私家医生采用电子健康记录互通系统(eHRSS)的相关因素

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Junjie Huang , Wing Sze Pang , Fung Yu Mak , Yuet Yan Wong , Sze Chai Chan , Yingxin Guan , Jonathan Poon , Ellen Tong , Clement SK Cheung , Wing Nam Wong , Ngai Tseung Cheung , Chung Ping Ho , Martin CS Wong
{"title":"私家医生采用电子健康记录互通系统(eHRSS)的相关因素","authors":"Junjie Huang ,&nbsp;Wing Sze Pang ,&nbsp;Fung Yu Mak ,&nbsp;Yuet Yan Wong ,&nbsp;Sze Chai Chan ,&nbsp;Yingxin Guan ,&nbsp;Jonathan Poon ,&nbsp;Ellen Tong ,&nbsp;Clement SK Cheung ,&nbsp;Wing Nam Wong ,&nbsp;Ngai Tseung Cheung ,&nbsp;Chung Ping Ho ,&nbsp;Martin CS Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.100995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to examine the adoption level of the electronic Medical Record (eMR) and Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS) among private physicians, and to establish areas for service improvement by evaluating the perception of the eHealth App.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Invitation emails containing the self-administered questionnaires link were sent out to private physicians, by referring to the eHRSS list and internet resources. A descriptive analysis was performed, the outcome variables (eMR, eHRSS, eHealth App) were expressed as proportions. Binary logistic regression models were constructed for the primary outcome variable and the secondary outcome variable.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 744 surveys were received. 78.5 % of the respondents adopted the eMR and 91.9 % joined the eHRSS. Among them, more than 90 % visited eHRSS regularly. ‘More technical support on data upload (61.7 %), ‘improve the friendliness of the interface (46.2 %), and ‘more cooperation between eHRSS and other medical systems’ (45.0 %) were potential factors that encourage data uploading. Type of practising [with partners/group practice: adjusted odd rate (aOR): 2.64, p&lt;0.001], and participation in eHRSS (aOR: 6.66, p&lt;0.001) were significant factors that increased the adoption of the eMR. Younger (aged≤ 30, aOR: 0.157, p&lt;0.041) and older age group (aged≥ 61, aOR: 0.403, p&lt;0.001) were less likely to adopt eMR. 79.9 % of them were aware of the eHealth App.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A generally high recognition of the eHRSS was found among physicians. Most physicians had an understanding and positive perception towards the eHealth App. It was noted that participation in eHRSS was significantly associated with the adoption of eMR.</div></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><div>This study aims to examine the adoption level of the electronic Medical Record (eMR) and eHRSS among private physicians, and to establish areas for service improvement by evaluating the perception of the eHealth App. The study adopts the form of questionnaire survey, and we will analyze the collected data. A generally high recognition of the eHRSS was found among physicians. Most physicians had an understanding and positive perception towards the eHealth App. Physicians demonstrated strong confidence in privacy and security, but were less satisfied with the technical support of the eHRSS. It was noted that participation in eHRSS was significantly associated with the adoption of eMR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 2","pages":"Article 100995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with adoption of electronic health record sharing system (eHRSS) among private physicians\",\"authors\":\"Junjie Huang ,&nbsp;Wing Sze Pang ,&nbsp;Fung Yu Mak ,&nbsp;Yuet Yan Wong ,&nbsp;Sze Chai Chan ,&nbsp;Yingxin Guan ,&nbsp;Jonathan Poon ,&nbsp;Ellen Tong ,&nbsp;Clement SK Cheung ,&nbsp;Wing Nam Wong ,&nbsp;Ngai Tseung Cheung ,&nbsp;Chung Ping Ho ,&nbsp;Martin CS Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.100995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to examine the adoption level of the electronic Medical Record (eMR) and Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS) among private physicians, and to establish areas for service improvement by evaluating the perception of the eHealth App.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Invitation emails containing the self-administered questionnaires link were sent out to private physicians, by referring to the eHRSS list and internet resources. A descriptive analysis was performed, the outcome variables (eMR, eHRSS, eHealth App) were expressed as proportions. Binary logistic regression models were constructed for the primary outcome variable and the secondary outcome variable.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 744 surveys were received. 78.5 % of the respondents adopted the eMR and 91.9 % joined the eHRSS. Among them, more than 90 % visited eHRSS regularly. ‘More technical support on data upload (61.7 %), ‘improve the friendliness of the interface (46.2 %), and ‘more cooperation between eHRSS and other medical systems’ (45.0 %) were potential factors that encourage data uploading. Type of practising [with partners/group practice: adjusted odd rate (aOR): 2.64, p&lt;0.001], and participation in eHRSS (aOR: 6.66, p&lt;0.001) were significant factors that increased the adoption of the eMR. Younger (aged≤ 30, aOR: 0.157, p&lt;0.041) and older age group (aged≥ 61, aOR: 0.403, p&lt;0.001) were less likely to adopt eMR. 79.9 % of them were aware of the eHealth App.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A generally high recognition of the eHRSS was found among physicians. Most physicians had an understanding and positive perception towards the eHealth App. It was noted that participation in eHRSS was significantly associated with the adoption of eMR.</div></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><div>This study aims to examine the adoption level of the electronic Medical Record (eMR) and eHRSS among private physicians, and to establish areas for service improvement by evaluating the perception of the eHealth App. The study adopts the form of questionnaire survey, and we will analyze the collected data. A generally high recognition of the eHRSS was found among physicians. Most physicians had an understanding and positive perception towards the eHealth App. Physicians demonstrated strong confidence in privacy and security, but were less satisfied with the technical support of the eHRSS. It was noted that participation in eHRSS was significantly associated with the adoption of eMR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with adoption of electronic health record sharing system (eHRSS) among private physicians

