基于机器学习的耕地氧化亚氮排放预测:作为预测变量的管理实践探索

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gregor Gnisia , Jan Weik , Reiner Ruser , Lisa Essich , Iris Lewandowski , Anthony Stein
{"title":"基于机器学习的耕地氧化亚氮排放预测:作为预测变量的管理实践探索","authors":"Gregor Gnisia ,&nbsp;Jan Weik ,&nbsp;Reiner Ruser ,&nbsp;Lisa Essich ,&nbsp;Iris Lewandowski ,&nbsp;Anthony Stein","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural activities significantly contribute to the global greenhouse gas balance, with approximately 60 % originating from agricultural soils, primarily due to nitrogen fertilizer application. Estimating these emissions from croplands for national reporting and mitigation strategies presents a complex challenge, considering the intricate interplay of meteorological factors, soil conditions, and management practices governing microbial processes such as nitrification and denitrification. Current estimation methods, including the 1 % IPCC approach and process-based models, face limitations due to incomplete process representation, parameter uncertainties, and complex initialization procedures.</div><div>This study explores the potential of machine learning to improve the prediction of nitrous oxide emissions. We evaluated three machine learning algorithms (Random forest (RF), Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Feedforward neural network (FNN)) for their ability to predict weekly fluxes, peak flux, and annual emissions using data from a field study with seven different management treatments. A comprehensive set of predictor variables, including meteorological, soil, and management factors, was utilized.</div><div>Cross-validation results demonstrate the superior performance of the RF model, achieving a root mean squared error of 8.51, surpassing the XGBoost model (9.28) and FNN model (9.08).</div><div>Remarkably, analysis of cumulative emissions reveals that the FNN model, in particular, exhibits better predictive capability for annual trends compared to other models, with 72.5 % of predictions falling within the standard error range. The inclusion of agricultural management variables such as “Days after Hoeing” emerged as the dominant predictor, contributing to 40 % (RF)/55 % (XGBoost) of the prediction accuracy. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning to become a robust, and time-efficient method for predicting N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes at different scales. Due to its potential generalizability, the large-scale application, e.g. for national greenhouse gas reporting, is envisioned. This requires further training with data from multiple locations with different site factors and land uses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113233"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based prediction of nitrous oxide emissions from arable farming: Exploring management practices as predictor variables\",\"authors\":\"Gregor Gnisia ,&nbsp;Jan Weik ,&nbsp;Reiner Ruser ,&nbsp;Lisa Essich ,&nbsp;Iris Lewandowski ,&nbsp;Anthony Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural activities significantly contribute to the global greenhouse gas balance, with approximately 60 % originating from agricultural soils, primarily due to nitrogen fertilizer application. Estimating these emissions from croplands for national reporting and mitigation strategies presents a complex challenge, considering the intricate interplay of meteorological factors, soil conditions, and management practices governing microbial processes such as nitrification and denitrification. Current estimation methods, including the 1 % IPCC approach and process-based models, face limitations due to incomplete process representation, parameter uncertainties, and complex initialization procedures.</div><div>This study explores the potential of machine learning to improve the prediction of nitrous oxide emissions. We evaluated three machine learning algorithms (Random forest (RF), Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Feedforward neural network (FNN)) for their ability to predict weekly fluxes, peak flux, and annual emissions using data from a field study with seven different management treatments. A comprehensive set of predictor variables, including meteorological, soil, and management factors, was utilized.</div><div>Cross-validation results demonstrate the superior performance of the RF model, achieving a root mean squared error of 8.51, surpassing the XGBoost model (9.28) and FNN model (9.08).</div><div>Remarkably, analysis of cumulative emissions reveals that the FNN model, in particular, exhibits better predictive capability for annual trends compared to other models, with 72.5 % of predictions falling within the standard error range. The inclusion of agricultural management variables such as “Days after Hoeing” emerged as the dominant predictor, contributing to 40 % (RF)/55 % (XGBoost) of the prediction accuracy. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning to become a robust, and time-efficient method for predicting N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes at different scales. Due to its potential generalizability, the large-scale application, e.g. for national greenhouse gas reporting, is envisioned. This requires further training with data from multiple locations with different site factors and land uses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001621\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业活动排放的一氧化二氮对全球温室气体平衡做出了重大贡献,其中约60%来自农业土壤,主要是由于氮肥的施用。考虑到气象因素、土壤条件和控制微生物过程(如硝化和反硝化)的管理做法之间错综复杂的相互作用,为国家报告和减缓战略估算这些农田排放是一项复杂的挑战。目前的估计方法,包括1% IPCC方法和基于过程的模型,由于过程表示不完整、参数不确定性和复杂的初始化程序而面临局限性。这项研究探索了机器学习在改善一氧化二氮排放预测方面的潜力。我们评估了三种机器学习算法(随机森林(RF)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)和前馈神经网络(FNN))预测周通量、峰值通量和年排放量的能力,使用了7种不同管理处理的现场研究数据。利用了一套综合的预测变量,包括气象、土壤和管理因素。交叉验证结果表明,RF模型具有优越的性能,其均方根误差为8.51,超过了XGBoost模型(9.28)和FNN模型(9.08)。值得注意的是,对累积排放量的分析表明,与其他模型相比,FNN模型对年度趋势的预测能力更好,预测结果的72.5%落在标准误差范围内。包括农业管理变量,如“锄地后的天数”成为主要的预测因子,贡献了40% (RF)/ 55% (XGBoost)的预测精度。这些结果表明,机器学习有潜力成为预测不同尺度N2O通量的一种鲁棒且省时的方法。由于其潜在的通用性,预计将大规模应用,例如国家温室气体报告。这需要进一步训练来自不同场地因素和土地用途的多个地点的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine learning-based prediction of nitrous oxide emissions from arable farming: Exploring management practices as predictor variables

Machine learning-based prediction of nitrous oxide emissions from arable farming: Exploring management practices as predictor variables
Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural activities significantly contribute to the global greenhouse gas balance, with approximately 60 % originating from agricultural soils, primarily due to nitrogen fertilizer application. Estimating these emissions from croplands for national reporting and mitigation strategies presents a complex challenge, considering the intricate interplay of meteorological factors, soil conditions, and management practices governing microbial processes such as nitrification and denitrification. Current estimation methods, including the 1 % IPCC approach and process-based models, face limitations due to incomplete process representation, parameter uncertainties, and complex initialization procedures.
This study explores the potential of machine learning to improve the prediction of nitrous oxide emissions. We evaluated three machine learning algorithms (Random forest (RF), Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Feedforward neural network (FNN)) for their ability to predict weekly fluxes, peak flux, and annual emissions using data from a field study with seven different management treatments. A comprehensive set of predictor variables, including meteorological, soil, and management factors, was utilized.
Cross-validation results demonstrate the superior performance of the RF model, achieving a root mean squared error of 8.51, surpassing the XGBoost model (9.28) and FNN model (9.08).
Remarkably, analysis of cumulative emissions reveals that the FNN model, in particular, exhibits better predictive capability for annual trends compared to other models, with 72.5 % of predictions falling within the standard error range. The inclusion of agricultural management variables such as “Days after Hoeing” emerged as the dominant predictor, contributing to 40 % (RF)/55 % (XGBoost) of the prediction accuracy. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning to become a robust, and time-efficient method for predicting N2O fluxes at different scales. Due to its potential generalizability, the large-scale application, e.g. for national greenhouse gas reporting, is envisioned. This requires further training with data from multiple locations with different site factors and land uses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信