Ji Zhang , Hengyi Li , Chenyu Yan , Zigang Xu , Haiyang Zhuang , Baizan Tang , Guobo Wang
{"title":"瑞利波作用下浅埋圆形地铁隧道脆性分析的最优强度措施","authors":"Ji Zhang , Hengyi Li , Chenyu Yan , Zigang Xu , Haiyang Zhuang , Baizan Tang , Guobo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shallow subway tunnels in both the intermediate and far fields are significantly affected by Rayleigh surface waves, which typically induce substantial vertical seismic motion and exhibit high seismic destructiveness. However, current vulnerability assessments of underground tunnels primarily focus on body waves. This study aims to identify the optimal ground motion intensity measures (IMs) for evaluating the seismic fragility of shallow circular subway tunnels subjected to Rayleigh waves. A detailed dynamic analysis of soil-tunnel interaction is performed using the two-dimensional Finite Element Method, with particular emphasis on the influence of tunnel burial depth and site classification on the tunnel’s response to Rayleigh waves. The input of Rayleigh wave motion is modeled by transforming the motion into a series of equivalent forces, applied through viscoelastic boundaries. This study examines 15 widely used ground motion IMs, with diameter deformation ratio (<em>DDR</em>) serving as the damage measure (DM). Linear regression analysis is conducted to explore the relationship between IMs and <em>DDR</em>. The optimal IMs are evaluated based on criteria including efficiency, practicality, proficiency, and correlation. The results indicate that for sites classified as Class III and IV, the optimal IM is root mean square velocity (<em>v</em><sub>rms</sub>), while for Class II sites, spectral mean velocity (SMV) is more suitable. Fragility curves for shallow-buried tunnels in Class II, III, and IV sites are presented. These curves demonstrate that tunnels are most vulnerable to damage in Class II sites, followed by Class IV, and least vulnerable in Class III sites. In Class II sites, shallower tunnel depths are associated with increased seismic damage, while deeper tunnels in Class III and IV sites experience greater seismic damage. The primary factor influencing seismic damage to tunnels is the vertical relative deformation of the surrounding soil layers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 106478"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal intensity measures for fragility analysis of shallow circular subway tunnels subjected to Rayleigh waves\",\"authors\":\"Ji Zhang , Hengyi Li , Chenyu Yan , Zigang Xu , Haiyang Zhuang , Baizan Tang , Guobo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shallow subway tunnels in both the intermediate and far fields are significantly affected by Rayleigh surface waves, which typically induce substantial vertical seismic motion and exhibit high seismic destructiveness. However, current vulnerability assessments of underground tunnels primarily focus on body waves. This study aims to identify the optimal ground motion intensity measures (IMs) for evaluating the seismic fragility of shallow circular subway tunnels subjected to Rayleigh waves. A detailed dynamic analysis of soil-tunnel interaction is performed using the two-dimensional Finite Element Method, with particular emphasis on the influence of tunnel burial depth and site classification on the tunnel’s response to Rayleigh waves. The input of Rayleigh wave motion is modeled by transforming the motion into a series of equivalent forces, applied through viscoelastic boundaries. This study examines 15 widely used ground motion IMs, with diameter deformation ratio (<em>DDR</em>) serving as the damage measure (DM). Linear regression analysis is conducted to explore the relationship between IMs and <em>DDR</em>. The optimal IMs are evaluated based on criteria including efficiency, practicality, proficiency, and correlation. The results indicate that for sites classified as Class III and IV, the optimal IM is root mean square velocity (<em>v</em><sub>rms</sub>), while for Class II sites, spectral mean velocity (SMV) is more suitable. Fragility curves for shallow-buried tunnels in Class II, III, and IV sites are presented. These curves demonstrate that tunnels are most vulnerable to damage in Class II sites, followed by Class IV, and least vulnerable in Class III sites. In Class II sites, shallower tunnel depths are associated with increased seismic damage, while deeper tunnels in Class III and IV sites experience greater seismic damage. The primary factor influencing seismic damage to tunnels is the vertical relative deformation of the surrounding soil layers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825001166\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825001166","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
浅层地铁隧道中、远场均受到瑞利面波的显著影响,瑞利面波通常诱发较大的垂直地震运动,具有较高的地震破坏性。然而,目前地下隧道的脆弱性评估主要集中在体波方面。本研究旨在确定用于评价瑞利波作用下浅埋圆形地铁隧道地震易损性的最佳地震动强度指标。采用二维有限元法对土-隧道相互作用进行了详细的动力分析,特别强调了隧道埋深和场地分类对隧道对瑞利波响应的影响。通过粘弹性边界将瑞利波运动转化为一系列等效力来模拟瑞利波运动的输入。本研究以直径变形比(DDR)作为损伤度量(DM),对15种广泛使用的地震动模型进行了分析。通过线性回归分析探讨IMs与DDR之间的关系。最优的IMs是根据包括效率、实用性、熟练度和相关性在内的标准来评估的。结果表明,对于III类和IV类站点,最优IM为均方根速度(root mean square velocity, vrms),而对于II类站点,最优IM为光谱平均速度(spectral mean velocity, SMV)。给出了ⅱ、ⅲ、ⅳ类遗址浅埋隧道的脆性曲线。这些曲线表明,II类遗址区隧道最易受到破坏,IV类遗址区次之,III类遗址区最不容易受到破坏。在第二类地点,较浅的隧道深度会增加地震破坏,而在第三类和第四类地点,较深的隧道会遭受更大的地震破坏。影响隧道地震破坏的主要因素是隧道周围土层的竖向相对变形。
Optimal intensity measures for fragility analysis of shallow circular subway tunnels subjected to Rayleigh waves
Shallow subway tunnels in both the intermediate and far fields are significantly affected by Rayleigh surface waves, which typically induce substantial vertical seismic motion and exhibit high seismic destructiveness. However, current vulnerability assessments of underground tunnels primarily focus on body waves. This study aims to identify the optimal ground motion intensity measures (IMs) for evaluating the seismic fragility of shallow circular subway tunnels subjected to Rayleigh waves. A detailed dynamic analysis of soil-tunnel interaction is performed using the two-dimensional Finite Element Method, with particular emphasis on the influence of tunnel burial depth and site classification on the tunnel’s response to Rayleigh waves. The input of Rayleigh wave motion is modeled by transforming the motion into a series of equivalent forces, applied through viscoelastic boundaries. This study examines 15 widely used ground motion IMs, with diameter deformation ratio (DDR) serving as the damage measure (DM). Linear regression analysis is conducted to explore the relationship between IMs and DDR. The optimal IMs are evaluated based on criteria including efficiency, practicality, proficiency, and correlation. The results indicate that for sites classified as Class III and IV, the optimal IM is root mean square velocity (vrms), while for Class II sites, spectral mean velocity (SMV) is more suitable. Fragility curves for shallow-buried tunnels in Class II, III, and IV sites are presented. These curves demonstrate that tunnels are most vulnerable to damage in Class II sites, followed by Class IV, and least vulnerable in Class III sites. In Class II sites, shallower tunnel depths are associated with increased seismic damage, while deeper tunnels in Class III and IV sites experience greater seismic damage. The primary factor influencing seismic damage to tunnels is the vertical relative deformation of the surrounding soil layers.
期刊介绍:
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.