大规模特定主体大脑网络中非线性癫痫发作扩散动态的可控性。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
S Amin Moosavi, Jordan S Feldman, Wilson Truccolo
{"title":"大规模特定主体大脑网络中非线性癫痫发作扩散动态的可控性。","authors":"S Amin Moosavi, Jordan S Feldman, Wilson Truccolo","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-90632-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Closed-loop electrical stimulation has become an important alternative to resective surgery for control of pharmacologically-resistant focal epileptic seizures. Seizure spread across large-scale brain networks, rather than its focal onset, is what commonly leads to major disruptions in sensorimotor and cognitive processing, as well as loss-of-consciousness, one of the main impairing aspects of the disorder. Electrical stimulation, triggered by early detection of seizure onset in epileptogenic zones (EZs), has been applied to prevent spread and its subsequent effects. Here, we show how linear feedback seizure-spread controllability in subject-specific (white-matter tractography) Epileptor network models is affected by variations in brain excitability, network coupling strength, control latency and gain, and actuation targets. Feedback control can qualitatively change the nonlinear seizure dynamics, and the paths to seizure termination and spread prevention. Notably, control onset latency is a critical parameter leading to a phase transition in spread controllability. Consequently, the efficacy of EZ-only actuation is limited depending on network excitability, coupling strength, and practical latencies for detection and actuation. Additional feedback-stabilization control of theoretically-derived optimal node subsets in the network are necessary for spread prevention. Finally, we contrast our linear-feedback controllability assessment with other measures based on minimum-energy (Gramian) controllability and nonlinear pulse-perturbation approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"6467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controllability of nonlinear epileptic-seizure spreading dynamics in large-scale subject-specific brain networks.\",\"authors\":\"S Amin Moosavi, Jordan S Feldman, Wilson Truccolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-90632-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Closed-loop electrical stimulation has become an important alternative to resective surgery for control of pharmacologically-resistant focal epileptic seizures. Seizure spread across large-scale brain networks, rather than its focal onset, is what commonly leads to major disruptions in sensorimotor and cognitive processing, as well as loss-of-consciousness, one of the main impairing aspects of the disorder. Electrical stimulation, triggered by early detection of seizure onset in epileptogenic zones (EZs), has been applied to prevent spread and its subsequent effects. Here, we show how linear feedback seizure-spread controllability in subject-specific (white-matter tractography) Epileptor network models is affected by variations in brain excitability, network coupling strength, control latency and gain, and actuation targets. Feedback control can qualitatively change the nonlinear seizure dynamics, and the paths to seizure termination and spread prevention. Notably, control onset latency is a critical parameter leading to a phase transition in spread controllability. Consequently, the efficacy of EZ-only actuation is limited depending on network excitability, coupling strength, and practical latencies for detection and actuation. Additional feedback-stabilization control of theoretically-derived optimal node subsets in the network are necessary for spread prevention. Finally, we contrast our linear-feedback controllability assessment with other measures based on minimum-energy (Gramian) controllability and nonlinear pulse-perturbation approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"6467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846898/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90632-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90632-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

闭环电刺激已成为一种重要的替代手术切除控制药物抵抗局灶性癫痫发作。癫痫发作在大范围的大脑网络中扩散,而不是局部发作,通常会导致感觉运动和认知处理的严重中断,以及意识丧失,这是该疾病的主要损害因素之一。电刺激是由在癫痫发生区(EZs)早期发现癫痫发作触发的,已被用于防止传播及其后续影响。在这里,我们展示了受试者特异性(白质束图)癫痫网络模型中的线性反馈癫痫扩散可控性是如何受到大脑兴奋性、网络耦合强度、控制延迟和增益以及驱动目标变化的影响的。反馈控制可以定性地改变非线性的癫痫发作动态,以及癫痫发作终止和预防扩散的路径。值得注意的是,控制起始延迟是导致扩散可控性相变的关键参数。因此,纯ez驱动的有效性取决于网络的兴奋性、耦合强度以及检测和驱动的实际延迟。对理论推导的网络最优节点子集进行附加反馈镇定控制是防止扩散的必要条件。最后,我们将我们的线性反馈可控性评估与其他基于最小能量(Gramian)可控性和非线性脉冲摄动方法的测量方法进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controllability of nonlinear epileptic-seizure spreading dynamics in large-scale subject-specific brain networks.

Closed-loop electrical stimulation has become an important alternative to resective surgery for control of pharmacologically-resistant focal epileptic seizures. Seizure spread across large-scale brain networks, rather than its focal onset, is what commonly leads to major disruptions in sensorimotor and cognitive processing, as well as loss-of-consciousness, one of the main impairing aspects of the disorder. Electrical stimulation, triggered by early detection of seizure onset in epileptogenic zones (EZs), has been applied to prevent spread and its subsequent effects. Here, we show how linear feedback seizure-spread controllability in subject-specific (white-matter tractography) Epileptor network models is affected by variations in brain excitability, network coupling strength, control latency and gain, and actuation targets. Feedback control can qualitatively change the nonlinear seizure dynamics, and the paths to seizure termination and spread prevention. Notably, control onset latency is a critical parameter leading to a phase transition in spread controllability. Consequently, the efficacy of EZ-only actuation is limited depending on network excitability, coupling strength, and practical latencies for detection and actuation. Additional feedback-stabilization control of theoretically-derived optimal node subsets in the network are necessary for spread prevention. Finally, we contrast our linear-feedback controllability assessment with other measures based on minimum-energy (Gramian) controllability and nonlinear pulse-perturbation approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信