Lígia Passos, João Tavares, Melissa Batchelor, Daniela Figueiredo
{"title":"Effectiveness of an educational intervention on mealtime support needs for people with dementia in residential care facilities: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lígia Passos, João Tavares, Melissa Batchelor, Daniela Figueiredo","doi":"10.1177/14713012251323658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with dementia face numerous challenges during mealtimes, including difficulties with food intake, cutlery use, and maintaining attention. These can lead to severe consequences such as malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, affecting the well-being of these individuals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention in improving mealtime support needs and enhancing the well-being of both individuals with dementia and direct care workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in four residential care facilities. The study involved direct care workers and residents with dementia, with facilities randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group. The intervention comprised three weekly 2-hour training sessions, focusing on dementia-related mealtime challenges and practical support strategies. Data were collected at baseline and one-week post-intervention using questionnaires and observational tools to assess caregivers' skills, burnout levels, and job satisfaction, as well as residents' mealtime behavior and food intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct care workers from the intervention group showed significant improvements in knowledge (<i>p</i> < .001; d = 0.728) and skills (<i>p</i> < .001; d = 0.842) compared to the control group. Additionally, there were notable reductions in burnout levels (<i>p</i> = .001; d = 0.466) and higher job satisfaction (<i>p</i> = .003; d = 0.410). People with dementia in the intervention group demonstrated better performance at mealtimes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The educational intervention effectively enhanced direct care workers' abilities to support people with dementia during mealtimes, leading to better outcomes for both caregivers and residents. Implementing such training programs can improve care quality and alleviate challenges in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251323658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251323658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:痴呆症患者在进餐时面临许多挑战,包括食物摄入、餐具使用和保持注意力方面的困难。目的:确定教育干预对改善进餐时间支持需求和提高痴呆症患者及直接护理人员福祉的有效性:方法:在四家安老院进行了分组随机对照试验。研究对象包括直接护理人员和患有痴呆症的居民,这些机构被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预措施包括每周三次、每次两小时的培训课程,重点是与痴呆症相关的进餐挑战和实用的支持策略。通过问卷调查和观察工具收集基线和干预后一周的数据,以评估护理人员的技能、职业倦怠程度和工作满意度,以及居民的进餐行为和食物摄入量:与对照组相比,干预组的直接护理人员在知识(p < .001; d = 0.728)和技能(p < .001; d = 0.842)方面均有显著提高。此外,倦怠程度明显降低(p = .001;d = 0.466),工作满意度提高(p = .003;d = 0.410)。干预组的痴呆症患者在用餐时表现更好:教育干预有效提高了直接护理人员在用餐时间为痴呆症患者提供支持的能力,从而为护理人员和居民带来更好的结果。实施此类培训计划可以提高护理质量,缓解痴呆症护理中的挑战。
Effectiveness of an educational intervention on mealtime support needs for people with dementia in residential care facilities: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Background: People with dementia face numerous challenges during mealtimes, including difficulties with food intake, cutlery use, and maintaining attention. These can lead to severe consequences such as malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, affecting the well-being of these individuals.
Aim: To determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention in improving mealtime support needs and enhancing the well-being of both individuals with dementia and direct care workers.
Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in four residential care facilities. The study involved direct care workers and residents with dementia, with facilities randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group. The intervention comprised three weekly 2-hour training sessions, focusing on dementia-related mealtime challenges and practical support strategies. Data were collected at baseline and one-week post-intervention using questionnaires and observational tools to assess caregivers' skills, burnout levels, and job satisfaction, as well as residents' mealtime behavior and food intake.
Results: Direct care workers from the intervention group showed significant improvements in knowledge (p < .001; d = 0.728) and skills (p < .001; d = 0.842) compared to the control group. Additionally, there were notable reductions in burnout levels (p = .001; d = 0.466) and higher job satisfaction (p = .003; d = 0.410). People with dementia in the intervention group demonstrated better performance at mealtimes.
Conclusion: The educational intervention effectively enhanced direct care workers' abilities to support people with dementia during mealtimes, leading to better outcomes for both caregivers and residents. Implementing such training programs can improve care quality and alleviate challenges in dementia care.