“这是一剂疫苗,而不是像MMR那样的疫苗”:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,Twitter/X上出现了一种新型的疫苗特异性怀疑

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Elena Semino , Tara Coltman-Patel , William Dance , Zsófia Demjén , Richard Gleave , Alison Mackey
{"title":"“这是一剂疫苗,而不是像MMR那样的疫苗”:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,Twitter/X上出现了一种新型的疫苗特异性怀疑","authors":"Elena Semino ,&nbsp;Tara Coltman-Patel ,&nbsp;William Dance ,&nbsp;Zsófia Demjén ,&nbsp;Richard Gleave ,&nbsp;Alison Mackey","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.</div></span></li></ul></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Elena Semino ,&nbsp;Tara Coltman-Patel ,&nbsp;William Dance ,&nbsp;Zsófia Demjén ,&nbsp;Richard Gleave ,&nbsp;Alison Mackey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.</div></span></li></ul></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine: X\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然众所周知,疫苗犹豫可能是疫苗特异性的,但人们如何自发地对不同的疫苗进行比较,或者这种比较对疫苗态度的影响,却知之甚少。本文首先调查了2020-2022年在Twitter/X上发帖的人如何讨论MMR疫苗和COVID-19疫苗的相互关系。接下来,它揭示了疫苗怀疑主义的一种新表现,即声称某些疫苗,特别是针对COVID-19的疫苗,实际上不是疫苗。方法创建了一个900万字的“语料库”,由2008-2022年发布的包含MMR疫苗参考的推文组成。首先,在2020-2022年发布的推文(也包含COVID-19的参考)被编码为:(1)疫苗特异性评估,(2)疫苗相关主题。然后,对整个语料库进行分析,以寻找包含挑战疫苗作为疫苗状态的表达的推文(例如,“不是疫苗”,以及与“疫苗”相比使用“shot”)。结果在2020-2022年期间,推特上提到COVID-19和MMR疫苗时,越来越多的人倾向于将COVID-19疫苗与MMR疫苗进行不利的比较,因为他们认为抗感染效果较低。对整个语料库的进一步分析显示:•2020-2022年,将有挑战COVID-19疫苗以及流感疫苗作为疫苗地位的趋势;•2020-2022年,“注射”和“疫苗”之间存在明显对比,前者被描述为较差的医疗干预措施。•在2008-2019年期间,几乎没有证据表明对任何疫苗提出了类似的论点。Twitter/X的数据表明,对COVID-19疫苗抗感染有效性较低的看法导致人们认为它们不如MMR和其他疫苗,或者根本不是疫苗。重要的是要消除这种对主要预防严重疾病的疫苗的新形式的怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.

Methods

A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).

Results

In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:
  • A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;
  • A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.
  • Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.

Conclusion

Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信