抑制还是诱导?公众压力视角下碳排放交易机制对企业盈余管理的影响

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Shanglei Chai , Qianqian Zhou , Qiang Ji , Zuankuo Liu , Changyu Liu , Wenjun Chu
{"title":"抑制还是诱导?公众压力视角下碳排放交易机制对企业盈余管理的影响","authors":"Shanglei Chai ,&nbsp;Qianqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Qiang Ji ,&nbsp;Zuankuo Liu ,&nbsp;Changyu Liu ,&nbsp;Wenjun Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the burden of corporate environmental governance increases following the implementation of the carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS), companies may engage in earnings management to disguise their actual financial condition. The diminished authenticity of earnings information may damage the interests of other market participants. Utilizing the time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) method, this study examines the impact and mechanisms of ETS on corporate earnings management based on the data of China's listed companies. The findings reveal several key points. Firstly, ETS is positively correlated with corporate earnings management, indicating that ETS has an inducement effect on corporate earnings management, rather than an inhibition effect. Secondly, the relationship between ETS and corporate earnings management is negatively moderated by public pressure, including government environmental attention and media attention. After further distinguishing the media sentiment, this paper finds that more positive media sentiment can weaken the tendency of ETS to induce earnings management. Thirdly, heterogeneity analysis shows that the inducement effect is more significant in high competition industries and low analyst coverage companies. Finally, the mechanism tests show that ETS induces corporate earnings management through channels of corporate financial risk and debt financing cost. The study's findings provide policy recommendations for improving and monitoring the quality of corporate earnings information in the carbon trading market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 104019"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhibition or inducement? The impact of carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) on corporate earnings management from the perspective of public pressure\",\"authors\":\"Shanglei Chai ,&nbsp;Qianqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Qiang Ji ,&nbsp;Zuankuo Liu ,&nbsp;Changyu Liu ,&nbsp;Wenjun Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the burden of corporate environmental governance increases following the implementation of the carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS), companies may engage in earnings management to disguise their actual financial condition. The diminished authenticity of earnings information may damage the interests of other market participants. Utilizing the time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) method, this study examines the impact and mechanisms of ETS on corporate earnings management based on the data of China's listed companies. The findings reveal several key points. Firstly, ETS is positively correlated with corporate earnings management, indicating that ETS has an inducement effect on corporate earnings management, rather than an inhibition effect. Secondly, the relationship between ETS and corporate earnings management is negatively moderated by public pressure, including government environmental attention and media attention. After further distinguishing the media sentiment, this paper finds that more positive media sentiment can weaken the tendency of ETS to induce earnings management. Thirdly, heterogeneity analysis shows that the inducement effect is more significant in high competition industries and low analyst coverage companies. Finally, the mechanism tests show that ETS induces corporate earnings management through channels of corporate financial risk and debt financing cost. The study's findings provide policy recommendations for improving and monitoring the quality of corporate earnings information in the carbon trading market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001061\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着碳排放交易机制(ETS)的实施,公司环境治理的负担增加,公司可能会通过盈余管理来掩盖其实际财务状况。盈余信息真实性的降低可能会损害其他市场参与者的利益。本文利用时变差分法(DID),基于中国上市公司的数据,考察了ETS对公司盈余管理的影响及其机制。研究结果揭示了几个关键点。首先,ETS与公司盈余管理呈正相关,表明ETS对公司盈余管理具有诱导作用,而非抑制作用。其次,碳排放交易体系与公司盈余管理之间的关系受到公众压力(包括政府环境关注和媒体关注)的负向调节。在进一步区分媒体情绪后,本文发现更积极的媒体情绪可以削弱ETS诱导盈余管理的倾向。第三,异质性分析表明,在高竞争行业和低分析师覆盖率的公司中,诱导效应更为显著。最后,机制检验表明,ETS通过企业财务风险和债务融资成本两个渠道诱导企业盈余管理。研究结果为改善和监测碳交易市场中企业盈余信息的质量提供了政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inhibition or inducement? The impact of carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) on corporate earnings management from the perspective of public pressure
As the burden of corporate environmental governance increases following the implementation of the carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS), companies may engage in earnings management to disguise their actual financial condition. The diminished authenticity of earnings information may damage the interests of other market participants. Utilizing the time-varying difference-in-differences (DID) method, this study examines the impact and mechanisms of ETS on corporate earnings management based on the data of China's listed companies. The findings reveal several key points. Firstly, ETS is positively correlated with corporate earnings management, indicating that ETS has an inducement effect on corporate earnings management, rather than an inhibition effect. Secondly, the relationship between ETS and corporate earnings management is negatively moderated by public pressure, including government environmental attention and media attention. After further distinguishing the media sentiment, this paper finds that more positive media sentiment can weaken the tendency of ETS to induce earnings management. Thirdly, heterogeneity analysis shows that the inducement effect is more significant in high competition industries and low analyst coverage companies. Finally, the mechanism tests show that ETS induces corporate earnings management through channels of corporate financial risk and debt financing cost. The study's findings provide policy recommendations for improving and monitoring the quality of corporate earnings information in the carbon trading market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信