组织认同与组织去认同的相互关系

IF 2 4区管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Scandinavian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101389

Mette Lund Kristensen , Ingo Winkler

{"title":"组织认同与组织去认同的相互关系","authors":"Mette Lund Kristensen , Ingo Winkler","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article addresses the interrelatedness of simultaneous multi-focus organizational identification and disidentification. Studying a geographically dispersed accounting organization, we have been able to unveil the interdependent and interchanging nature of organizational (dis)identifications as an effect of the contextual conditions and changing (dis)identification sources targeted by individuals. We adopt a dialectical lens for theorizing organizational identification to understand how identification and disidentification complement each other through single-focus, multi-focus and mutual reinforcement. This means abandoning treating identification and disidentification as independent constructs. Conceptualizing them as being interdependent enables to grasp how organization members mobilize, connect and re-connect different sources and referent sources within the dynamic interplay of identification and disidentification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"Article 101389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interrelatedness of organizational identification and disidentification\",\"authors\":\"Mette Lund Kristensen , Ingo Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article addresses the interrelatedness of simultaneous multi-focus organizational identification and disidentification. Studying a geographically dispersed accounting organization, we have been able to unveil the interdependent and interchanging nature of organizational (dis)identifications as an effect of the contextual conditions and changing (dis)identification sources targeted by individuals. We adopt a dialectical lens for theorizing organizational identification to understand how identification and disidentification complement each other through single-focus, multi-focus and mutual reinforcement. This means abandoning treating identification and disidentification as independent constructs. Conceptualizing them as being interdependent enables to grasp how organization members mobilize, connect and re-connect different sources and referent sources within the dynamic interplay of identification and disidentification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522124000708\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522124000708","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了同时存在的多焦点组织认同和组织去认同的相互关系。研究一个地理上分散的会计组织，我们已经能够揭示组织（非）认同的相互依赖和交换性质，作为环境条件和个人目标的变化（非）认同来源的影响。我们采用辩证的视角对组织认同进行理论化，理解认同与去认同是如何通过单焦点、多焦点和相互强化相互补充的。这意味着放弃将认同和去认同视为独立的构念。将它们概念化为相互依赖，可以掌握组织成员如何在认同和去认同的动态相互作用中动员、连接和重新连接不同的来源和参考来源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The interrelatedness of organizational identification and disidentification

This article addresses the interrelatedness of simultaneous multi-focus organizational identification and disidentification. Studying a geographically dispersed accounting organization, we have been able to unveil the interdependent and interchanging nature of organizational (dis)identifications as an effect of the contextual conditions and changing (dis)identification sources targeted by individuals. We adopt a dialectical lens for theorizing organizational identification to understand how identification and disidentification complement each other through single-focus, multi-focus and mutual reinforcement. This means abandoning treating identification and disidentification as independent constructs. Conceptualizing them as being interdependent enables to grasp how organization members mobilize, connect and re-connect different sources and referent sources within the dynamic interplay of identification and disidentification.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Scandinavian Journal of Management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

71 days

期刊介绍： The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.