Chia-Yu Li, Ling-Yun Fan, Chin-Hsien Lin, Chaur-Jong Hu and Ming-Jang Chiu*,
{"title":"超灵敏检测血浆β淀粉样蛋白不同构象","authors":"Chia-Yu Li, Ling-Yun Fan, Chin-Hsien Lin, Chaur-Jong Hu and Ming-Jang Chiu*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1087910.1021/acsomega.4c10879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1–42 (Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> were prepared. The Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. The measured levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but depend on the total amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> need to be elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 7","pages":"7256–7263 7256–7263"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasensitive Assays Detect Different Conformations of Plasma β Amyloids\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Yu Li, Ling-Yun Fan, Chin-Hsien Lin, Chaur-Jong Hu and Ming-Jang Chiu*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c1087910.1021/acsomega.4c10879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1–42 (Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> were prepared. The Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. The measured levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but depend on the total amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> need to be elucidated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"7256–7263 7256–7263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasensitive Assays Detect Different Conformations of Plasma β Amyloids
With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1–42 (Aβ1–42) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ1–42 concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ1–42 in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ1–42 but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ1–42 were prepared. The Aβ1–42 composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ1–42 concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ1–42 assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ1–42. The measured levels of Aβ1–42 are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ1–42 but depend on the total amounts of Aβ1–42. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ1–42 are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ1–42 concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ1–42 levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ1–42. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ1–42, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ1–42 need to be elucidated.
ACS OmegaChemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍:
ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.