掺入稻壳灰替代水泥提高橡胶混凝土梁的抗弯性能

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Noha Hussein , Mohamed Abou Elmaaty , Mansour Alturki , Mahmoud Elsayed
{"title":"掺入稻壳灰替代水泥提高橡胶混凝土梁的抗弯性能","authors":"Noha Hussein ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abou Elmaaty ,&nbsp;Mansour Alturki ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Elsayed","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The quest for sustainable concrete production emphasizes human health and environmental safety while significantly reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions associated with traditional cement manufacturing, which is vital in combating climate change. Moreover, the novel application of by-products with pozzolanic properties not only diminishes environmental waste but also enhances the performance of concrete constructions. This research studies the sustainable application of crumb rubber (CR) and rice husk ash (RHA) in reinforced concrete (RC) beams. The research proposes a sustainable approach to mitigate the decreased flexural capacity in rubberized RC beams by incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) as a substitute for cement. Nine different concrete mixtures were designed with varying substitution ratios of RHA and CR as partial replacements for cement and fine aggregate (FA), respectively. The substitution ratios considered were 0 %, 10 %, or 20 % for RHA and 0 %, 5 %, or 10 % for CR by FA. Nine simply supported RC beams were cast and tested. The findings demonstrated that substituting cement with RHA at an ideal replacement ratio of 10 % enhanced the concrete strength, whereas the use of CR had a detrimental impact. The flexural capacity, stiffness, and toughness of the examined beams improved with the inclusion of RHA up to 10 %; they then declined with the inclusion of 20 % RHA but continued to be higher than those of the control specimen. The exploration of concrete mixture substitution ratios highlights a compelling balance between performance and sustainability. According to the experimental results, the best substitution ratio for the concrete mixture is a combination of 10 % RHA and 10 % CR, which only slightly reduces the ultimate load by 3.1 %. Finally, the experimental outcomes were compared with the predicted results of ACI 318–19 approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 119958"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing flexural performance of rubberized concrete beams through incorporation of rice husk ash as cement replacement\",\"authors\":\"Noha Hussein ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abou Elmaaty ,&nbsp;Mansour Alturki ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Elsayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The quest for sustainable concrete production emphasizes human health and environmental safety while significantly reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions associated with traditional cement manufacturing, which is vital in combating climate change. Moreover, the novel application of by-products with pozzolanic properties not only diminishes environmental waste but also enhances the performance of concrete constructions. This research studies the sustainable application of crumb rubber (CR) and rice husk ash (RHA) in reinforced concrete (RC) beams. The research proposes a sustainable approach to mitigate the decreased flexural capacity in rubberized RC beams by incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) as a substitute for cement. Nine different concrete mixtures were designed with varying substitution ratios of RHA and CR as partial replacements for cement and fine aggregate (FA), respectively. The substitution ratios considered were 0 %, 10 %, or 20 % for RHA and 0 %, 5 %, or 10 % for CR by FA. Nine simply supported RC beams were cast and tested. The findings demonstrated that substituting cement with RHA at an ideal replacement ratio of 10 % enhanced the concrete strength, whereas the use of CR had a detrimental impact. The flexural capacity, stiffness, and toughness of the examined beams improved with the inclusion of RHA up to 10 %; they then declined with the inclusion of 20 % RHA but continued to be higher than those of the control specimen. The exploration of concrete mixture substitution ratios highlights a compelling balance between performance and sustainability. According to the experimental results, the best substitution ratio for the concrete mixture is a combination of 10 % RHA and 10 % CR, which only slightly reduces the ultimate load by 3.1 %. Finally, the experimental outcomes were compared with the predicted results of ACI 318–19 approaches.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"330 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625003499\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625003499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

追求可持续混凝土生产强调人类健康和环境安全,同时显著减少与传统水泥生产相关的二氧化碳排放,这对应对气候变化至关重要。此外,具有火山灰特性的副产物的新应用不仅减少了环境浪费,而且提高了混凝土结构的性能。本文研究了橡胶屑(CR)和稻壳灰(RHA)在混凝土梁中的可持续应用。该研究提出了一种可持续的方法,以减轻橡胶混凝土梁的抗弯能力下降,通过加入稻壳灰(RHA)作为水泥的替代品。设计了9种不同的混凝土配合比,分别采用不同的RHA和CR替代水泥和细骨料(FA)。RHA替代率为0 %、10 %或20 %,FA替代率为0 %、5 %或10 %。9根简支RC梁进行浇铸和试验。结果表明,理想替代率为10% %的RHA可提高混凝土强度,而CR的使用则会产生不利影响。受测梁的抗弯能力、刚度和韧性随着RHA的加入而提高,RHA含量可达10 %;加入20% % RHA后,它们有所下降,但仍高于对照标本。混凝土混合料替代率的探索强调了性能和可持续性之间的令人信服的平衡。试验结果表明,最佳替代比为10 % RHA和10 % CR的组合,仅能略微降低3.1 %的极限荷载。最后,将实验结果与ACI 318-19方法的预测结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing flexural performance of rubberized concrete beams through incorporation of rice husk ash as cement replacement
The quest for sustainable concrete production emphasizes human health and environmental safety while significantly reducing CO2 emissions associated with traditional cement manufacturing, which is vital in combating climate change. Moreover, the novel application of by-products with pozzolanic properties not only diminishes environmental waste but also enhances the performance of concrete constructions. This research studies the sustainable application of crumb rubber (CR) and rice husk ash (RHA) in reinforced concrete (RC) beams. The research proposes a sustainable approach to mitigate the decreased flexural capacity in rubberized RC beams by incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) as a substitute for cement. Nine different concrete mixtures were designed with varying substitution ratios of RHA and CR as partial replacements for cement and fine aggregate (FA), respectively. The substitution ratios considered were 0 %, 10 %, or 20 % for RHA and 0 %, 5 %, or 10 % for CR by FA. Nine simply supported RC beams were cast and tested. The findings demonstrated that substituting cement with RHA at an ideal replacement ratio of 10 % enhanced the concrete strength, whereas the use of CR had a detrimental impact. The flexural capacity, stiffness, and toughness of the examined beams improved with the inclusion of RHA up to 10 %; they then declined with the inclusion of 20 % RHA but continued to be higher than those of the control specimen. The exploration of concrete mixture substitution ratios highlights a compelling balance between performance and sustainability. According to the experimental results, the best substitution ratio for the concrete mixture is a combination of 10 % RHA and 10 % CR, which only slightly reduces the ultimate load by 3.1 %. Finally, the experimental outcomes were compared with the predicted results of ACI 318–19 approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信