机器学习驱动的数据融合的色谱,等离子体图,和法医感兴趣的化合物的红外光谱

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Giorgio Felizzato, Giuliano Iacobellis, Nicola Liberatore, Sandro Mengali, Martin Sabo, Patrizia Scandurra, Roberto Viola and Francesco Saverio Romolo*, 
{"title":"机器学习驱动的数据融合的色谱,等离子体图,和法医感兴趣的化合物的红外光谱","authors":"Giorgio Felizzato,&nbsp;Giuliano Iacobellis,&nbsp;Nicola Liberatore,&nbsp;Sandro Mengali,&nbsp;Martin Sabo,&nbsp;Patrizia Scandurra,&nbsp;Roberto Viola and Francesco Saverio Romolo*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1010710.1021/acsomega.4c10107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Achieving fast analytical results on-site with the highest possible accuracy in forensic analyses is crucial for investigations. While portable sensors are essential for crime scene analysis, they often face limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially due to environmental factors. Data fusion (DF) techniques can enhance accuracy and reliability by combining information from multiple sensors. This study develops different DF approaches using data from two sensors: ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and gas chromatography-quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (GC-QEPAS), aiming to improve the safety of crime scene operators and the accuracy of on-site forensic analysis. Two DF approaches were developed for acetone and DMMP: low-level (LLDF) and mid-level (MLDF), meanwhile a high-level (HLDF) approach was applied to TATP. LLDF concatenated preprocessed data matrices, while MLDF employed principal component analysis for feature extraction. LLDF and MLDF used one-class support vector machines (OC-SVM) for classification, while HLDF combined OC-SVM for IMS and SIMCA for GC-QEPAS. Sensor location within crime scenes was established using traditional measuring tape and laser distance meters, with a 1 m cutoff distance between sensors deemed appropriate for indoor crime scenes. LLDF achieved high accuracy but was sensitive to concentration variations, while MLDF enhanced the classification robustness. HLDF allowed for independent sensor use in real scenarios. All of the methods reached 100% accuracy for DMMP and acetone, and the MLDF approach was the fastest among the DF methods, demonstrating its potential for rapid applications. DF approaches can significantly enhance the safety and accuracy of forensic investigations, with future research planned to extend data sets and include more sensors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 7","pages":"7048–7057 7048–7057"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Driven Data Fusion of Chromatograms, Plasmagrams, and IR Spectra of Chemical Compounds of Forensic Interest\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Felizzato,&nbsp;Giuliano Iacobellis,&nbsp;Nicola Liberatore,&nbsp;Sandro Mengali,&nbsp;Martin Sabo,&nbsp;Patrizia Scandurra,&nbsp;Roberto Viola and Francesco Saverio Romolo*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c1010710.1021/acsomega.4c10107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Achieving fast analytical results on-site with the highest possible accuracy in forensic analyses is crucial for investigations. While portable sensors are essential for crime scene analysis, they often face limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially due to environmental factors. Data fusion (DF) techniques can enhance accuracy and reliability by combining information from multiple sensors. This study develops different DF approaches using data from two sensors: ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and gas chromatography-quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (GC-QEPAS), aiming to improve the safety of crime scene operators and the accuracy of on-site forensic analysis. Two DF approaches were developed for acetone and DMMP: low-level (LLDF) and mid-level (MLDF), meanwhile a high-level (HLDF) approach was applied to TATP. LLDF concatenated preprocessed data matrices, while MLDF employed principal component analysis for feature extraction. LLDF and MLDF used one-class support vector machines (OC-SVM) for classification, while HLDF combined OC-SVM for IMS and SIMCA for GC-QEPAS. Sensor location within crime scenes was established using traditional measuring tape and laser distance meters, with a 1 m cutoff distance between sensors deemed appropriate for indoor crime scenes. LLDF achieved high accuracy but was sensitive to concentration variations, while MLDF enhanced the classification robustness. HLDF allowed for independent sensor use in real scenarios. All of the methods reached 100% accuracy for DMMP and acetone, and the MLDF approach was the fastest among the DF methods, demonstrating its potential for rapid applications. DF approaches can significantly enhance the safety and accuracy of forensic investigations, with future research planned to extend data sets and include more sensors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"7048–7057 7048–7057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10107\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法医分析中,以最高的准确性在现场获得快速分析结果对于调查至关重要。虽然便携式传感器在犯罪现场分析中是必不可少的,但由于环境因素的影响,其灵敏度和特异性往往受到限制。数据融合(DF)技术可以通过结合多个传感器的信息来提高精度和可靠性。本研究利用离子迁移率光谱(IMS)和气相色谱-石英增强光声光谱(GC-QEPAS)两种传感器的数据开发了不同的DF方法,旨在提高犯罪现场操作员的安全性和现场法医分析的准确性。对丙酮和DMMP开发了两种DF方法:低水平(LLDF)和中等水平(MLDF),同时对TATP应用了高水平(HLDF)方法。LLDF将预处理后的数据矩阵进行拼接,MLDF采用主成分分析进行特征提取。LLDF和MLDF采用单类支持向量机(OC-SVM)进行分类,HLDF采用OC-SVM对IMS进行分类,SIMCA对GC-QEPAS进行分类。使用传统卷尺和激光测距仪在犯罪现场内建立传感器位置,传感器之间的截止距离为1m,被认为适合室内犯罪现场。LLDF准确率较高,但对浓度变化敏感,MLDF分类稳健性较强。HLDF允许在真实场景中独立使用传感器。所有方法对DMMP和丙酮的测定准确度均达到100%,其中MLDF方法是DF方法中最快的,显示了其快速应用的潜力。DF方法可以显著提高法医调查的安全性和准确性,未来的研究计划扩展数据集并包括更多的传感器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning-Driven Data Fusion of Chromatograms, Plasmagrams, and IR Spectra of Chemical Compounds of Forensic Interest

Achieving fast analytical results on-site with the highest possible accuracy in forensic analyses is crucial for investigations. While portable sensors are essential for crime scene analysis, they often face limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially due to environmental factors. Data fusion (DF) techniques can enhance accuracy and reliability by combining information from multiple sensors. This study develops different DF approaches using data from two sensors: ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and gas chromatography-quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (GC-QEPAS), aiming to improve the safety of crime scene operators and the accuracy of on-site forensic analysis. Two DF approaches were developed for acetone and DMMP: low-level (LLDF) and mid-level (MLDF), meanwhile a high-level (HLDF) approach was applied to TATP. LLDF concatenated preprocessed data matrices, while MLDF employed principal component analysis for feature extraction. LLDF and MLDF used one-class support vector machines (OC-SVM) for classification, while HLDF combined OC-SVM for IMS and SIMCA for GC-QEPAS. Sensor location within crime scenes was established using traditional measuring tape and laser distance meters, with a 1 m cutoff distance between sensors deemed appropriate for indoor crime scenes. LLDF achieved high accuracy but was sensitive to concentration variations, while MLDF enhanced the classification robustness. HLDF allowed for independent sensor use in real scenarios. All of the methods reached 100% accuracy for DMMP and acetone, and the MLDF approach was the fastest among the DF methods, demonstrating its potential for rapid applications. DF approaches can significantly enhance the safety and accuracy of forensic investigations, with future research planned to extend data sets and include more sensors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信