参照物选择对运动平衡观察的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Tania López Hernández , Marina Caparó Ferré , Albert Salas-Huetos , Isabel Salvat Salvat , Cristina Adillón Camón
{"title":"参照物选择对运动平衡观察的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Tania López Hernández ,&nbsp;Marina Caparó Ferré ,&nbsp;Albert Salas-Huetos ,&nbsp;Isabel Salvat Salvat ,&nbsp;Cristina Adillón Camón","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Action observation (AO) generates motor simulations in the brain, activating areas involved in actual movement and facilitating imitation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to analyze if observing actions performed by a personally selected referent improves balance in asymptomatic individuals compared to observing a standard referent.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 165 healthy participants were randomized into three groups: a control group observing landscape videos, a standard referent group observing an unidentifiable model, and a chosen referent group selecting models based on personal similarity. Balance (static and dynamic) and strength were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, at 15 days, and at 4 weeks. AO exercises related to balance were viewed three times per week for four weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Key findings revealed favorable changes in static balance for both the standard and chosen referent groups, particularly in challenging single-leg stances with eyes closed. Strength improvements were observed only in the standard referent group. Average adherence to the protocol was 91%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AO enhances balance and strength in healthy individuals, with referent characteristics significantly impacting outcomes. The findings suggest referent selection is a crucial factor in AO’s efficacy, emphasizing AO’s therapeutic potential, particularly for populations with mobility challenges. Further research should refine referent selection to optimize clinical results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of referent selection on balance in action observation: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Tania López Hernández ,&nbsp;Marina Caparó Ferré ,&nbsp;Albert Salas-Huetos ,&nbsp;Isabel Salvat Salvat ,&nbsp;Cristina Adillón Camón\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Action observation (AO) generates motor simulations in the brain, activating areas involved in actual movement and facilitating imitation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to analyze if observing actions performed by a personally selected referent improves balance in asymptomatic individuals compared to observing a standard referent.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 165 healthy participants were randomized into three groups: a control group observing landscape videos, a standard referent group observing an unidentifiable model, and a chosen referent group selecting models based on personal similarity. Balance (static and dynamic) and strength were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, at 15 days, and at 4 weeks. AO exercises related to balance were viewed three times per week for four weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Key findings revealed favorable changes in static balance for both the standard and chosen referent groups, particularly in challenging single-leg stances with eyes closed. Strength improvements were observed only in the standard referent group. Average adherence to the protocol was 91%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AO enhances balance and strength in healthy individuals, with referent characteristics significantly impacting outcomes. The findings suggest referent selection is a crucial factor in AO’s efficacy, emphasizing AO’s therapeutic potential, particularly for populations with mobility challenges. Further research should refine referent selection to optimize clinical results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary therapies in medicine\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary therapies in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229925000251\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229925000251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:动作观察(Action observation, AO)在大脑中产生运动模拟,激活参与实际运动的区域,促进模仿。本随机对照试验旨在分析与观察标准参照者相比,观察个人选择参照者所做的动作是否能改善无症状个体的平衡。方法:将165名健康受试者随机分为3组:观察景观视频的对照组、观察不可识别模型的标准参照组和根据个人相似度选择模型的选择参照组。在基线、干预后立即、15天和4周时评估平衡(静态和动态)和力量。与平衡相关的AO练习每周进行三次,持续四周。结果:主要发现显示了标准组和选定参照组在静态平衡方面的有利变化,特别是在具有挑战性的闭眼单腿站立时。仅在标准参照组中观察到力量改善。该方案的平均依从性为91%。结论:AO增强了健康个体的平衡和力量,相关特征显著影响预后。研究结果表明,参照选择是影响AO疗效的关键因素,强调了AO的治疗潜力,特别是对行动不便的人群。进一步研究应细化参照物选择,优化临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of referent selection on balance in action observation: A randomized controlled trial

Background and purpose

Action observation (AO) generates motor simulations in the brain, activating areas involved in actual movement and facilitating imitation. This randomized controlled trial aimed to analyze if observing actions performed by a personally selected referent improves balance in asymptomatic individuals compared to observing a standard referent.

Methods

A total of 165 healthy participants were randomized into three groups: a control group observing landscape videos, a standard referent group observing an unidentifiable model, and a chosen referent group selecting models based on personal similarity. Balance (static and dynamic) and strength were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, at 15 days, and at 4 weeks. AO exercises related to balance were viewed three times per week for four weeks.

Results

Key findings revealed favorable changes in static balance for both the standard and chosen referent groups, particularly in challenging single-leg stances with eyes closed. Strength improvements were observed only in the standard referent group. Average adherence to the protocol was 91%.

Conclusion

AO enhances balance and strength in healthy individuals, with referent characteristics significantly impacting outcomes. The findings suggest referent selection is a crucial factor in AO’s efficacy, emphasizing AO’s therapeutic potential, particularly for populations with mobility challenges. Further research should refine referent selection to optimize clinical results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信