IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nayoung Kim, Julie Kirsch, Rosina Millevolte, Madeline K Oguss, David L Fraser, Kate Kobinsky, Megan E Piper, Jessica W Cook, Tanya R Schlam, Timothy B Baker, Michael C Fiore, Hasmeena Kathuria, Danielle E McCarthy
{"title":"Representativeness of electronic referral to smoking treatment trials in adult primary care.","authors":"Nayoung Kim, Julie Kirsch, Rosina Millevolte, Madeline K Oguss, David L Fraser, Kate Kobinsky, Megan E Piper, Jessica W Cook, Tanya R Schlam, Timothy B Baker, Michael C Fiore, Hasmeena Kathuria, Danielle E McCarthy","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some populations are under-represented in smoking treatment research. Electronic health record (EHR)-enabled referral of patients who smoke may enhance representativeness of clinical trial samples. This study assessed the representativeness of smoking treatment trial electronic referral (e-referral), exclusion, enrollment, and engagement in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen adult primary care clinics in 2 healthcare systems offered patients who smoked e-referral to smoking reduction or cessation treatment trials. Extracted EHR data were analyzed to compare rates of e-referral and enrollment across patient groups defined by sex, age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status. Trial eligibility screening data were analyzed to identify differential exclusion of patient groups by sex, race, or neighborhood disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 23.3% of eligible patients were e-referred, with elevated e-referral rates among women, African American, Medicaid-eligible, and middle-aged patients. Among e-referred patients, 20.5% were excluded at trial eligibility screening, with exclusions elevated for women, minoritized individuals, and individuals from disadvantaged neighborhoods. Overall, 7.0% of patients who smoked enrolled in a smoking treatment trial, with enrollment rates elevated among women, those over age 44, and, in one health system, African American patients. Most enrollees (>87%) initiated counseling and enrollees completed 52.4%-79.9% of counseling sessions, with older, college-educated, and lower-income enrollees attending more sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proactive e-referral in primary care may improve representation of certain groups (e.g., African American and Medicaid-eligible patients) in smoking treatment trials, but differential exclusion at eligibility screening may reduce sample representativeness. Relaxing non-essential eligibility criteria may enhance inclusion of minoritized and disadvantaged populations in smoking treatment research.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Electronic referral of adult primary care patients who smoke to smoking cessation and reduction trials may enhance referral of high-priority populations (e.g., African American patients and those eligible for Medicaid) to tobacco treatment trials. Relaxing treatment trial inclusion criteria may enhance representation of minoritized and disadvantaged patients in treatment trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:一些人群在吸烟治疗研究中代表性不足。通过电子健康记录(EHR)转介吸烟患者可提高临床试验样本的代表性。本研究评估了吸烟治疗试验电子转介(e-referral)、排除、入组和参与初级保健的代表性:方法: 2个医疗系统的18家成人初级保健诊所为吸烟患者提供电子转介服务,让他们参加减少吸烟或戒烟治疗试验。对提取的电子病历数据进行分析,比较不同性别、年龄、种族、民族和保险状况的患者群体的电子转诊率和入组率。对试验资格筛选数据进行了分析,以确定因性别、种族或邻里劣势而被排除在外的不同患者群体:总体而言,23.3% 的合格患者接受了电子转诊,其中女性、非裔美国人、符合医疗补助条件的患者和中年患者的电子转诊率较高。在电子转介的患者中,20.5%的患者在试验资格筛选时被排除在外,其中女性、少数民族和来自贫困地区的患者被排除在外的比例较高。总体而言,7.0%的吸烟患者参加了吸烟治疗试验,其中女性、44岁以上人群以及非裔美国人患者的参加率较高。大多数参加者(>87%)开始接受咨询,参加者完成了52.4%-79.9%的咨询课程,年龄较大、受过大学教育和收入较低的参加者参加的课程较多:在初级保健中积极开展电子转诊可能会提高某些群体(如非裔美国人和符合医疗补助条件的患者)在吸烟治疗试验中的代表性,但在资格筛选中的不同排除可能会降低样本的代表性。放宽非必要的资格审查标准可能会提高吸烟治疗研究对少数群体和弱势群体的包容性:通过电子方式将吸烟的成人初级保健患者转介到戒烟和减烟试验中,可加强将高优先人群(如非裔美国患者和符合医疗补助资格的人群)转介到烟草治疗试验中。放宽治疗试验纳入标准可提高少数群体和弱势患者在治疗试验中的代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representativeness of electronic referral to smoking treatment trials in adult primary care.

Introduction: Some populations are under-represented in smoking treatment research. Electronic health record (EHR)-enabled referral of patients who smoke may enhance representativeness of clinical trial samples. This study assessed the representativeness of smoking treatment trial electronic referral (e-referral), exclusion, enrollment, and engagement in primary care.

Methods: Eighteen adult primary care clinics in 2 healthcare systems offered patients who smoked e-referral to smoking reduction or cessation treatment trials. Extracted EHR data were analyzed to compare rates of e-referral and enrollment across patient groups defined by sex, age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status. Trial eligibility screening data were analyzed to identify differential exclusion of patient groups by sex, race, or neighborhood disadvantage.

Results: Overall, 23.3% of eligible patients were e-referred, with elevated e-referral rates among women, African American, Medicaid-eligible, and middle-aged patients. Among e-referred patients, 20.5% were excluded at trial eligibility screening, with exclusions elevated for women, minoritized individuals, and individuals from disadvantaged neighborhoods. Overall, 7.0% of patients who smoked enrolled in a smoking treatment trial, with enrollment rates elevated among women, those over age 44, and, in one health system, African American patients. Most enrollees (>87%) initiated counseling and enrollees completed 52.4%-79.9% of counseling sessions, with older, college-educated, and lower-income enrollees attending more sessions.

Conclusions: Proactive e-referral in primary care may improve representation of certain groups (e.g., African American and Medicaid-eligible patients) in smoking treatment trials, but differential exclusion at eligibility screening may reduce sample representativeness. Relaxing non-essential eligibility criteria may enhance inclusion of minoritized and disadvantaged populations in smoking treatment research.

Implications: Electronic referral of adult primary care patients who smoke to smoking cessation and reduction trials may enhance referral of high-priority populations (e.g., African American patients and those eligible for Medicaid) to tobacco treatment trials. Relaxing treatment trial inclusion criteria may enhance representation of minoritized and disadvantaged patients in treatment trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信