利用自然创造城市:在希腊规划基于自然的解决方案

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alice Wanner, Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider, Meike Jungnickel
{"title":"利用自然创造城市:在希腊规划基于自然的解决方案","authors":"Alice Wanner,&nbsp;Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider,&nbsp;Meike Jungnickel","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An unequal distribution of green areas across cities coupled with the vulnerability towards climate change and global warming is causing segregation between residents who profit from nature-based solutions’(NbS) health and wellbeing benefits and those who do not. Residential segregation in urban settings goes far beyond income and socio-economic factors and is also evident in questions of environmental justice, participation and power – including how and where NbS are implemented. Delving into Greek cities, this paper raises the question of whether and how engagement with urban NbS differs within cities and among their residents. By applying a survey with an integrated discrete choice experiment (N = 1002) we were able to analyze the relevance of the type of green area, the effectiveness in temperature and microdust reduction, biodiversity enhancement, time and financial payments and the importance of participatory planning processes. The latent class analysis showed that urban segregation is recognizable within the sample. By investigating the differences in ability and willingness to support urban NbS, this paper recommends how green infrastructure can be implemented in a manner which enforces a more just distribution for those who need it most.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 128731"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging nature for just cities: Planning nature-based solutions in Greece\",\"authors\":\"Alice Wanner,&nbsp;Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider,&nbsp;Meike Jungnickel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>An unequal distribution of green areas across cities coupled with the vulnerability towards climate change and global warming is causing segregation between residents who profit from nature-based solutions’(NbS) health and wellbeing benefits and those who do not. Residential segregation in urban settings goes far beyond income and socio-economic factors and is also evident in questions of environmental justice, participation and power – including how and where NbS are implemented. Delving into Greek cities, this paper raises the question of whether and how engagement with urban NbS differs within cities and among their residents. By applying a survey with an integrated discrete choice experiment (N = 1002) we were able to analyze the relevance of the type of green area, the effectiveness in temperature and microdust reduction, biodiversity enhancement, time and financial payments and the importance of participatory planning processes. The latent class analysis showed that urban segregation is recognizable within the sample. By investigating the differences in ability and willingness to support urban NbS, this paper recommends how green infrastructure can be implemented in a manner which enforces a more just distribution for those who need it most.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725000652\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725000652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市间绿地分布不均,再加上气候变化和全球变暖的脆弱性,导致从基于自然的解决方案(NbS)的健康和福祉中受益的居民和没有受益的居民之间出现了隔离。城市环境中的居住隔离远远超出了收入和社会经济因素,在环境正义、参与和权力问题上也很明显——包括国家统计局的实施方式和地点。通过对希腊城市的深入研究,本文提出了一个问题,即城市内部和居民之间对城市国家统计局的参与是否不同,以及如何不同。通过采用一项综合离散选择实验(N = 1002)的调查,我们能够分析绿地类型、降低温度和微尘的有效性、增强生物多样性、时间和财务支付以及参与式规划过程的重要性之间的相关性。潜在类别分析表明,城市隔离在样本中是可识别的。通过调查支持城市国家统计局的能力和意愿的差异,本文建议如何以一种更公平地分配给最需要它的人的方式实施绿色基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging nature for just cities: Planning nature-based solutions in Greece
An unequal distribution of green areas across cities coupled with the vulnerability towards climate change and global warming is causing segregation between residents who profit from nature-based solutions’(NbS) health and wellbeing benefits and those who do not. Residential segregation in urban settings goes far beyond income and socio-economic factors and is also evident in questions of environmental justice, participation and power – including how and where NbS are implemented. Delving into Greek cities, this paper raises the question of whether and how engagement with urban NbS differs within cities and among their residents. By applying a survey with an integrated discrete choice experiment (N = 1002) we were able to analyze the relevance of the type of green area, the effectiveness in temperature and microdust reduction, biodiversity enhancement, time and financial payments and the importance of participatory planning processes. The latent class analysis showed that urban segregation is recognizable within the sample. By investigating the differences in ability and willingness to support urban NbS, this paper recommends how green infrastructure can be implemented in a manner which enforces a more just distribution for those who need it most.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信