IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Adam J Janowski, Giovanni Berardi, Kazuhiro Hayashi, Ashley N Plumb, Joe B Lesnak, Tahsin Khataei, Ben Martin, Christopher J Benson, Kathleen A Sluka
{"title":"The influence of sex on activity in voluntary wheel running, forced treadmill running, and open field testing in mice.","authors":"Adam J Janowski, Giovanni Berardi, Kazuhiro Hayashi, Ashley N Plumb, Joe B Lesnak, Tahsin Khataei, Ben Martin, Christopher J Benson, Kathleen A Sluka","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical activity is commonly used for both measuring and treating dysfunction. While preclinical work has been historically biased towards males, the inclusion of both males and females is gaining popularity. With the increasing inclusion of both sexes, it is imperative to determine sex differences in common behavioral assays. This was a secondary analysis of healthy naïve mice to determine baseline sex differences in three activity assays: voluntary wheel running (32 mice), forced treadmill running (178 mice), and open field (88 mice). In voluntary wheel running, females showed greater distance run, running time, bout duration, and speed, but no difference in total bouts. In forced treadmill running, females showed greater time to exhaustion, but no difference in maximum speed attained. In open field, males showed greater active time but no difference in distance and speed over 30 min; however, male mice showed a downward trajectory in distance and speed over the final 20 min of testing, whereas females did not. These data suggest that male mice demonstrate comparable activity intensity to female mice but do not match females' duration of activity, especially for volitional tasks. Researchers utilizing these assays should account for sex differences as they could mask true findings in an experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 4","pages":"e70246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体育活动通常用于测量和治疗功能障碍。虽然临床前研究历来偏重于男性,但同时纳入男性和女性的研究正日益流行。随着越来越多的研究同时纳入雌雄动物,确定常见行为测定中的性别差异势在必行。这是对健康的天真小鼠进行的二次分析,以确定三种活动测定中的基线性别差异:自主车轮跑(32 只小鼠)、强迫跑步机跑(178 只小鼠)和空地跑(88 只小鼠)。在自主车轮跑中,雌性小鼠的跑步距离、跑步时间、阵痛持续时间和速度都更长,但总阵痛次数没有差异。在强制跑步机上跑步时,雌性耗尽时间更长,但达到的最大速度没有差异。在开放场地中,雄性小鼠的活动时间更长,但在30分钟的距离和速度上没有差异;不过,在测试的最后20分钟,雄性小鼠的距离和速度呈下降趋势,而雌性小鼠则没有。这些数据表明,雄性小鼠的活动强度与雌性小鼠相当,但活动持续时间却不如雌性小鼠,尤其是在执行意志任务时。研究人员在使用这些检测方法时应考虑到性别差异,因为它们可能会掩盖实验中的真实发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of sex on activity in voluntary wheel running, forced treadmill running, and open field testing in mice.

Physical activity is commonly used for both measuring and treating dysfunction. While preclinical work has been historically biased towards males, the inclusion of both males and females is gaining popularity. With the increasing inclusion of both sexes, it is imperative to determine sex differences in common behavioral assays. This was a secondary analysis of healthy naïve mice to determine baseline sex differences in three activity assays: voluntary wheel running (32 mice), forced treadmill running (178 mice), and open field (88 mice). In voluntary wheel running, females showed greater distance run, running time, bout duration, and speed, but no difference in total bouts. In forced treadmill running, females showed greater time to exhaustion, but no difference in maximum speed attained. In open field, males showed greater active time but no difference in distance and speed over 30 min; however, male mice showed a downward trajectory in distance and speed over the final 20 min of testing, whereas females did not. These data suggest that male mice demonstrate comparable activity intensity to female mice but do not match females' duration of activity, especially for volitional tasks. Researchers utilizing these assays should account for sex differences as they could mask true findings in an experiment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信