亚洲国家和非亚洲国家在原油价格、地缘政治风险、经济政策不确定性和外汇汇率之间的时变频率关联性是否不同?

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jin Shang , Shigeyuki Hamori
{"title":"亚洲国家和非亚洲国家在原油价格、地缘政治风险、经济政策不确定性和外汇汇率之间的时变频率关联性是否不同?","authors":"Jin Shang ,&nbsp;Shigeyuki Hamori","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper employs a time-varying frequency connectedness framework to empirically quantify differences in systemic risk dynamics between Asian and non-Asian countries. We explore the connectedness across the forex markets, crude oil market, geopolitical risk, and economic policy uncertainty, including major global crises such as the 2008 financial crisis, 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and 2022 Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Our study reveals that non-Asian countries' foreign exchange rates act as systemic risk transmitters, while Asian countries' rates are receivers. Crude oil price volatility has a stronger effect on non-Asian markets, whereas Asian markets are more sensitive to shifts in geopolitical and policy uncertainty. Short-term frequencies dominate return connectedness, while long-term frequencies drive volatility. Additionally, systemic risk from COVID-19 has more enduring effects than the 2008 crisis, while the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict appears transient. These findings offer insights for policymakers and investors for targeted risk management and policy formulations in an increasingly complex global environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 105518"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the time-varying frequency connectedness across crude oil prices, geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and foreign exchange rates different between Asian and non-Asian countries?\",\"authors\":\"Jin Shang ,&nbsp;Shigeyuki Hamori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper employs a time-varying frequency connectedness framework to empirically quantify differences in systemic risk dynamics between Asian and non-Asian countries. We explore the connectedness across the forex markets, crude oil market, geopolitical risk, and economic policy uncertainty, including major global crises such as the 2008 financial crisis, 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and 2022 Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Our study reveals that non-Asian countries' foreign exchange rates act as systemic risk transmitters, while Asian countries' rates are receivers. Crude oil price volatility has a stronger effect on non-Asian markets, whereas Asian markets are more sensitive to shifts in geopolitical and policy uncertainty. Short-term frequencies dominate return connectedness, while long-term frequencies drive volatility. Additionally, systemic risk from COVID-19 has more enduring effects than the 2008 crisis, while the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict appears transient. These findings offer insights for policymakers and investors for targeted risk management and policy formulations in an increasingly complex global environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000601\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用时变频率关联性框架,以实证方法量化亚洲国家与非亚洲国家之间系统性风险动态的差异。我们探讨了外汇市场、原油市场、地缘政治风险和经济政策不确定性之间的关联性,包括 2008 年金融危机、2020 年 COVID-19 大流行病和 2022 年俄乌冲突等重大全球危机。我们的研究表明,非亚洲国家的外汇汇率是系统性风险的传递者,而亚洲国家的汇率则是接受者。原油价格波动对非亚洲市场的影响更大,而亚洲市场对地缘政治和政策不确定性的变化更为敏感。短期频率主导着回报的关联性,而长期频率驱动着波动性。此外,与 2008 年危机相比,COVID-19 带来的系统性风险具有更持久的影响,而俄乌冲突的影响似乎是短暂的。这些发现为政策制定者和投资者在日益复杂的全球环境中进行有针对性的风险管理和政策制定提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the time-varying frequency connectedness across crude oil prices, geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and foreign exchange rates different between Asian and non-Asian countries?
This paper employs a time-varying frequency connectedness framework to empirically quantify differences in systemic risk dynamics between Asian and non-Asian countries. We explore the connectedness across the forex markets, crude oil market, geopolitical risk, and economic policy uncertainty, including major global crises such as the 2008 financial crisis, 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and 2022 Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Our study reveals that non-Asian countries' foreign exchange rates act as systemic risk transmitters, while Asian countries' rates are receivers. Crude oil price volatility has a stronger effect on non-Asian markets, whereas Asian markets are more sensitive to shifts in geopolitical and policy uncertainty. Short-term frequencies dominate return connectedness, while long-term frequencies drive volatility. Additionally, systemic risk from COVID-19 has more enduring effects than the 2008 crisis, while the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict appears transient. These findings offer insights for policymakers and investors for targeted risk management and policy formulations in an increasingly complex global environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信