治疗顺序对合并合并症和三阴性或her2阳性乳腺癌的老年妇女的影响

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Nina Tamirisa, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Heather Lin, Simona F Shaitelman, Gildy Babiera, Isabelle Bedrosian
{"title":"治疗顺序对合并合并症和三阴性或her2阳性乳腺癌的老年妇女的影响","authors":"Nina Tamirisa, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Heather Lin, Simona F Shaitelman, Gildy Babiera, Isabelle Bedrosian","doi":"10.1038/s41523-025-00732-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We sought to determine whether sequencing of treatment impacted outcomes in older, comorbid patients. Using the National Cancer Database(2010-2017), 2911 patients >70 with a Charleson Deyo Comorbidity(CCDM) score of 2/3 and cT1c-3/N0-3/HER2 positive or triple-negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy,surgery,or both were included. Chi-square tests evaluated differences between groups. Multivariable models evaluated associations between overall survival and treatment. Majority 87.4%(n = 2544) underwent surgery first and 36.0%(n = 917) received adjuvant chemotherapy while 77.9%(n = 286) of chemotherapy first patients underwent surgery. Receipt of both modalities was associated with the best survival followed by surgery alone then chemotherapy alone. Additional analysis demonstrated no survival difference between patients who underwent surgery(±systemic therapy) vs systemic therapy(±surgery) first. Although combined treatment offers the best survival, as a single modality, patients treated with surgery vs systemic therapy alone fare better. This information in conjunction with patient preferences on quality of life can be used in making shared decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"11 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequence of therapy impact on older women with comorbidities and triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Tamirisa, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Heather Lin, Simona F Shaitelman, Gildy Babiera, Isabelle Bedrosian\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41523-025-00732-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We sought to determine whether sequencing of treatment impacted outcomes in older, comorbid patients. Using the National Cancer Database(2010-2017), 2911 patients >70 with a Charleson Deyo Comorbidity(CCDM) score of 2/3 and cT1c-3/N0-3/HER2 positive or triple-negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy,surgery,or both were included. Chi-square tests evaluated differences between groups. Multivariable models evaluated associations between overall survival and treatment. Majority 87.4%(n = 2544) underwent surgery first and 36.0%(n = 917) received adjuvant chemotherapy while 77.9%(n = 286) of chemotherapy first patients underwent surgery. Receipt of both modalities was associated with the best survival followed by surgery alone then chemotherapy alone. Additional analysis demonstrated no survival difference between patients who underwent surgery(±systemic therapy) vs systemic therapy(±surgery) first. Although combined treatment offers the best survival, as a single modality, patients treated with surgery vs systemic therapy alone fare better. This information in conjunction with patient preferences on quality of life can be used in making shared decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846986/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00732-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00732-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们试图确定治疗顺序是否会影响老年合并症患者的预后。使用国家癌症数据库(2010-2017),纳入了2911例bb70, CCDM评分为2/3,cT1c-3/N0-3/HER2阳性或三阴性的乳腺癌患者,这些患者接受了化疗、手术或两者兼有。卡方检验评估各组之间的差异。多变量模型评估了总生存率与治疗之间的关系。87.4%(n = 2544)先行手术,36.0%(n = 917)先行辅助化疗,77.9%(n = 286)先行手术。接受两种治疗方式均与最佳生存率相关,随后分别进行手术和化疗。进一步的分析表明,首先接受手术(±全身治疗)和全身治疗(±手术)的患者之间没有生存差异。虽然联合治疗提供了最好的生存率,但作为一种单一的治疗方式,手术治疗比单独的全身治疗效果更好。这些信息与患者对生活质量的偏好相结合,可用于共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sequence of therapy impact on older women with comorbidities and triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer.

Sequence of therapy impact on older women with comorbidities and triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer.

Sequence of therapy impact on older women with comorbidities and triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer.

We sought to determine whether sequencing of treatment impacted outcomes in older, comorbid patients. Using the National Cancer Database(2010-2017), 2911 patients >70 with a Charleson Deyo Comorbidity(CCDM) score of 2/3 and cT1c-3/N0-3/HER2 positive or triple-negative breast cancer treated with chemotherapy,surgery,or both were included. Chi-square tests evaluated differences between groups. Multivariable models evaluated associations between overall survival and treatment. Majority 87.4%(n = 2544) underwent surgery first and 36.0%(n = 917) received adjuvant chemotherapy while 77.9%(n = 286) of chemotherapy first patients underwent surgery. Receipt of both modalities was associated with the best survival followed by surgery alone then chemotherapy alone. Additional analysis demonstrated no survival difference between patients who underwent surgery(±systemic therapy) vs systemic therapy(±surgery) first. Although combined treatment offers the best survival, as a single modality, patients treated with surgery vs systemic therapy alone fare better. This information in conjunction with patient preferences on quality of life can be used in making shared decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信