超灵敏检测血浆β淀粉样蛋白不同构象

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chia-Yu Li, Ling-Yun Fan, Chin-Hsien Lin, Chaur-Jong Hu and Ming-Jang Chiu*, 
{"title":"超灵敏检测血浆β淀粉样蛋白不同构象","authors":"Chia-Yu Li,&nbsp;Ling-Yun Fan,&nbsp;Chin-Hsien Lin,&nbsp;Chaur-Jong Hu and Ming-Jang Chiu*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1087910.1021/acsomega.4c10879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1–42 (Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> were prepared. The Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. The measured levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but depend on the total amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> need to be elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 7","pages":"7256–7263 7256–7263"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasensitive Assays Detect Different Conformations of Plasma β Amyloids\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Yu Li,&nbsp;Ling-Yun Fan,&nbsp;Chin-Hsien Lin,&nbsp;Chaur-Jong Hu and Ming-Jang Chiu*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c1087910.1021/acsomega.4c10879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1–42 (Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> were prepared. The Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. The measured levels of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> but depend on the total amounts of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ<sub>1–42</sub>, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ<sub>1–42</sub> need to be elucidated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"7256–7263 7256–7263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着免疫磁还原法(IMR)、单分子阵列法(SIMOA)、电化学发光免疫法(ECLIA)等超灵敏技术的发展,血基淀粉样蛋白1-42 (Aβ1-42)的测定成为可能。然而,与认知功能未受损的受试者(CU)相比,阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者血浆Aβ1-42浓度的变化并不一致。本研究探讨了血浆中Aβ1 - 42不同构象不一致的可能原因。制备了Aβ1-42单体和低聚物比例相同的3种样品。Western blot分析样品中a - β1 - 42单体和低聚物的组成。用IMR和SIMOA测定相同稀释后的三种样品的a - β1 - 42浓度。三种稀释后的样品用IMR检测的Aβ1-42水平相似,而用SIOMA检测的低聚物较多的样品的水平要低得多。结果表明,IMR可以检测到Aβ1-42的单体和低聚物。测定的Aβ1-42水平与单体或低聚物Aβ1-42的比例无关,而与Aβ1-42的总量有关。在SIMOA的情况下,Aβ1-42的单体是测量的主要目标。通过比较IMR和SIMOA的血浆Aβ1-42浓度,发现IMR在AD与CU患者血浆Aβ1-42水平上的显著差异主要是由于Aβ1-42寡聚物的形成。因此,如果目标分子是Aβ1-42的单体,则SIMOA是首选的方法。尽管如此,如果目标分子应该包括单体,小的和大的低聚物,IMR将是一个最佳的考虑。在未来,低聚物Aβ1-42的比例的临床意义需要阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasensitive Assays Detect Different Conformations of Plasma β Amyloids

With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1–42 (Aβ1–42) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ1–42 concentrations in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ1–42 in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ1–42 but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ1–42 were prepared. The Aβ1–42 composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ1–42 concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ1–42 assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ1–42. The measured levels of Aβ1–42 are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ1–42 but depend on the total amounts of Aβ1–42. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ1–42 are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ1–42 concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ1–42 levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ1–42. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ1–42, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ1–42 need to be elucidated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信