不同营养环境下植物多样性对草地能量动态的影响不同

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Oksana Y. Buzhdygan, Britta Tietjen, Jana S. Petermann, Nico Eisenhauer, Jes Hines, Bernhard Schmid, Selina Baldauf, Anne Ebeling, Christoph Scherber, Nina Buchmann, Stuart R. Borrett, Hans de Kroon, Wolfgang Weisser, Sebastian T. Meyer
{"title":"不同营养环境下植物多样性对草地能量动态的影响不同","authors":"Oksana Y. Buzhdygan,&nbsp;Britta Tietjen,&nbsp;Jana S. Petermann,&nbsp;Nico Eisenhauer,&nbsp;Jes Hines,&nbsp;Bernhard Schmid,&nbsp;Selina Baldauf,&nbsp;Anne Ebeling,&nbsp;Christoph Scherber,&nbsp;Nina Buchmann,&nbsp;Stuart R. Borrett,&nbsp;Hans de Kroon,&nbsp;Wolfgang Weisser,&nbsp;Sebastian T. Meyer","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The strength of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships varies within and across studies, depending on the investigated ecosystem function and diversity facet (e.g., species richness or functional composition), limiting our ability to translate BEF results into recommendations for management and conservation. The variability in BEF relationships is particularly high when considering complex multitrophic communities and can be explained by food web contexts. Here we examine how different plant diversity facets affect biomass stocks and energy flows of each trophic group depending on their position in the trophic network. We used coupled aboveground–belowground multitrophic networks of energy dynamics, assembled across the experimental gradients of grassland plant species richness, functional diversity, and presence of plant functional groups. We compared the strengths of these diversity effects between trophic groups, trophic levels, aboveground versus belowground subnetworks, and types of ecosystem functions. Plant species richness, functional trait diversity, and the presence of legumes and grasses were influential drivers of ecosystem energetics. The effects of plant species richness across the food web often operated through mechanisms of plant functional-trait diversity. The effects of plant species richness attenuated across trophic levels. Legume presence strengthened the top-down control (predation) of primary consumers. We found an overall mismatch in the strength of diversity effects on flows versus stocks. Some trophic groups showed even contrasting direction in responses of their stocks and flows to plant diversity. This indicates that plant diversity constrains consumer functioning by means other than only altered consumer biomass. Responses of flows and stocks to plant diversity differed between trophic groups, and aboveground versus belowground parts. Individual stocks and energy flows were responsive to different biodiversity facets, highlighting the importance of the explicit consideration of individual functions and diversity facets for a comprehensive multitrophic understanding. For example, legume presence increased aboveground processes but reduced plant carbon uptake and belowground plant production. Plant communities containing legumes lost more biomass to herbivores, had faster decomposition, and channeled less energy to soil detritus. An important implication of these results is that targeted grassland management would profit from focusing on specific plant diversity facets depending on the ecosystem function or service of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts\",\"authors\":\"Oksana Y. Buzhdygan,&nbsp;Britta Tietjen,&nbsp;Jana S. Petermann,&nbsp;Nico Eisenhauer,&nbsp;Jes Hines,&nbsp;Bernhard Schmid,&nbsp;Selina Baldauf,&nbsp;Anne Ebeling,&nbsp;Christoph Scherber,&nbsp;Nina Buchmann,&nbsp;Stuart R. Borrett,&nbsp;Hans de Kroon,&nbsp;Wolfgang Weisser,&nbsp;Sebastian T. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecm.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The strength of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships varies within and across studies, depending on the investigated ecosystem function and diversity facet (e.g., species richness or functional composition), limiting our ability to translate BEF results into recommendations for management and conservation. The variability in BEF relationships is particularly high when considering complex multitrophic communities and can be explained by food web contexts. Here we examine how different plant diversity facets affect biomass stocks and energy flows of each trophic group depending on their position in the trophic network. We used coupled aboveground–belowground multitrophic networks of energy dynamics, assembled across the experimental gradients of grassland plant species richness, functional diversity, and presence of plant functional groups. We compared the strengths of these diversity effects between trophic groups, trophic levels, aboveground versus belowground subnetworks, and types of ecosystem functions. Plant species richness, functional trait diversity, and the presence of legumes and grasses were influential drivers of ecosystem energetics. The effects of plant species richness across the food web often operated through mechanisms of plant functional-trait diversity. The effects of plant species richness attenuated across trophic levels. Legume presence strengthened the top-down control (predation) of primary consumers. We found an overall mismatch in the strength of diversity effects on flows versus stocks. Some trophic groups showed even contrasting direction in responses of their stocks and flows to plant diversity. This indicates that plant diversity constrains consumer functioning by means other than only altered consumer biomass. Responses of flows and stocks to plant diversity differed between trophic groups, and aboveground versus belowground parts. Individual stocks and energy flows were responsive to different biodiversity facets, highlighting the importance of the explicit consideration of individual functions and diversity facets for a comprehensive multitrophic understanding. For example, legume presence increased aboveground processes but reduced plant carbon uptake and belowground plant production. Plant communities containing legumes lost more biomass to herbivores, had faster decomposition, and channeled less energy to soil detritus. An important implication of these results is that targeted grassland management would profit from focusing on specific plant diversity facets depending on the ecosystem function or service of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.70004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物多样性-生态系统功能(BEF)关系的强度取决于所调查的生态系统功能和多样性方面(如物种丰富度或功能组成),在研究内部和不同研究之间存在差异,这限制了我们将BEF结果转化为管理和保护建议的能力。当考虑复杂的多营养群落时,BEF关系的变异性特别高,可以用食物网背景来解释。在这里,我们研究了不同的植物多样性方面如何影响生物量储量和能量流,这取决于它们在营养网络中的位置。我们使用耦合的地上-地下多营养能量动态网络,在草地植物物种丰富度、功能多样性和植物功能群存在的实验梯度上进行组合。我们比较了这些多样性效应在营养群体、营养水平、地上与地下子网络以及生态系统功能类型之间的优势。植物物种丰富度、功能性状多样性以及豆科植物和禾草植物的存在是生态系统能量学的重要驱动因素。植物物种丰富度对食物网的影响通常是通过植物功能性状多样性机制来实现的。植物物种丰富度的影响在营养水平上逐渐减弱。豆科植物的存在加强了对主要消费者自上而下的控制(捕食)。我们发现,多样性对流量和存量的影响强度总体上不匹配。某些营养类群的存量和流量对植物多样性的响应甚至呈现出截然相反的方向。这表明植物多样性不仅通过改变消费者生物量,还通过其他方式限制消费者功能。不同营养类群、地上部分和地下部分对植物多样性的响应存在差异。个体种群和能量流对不同的生物多样性方面有响应,这突出了明确考虑个体功能和多样性方面对全面的多营养认识的重要性。例如,豆科植物的存在增加了地上的过程,但减少了植物的碳吸收和地下植物的产量。含有豆科植物的植物群落失去了更多的生物量给食草动物,分解速度更快,向土壤碎屑输送的能量更少。这些结果的一个重要含义是,有针对性的草地管理将受益于根据生态系统功能或感兴趣的服务关注特定的植物多样性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts

Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts

The strength of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships varies within and across studies, depending on the investigated ecosystem function and diversity facet (e.g., species richness or functional composition), limiting our ability to translate BEF results into recommendations for management and conservation. The variability in BEF relationships is particularly high when considering complex multitrophic communities and can be explained by food web contexts. Here we examine how different plant diversity facets affect biomass stocks and energy flows of each trophic group depending on their position in the trophic network. We used coupled aboveground–belowground multitrophic networks of energy dynamics, assembled across the experimental gradients of grassland plant species richness, functional diversity, and presence of plant functional groups. We compared the strengths of these diversity effects between trophic groups, trophic levels, aboveground versus belowground subnetworks, and types of ecosystem functions. Plant species richness, functional trait diversity, and the presence of legumes and grasses were influential drivers of ecosystem energetics. The effects of plant species richness across the food web often operated through mechanisms of plant functional-trait diversity. The effects of plant species richness attenuated across trophic levels. Legume presence strengthened the top-down control (predation) of primary consumers. We found an overall mismatch in the strength of diversity effects on flows versus stocks. Some trophic groups showed even contrasting direction in responses of their stocks and flows to plant diversity. This indicates that plant diversity constrains consumer functioning by means other than only altered consumer biomass. Responses of flows and stocks to plant diversity differed between trophic groups, and aboveground versus belowground parts. Individual stocks and energy flows were responsive to different biodiversity facets, highlighting the importance of the explicit consideration of individual functions and diversity facets for a comprehensive multitrophic understanding. For example, legume presence increased aboveground processes but reduced plant carbon uptake and belowground plant production. Plant communities containing legumes lost more biomass to herbivores, had faster decomposition, and channeled less energy to soil detritus. An important implication of these results is that targeted grassland management would profit from focusing on specific plant diversity facets depending on the ecosystem function or service of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信