintended consequences. Understanding both the positive and negative aspects of GAI is essential to ensure that technological progress is balanced and responsibly managed to mitigate potential risks and societal harm. This study identifies the positive and negative aspects of GAI from both public and expert viewpoints by applying a valence framework. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates joint sentiment topic (JST) modeling with the combined use of ChatGPT and expert interviews, we investigated the key positive and negative factors associated with GAI. By integrating the insights gained from these different perspectives, the study proposes strategies for the effective and responsible use of GAI. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on GAI by offering a comprehensive understanding of its implications and providing guidance for its ethical and appropriate applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101491"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive examination of the bright and dark sides of generative AI services: A mixed-methods approach\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Hyeak Yoon ,&nbsp;Sung-Byung Yang ,&nbsp;So-Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in generative AI (GAI), have significantly influenced society, prompting extensive discussions about their societal impact. While previous research has acknowledged both the benefits and challenges of AI, the rapid development of GAI has often proceeded without sufficient focus on actionable strategies to address potential risks and unintended consequences. Understanding both the positive and negative aspects of GAI is essential to ensure that technological progress is balanced and responsibly managed to mitigate potential risks and societal harm. This study identifies the positive and negative aspects of GAI from both public and expert viewpoints by applying a valence framework. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates joint sentiment topic (JST) modeling with the combined use of ChatGPT and expert interviews, we investigated the key positive and negative factors associated with GAI. By integrating the insights gained from these different perspectives, the study proposes strategies for the effective and responsible use of GAI. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on GAI by offering a comprehensive understanding of its implications and providing guidance for its ethical and appropriate applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156742232500016X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156742232500016X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的最新进展,特别是生成式人工智能(GAI),对社会产生了重大影响,引发了关于其社会影响的广泛讨论。虽然之前的研究已经承认了人工智能的好处和挑战,但人工智能的快速发展往往没有充分关注可操作的策略,以解决潜在的风险和意想不到的后果。了解GAI的积极和消极方面对于确保技术进步的平衡和负责任地管理以减轻潜在风险和社会危害至关重要。本研究通过应用效价框架,从公众和专家的角度确定GAI的积极和消极方面。采用一种混合方法,将联合情感主题(JST)建模与ChatGPT和专家访谈相结合,我们调查了与GAI相关的关键积极因素和消极因素。通过整合从这些不同角度获得的见解,本研究提出了有效和负责任地使用GAI的策略。该研究对GAI的现有知识体系做出了贡献,提供了对其含义的全面理解,并为其伦理和适当的应用提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive examination of the bright and dark sides of generative AI services: A mixed-methods approach
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in generative AI (GAI), have significantly influenced society, prompting extensive discussions about their societal impact. While previous research has acknowledged both the benefits and challenges of AI, the rapid development of GAI has often proceeded without sufficient focus on actionable strategies to address potential risks and unintended consequences. Understanding both the positive and negative aspects of GAI is essential to ensure that technological progress is balanced and responsibly managed to mitigate potential risks and societal harm. This study identifies the positive and negative aspects of GAI from both public and expert viewpoints by applying a valence framework. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates joint sentiment topic (JST) modeling with the combined use of ChatGPT and expert interviews, we investigated the key positive and negative factors associated with GAI. By integrating the insights gained from these different perspectives, the study proposes strategies for the effective and responsible use of GAI. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on GAI by offering a comprehensive understanding of its implications and providing guidance for its ethical and appropriate applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信