Objective

This study aims to examine the adoption level of the electronic Medical Record (eMR) and Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS) among private physicians, and to establish areas for service improvement by evaluating the perception of the eHealth App.

Methods

Invitation emails containing the self-administered questionnaires link were sent out to private physicians, by referring to the eHRSS list and internet resources. A descriptive analysis was performed, the outcome variables (eMR, eHRSS, eHealth App) were expressed as proportions. Binary logistic regression models were constructed for the primary outcome variable and the secondary outcome variable.

Results

A total of 744 surveys were received. 78.5 % of the respondents adopted the eMR and 91.9 % joined the eHRSS. Among them, more than 90 % visited eHRSS regularly. ‘More technical support on data upload (61.7 %), ‘improve the friendliness of the interface (46.2 %), and ‘more cooperation between eHRSS and other medical systems’ (45.0 %) were potential factors that encourage data uploading. Type of practising [with partners/group practice: adjusted odd rate (aOR): 2.64, p<0.001], and participation in eHRSS (aOR: 6.66, p<0.001) were significant factors that increased the adoption of the eMR. Younger (aged≤ 30, aOR: 0.157, p<0.041) and older age group (aged≥ 61, aOR: 0.403, p<0.001) were less likely to adopt eMR. 79.9 % of them were aware of the eHealth App.

Conclusions

A generally high recognition of the eHRSS was found among physicians. Most physicians had an understanding and positive perception towards the eHealth App. It was noted that participation in eHRSS was significantly associated with the adoption of eMR.

Public Interest Summary

This study aims to examine the adoption level of the electronic Medical Record (eMR) and eHRSS among private physicians, and to establish areas for service improvement by evaluating the perception of the eHealth App. The study adopts the form of questionnaire survey, and we will analyze the collected data. A generally high recognition of the eHRSS was found among physicians. Most physicians had an understanding and positive perception towards the eHealth App. Physicians demonstrated strong confidence in privacy and security, but were less satisfied with the technical support of the eHRSS. It was noted that participation in eHRSS was significantly associated with the adoption of eMR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信