普遍筛查家庭暴力的必要性:新泽西州COVID-19期间健康差异的社会决定因素

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kelly L. Budge , Sameeha Shaikh , Mirai Mikhail , Cassandra Bakus , Sabrina LaRosa , Chinwe Ogedegebe , Antonia F. Oladipo
{"title":"普遍筛查家庭暴力的必要性:新泽西州COVID-19期间健康差异的社会决定因素","authors":"Kelly L. Budge ,&nbsp;Sameeha Shaikh ,&nbsp;Mirai Mikhail ,&nbsp;Cassandra Bakus ,&nbsp;Sabrina LaRosa ,&nbsp;Chinwe Ogedegebe ,&nbsp;Antonia F. Oladipo","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is recognized that stressors encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic created an environment that exacerbated DV. COVID disproportionately impacted at-risk populations, but it is unclear if these social determinants of health disparities similarly impact the incidence of DV. This study aimed to identify and highlight affected communities within the state of New Jersey (NJ) that were disproportionately affected by domestic violence (DV) during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The study design was retrospective cross-sectional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Public data from the NJ Department of Health, Department of Law and Public Safety, and US Census were compared. Community factors, DV incidence, and COVID rates were analyzed using a <em>t</em>-test and Spearman correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NJ COVID-19 Incidence rates significantly correlated with varied populations based on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. The median incidence of DV per county population significantly increased from 0.55 % in 2019 to 0.63 % in 2020 (p = 0.03). However, DV incidence was not correlated with rates of COVID-19 per county (p = 0.25). Race and ethnicity did not correlate with DV rates (White, p = 0.06; Black, p = 0.11; 2+ races, 0.14; Hispanic, p = 0.55) except for Asian populations (p = 0.01). Some socioeconomic factors did correlate with DV (unemployment, p = 0.04; median household income, p = 0.003); poverty did not (p = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NJ experienced a surge in DV rates during the pandemic that cut across communities of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, in contrast to the more unequal impact of COVID-19 incidence. Findings highlight the importance of screening for DV in times of societal distress to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The imperative for universal screening of domestic violence: Social determinants of health disparities during COVID-19 within New Jersey\",\"authors\":\"Kelly L. Budge ,&nbsp;Sameeha Shaikh ,&nbsp;Mirai Mikhail ,&nbsp;Cassandra Bakus ,&nbsp;Sabrina LaRosa ,&nbsp;Chinwe Ogedegebe ,&nbsp;Antonia F. Oladipo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is recognized that stressors encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic created an environment that exacerbated DV. COVID disproportionately impacted at-risk populations, but it is unclear if these social determinants of health disparities similarly impact the incidence of DV. This study aimed to identify and highlight affected communities within the state of New Jersey (NJ) that were disproportionately affected by domestic violence (DV) during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The study design was retrospective cross-sectional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Public data from the NJ Department of Health, Department of Law and Public Safety, and US Census were compared. Community factors, DV incidence, and COVID rates were analyzed using a <em>t</em>-test and Spearman correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NJ COVID-19 Incidence rates significantly correlated with varied populations based on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. The median incidence of DV per county population significantly increased from 0.55 % in 2019 to 0.63 % in 2020 (p = 0.03). However, DV incidence was not correlated with rates of COVID-19 per county (p = 0.25). Race and ethnicity did not correlate with DV rates (White, p = 0.06; Black, p = 0.11; 2+ races, 0.14; Hispanic, p = 0.55) except for Asian populations (p = 0.01). Some socioeconomic factors did correlate with DV (unemployment, p = 0.04; median household income, p = 0.003); poverty did not (p = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NJ experienced a surge in DV rates during the pandemic that cut across communities of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, in contrast to the more unequal impact of COVID-19 incidence. Findings highlight the importance of screening for DV in times of societal distress to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535225000163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535225000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们认识到,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间遇到的压力因素创造了加剧家庭暴力的环境。COVID对高危人群的影响不成比例,但尚不清楚这些健康差异的社会决定因素是否同样影响家庭暴力的发病率。本研究旨在确定和突出在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间受到家庭暴力(DV)不成比例影响的新泽西州(NJ)受影响社区。研究设计研究设计为回顾性横断面。方法比较新泽西州卫生部、法律与公共安全部和美国人口普查局的公共数据。采用t检验和Spearman相关分析社区因素、DV发病率和COVID发病率。结果snj - COVID-19发病率与不同社会经济地位、种族和民族人群显著相关。各县人口DV发病率中位数由2019年的0.55%显著上升至2020年的0.63% (p = 0.03)。然而,家庭暴力发生率与每个县的COVID-19发病率无关(p = 0.25)。种族和民族与家庭暴力发生率无关(White, p = 0.06;黑色,p = 0.11;2+比赛,0.14;西班牙裔,p = 0.55),但亚洲人群除外(p = 0.01)。一些社会经济因素确实与DV相关(失业,p = 0.04;家庭收入中位数,p = 0.003);贫困则没有(p = 0.11)。与COVID-19发病率的不平等影响形成鲜明对比的是,疫情期间新泽西州的家庭暴力率激增,跨越了所有种族和族裔背景的社区。研究结果强调了在社会困境时期进行家庭暴力筛查对临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The imperative for universal screening of domestic violence: Social determinants of health disparities during COVID-19 within New Jersey

Background

It is recognized that stressors encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic created an environment that exacerbated DV. COVID disproportionately impacted at-risk populations, but it is unclear if these social determinants of health disparities similarly impact the incidence of DV. This study aimed to identify and highlight affected communities within the state of New Jersey (NJ) that were disproportionately affected by domestic violence (DV) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study design

The study design was retrospective cross-sectional.

Methods

Public data from the NJ Department of Health, Department of Law and Public Safety, and US Census were compared. Community factors, DV incidence, and COVID rates were analyzed using a t-test and Spearman correlation.

Results

NJ COVID-19 Incidence rates significantly correlated with varied populations based on socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. The median incidence of DV per county population significantly increased from 0.55 % in 2019 to 0.63 % in 2020 (p = 0.03). However, DV incidence was not correlated with rates of COVID-19 per county (p = 0.25). Race and ethnicity did not correlate with DV rates (White, p = 0.06; Black, p = 0.11; 2+ races, 0.14; Hispanic, p = 0.55) except for Asian populations (p = 0.01). Some socioeconomic factors did correlate with DV (unemployment, p = 0.04; median household income, p = 0.003); poverty did not (p = 0.11).

Conclusion

NJ experienced a surge in DV rates during the pandemic that cut across communities of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, in contrast to the more unequal impact of COVID-19 incidence. Findings highlight the importance of screening for DV in times of societal distress to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信