Jian Li, Rong Tan, Bing Yang, Changpu Du, Jie Tian, Zhu Yang, Dongxin Tang
{"title":"遗传证据表明EBV感染与多发性骨髓瘤风险之间存在因果关系。","authors":"Jian Li, Rong Tan, Bing Yang, Changpu Du, Jie Tian, Zhu Yang, Dongxin Tang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-90479-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous observational studies have suggested a potential association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the development of multiple myeloma (MM), but this relationship is not clear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationship between EBV infection and the risk of MM, while exploring the possible mediating role of immune cells in this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study first conducted a two-sample MR analysis using the MM R11 dataset from the FinnGen Consortium to evaluate the causal relationship between five EBV infection-related antibodies (AEB-IgG, EA-D, EBNA-1, VCA-p18, and ZEBRA) and MM, with validation in the MM R10 dataset. A reverse MR analysis was then performed. For significant results, multivariable MR (MVMR) was used to adjust for the effects of confounding risk factors. Next, a two-step MR mediation analysis was applied to investigate the potential mediating role of 731 immune cell types between positive exposure and MM. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-sample MR study found that EBNA-1 antibodies (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.73; P = 0.015) were associated with an increased risk of MM, with similar results observed in the FinnGen Consortium R10 replication study. Although the association did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment (P_fdr = 0.075), further adjustment for relevant confounders using multivariable MR (MVMR) demonstrated that EBNA-1 antibodies (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01-1.75; P = 0.041) were still significantly associated with an increased risk of MM. Reverse MR analysis indicated no causal effect of MM on EBV-related antibodies. A two-sample MR analysis involving 731 immune cell phenotypes identified 27 potential mediating cell types. Ultimately, two-step MR confirmed that HLA-DR on myeloid dendritic cells (HLA-DR⁺ mDC) serves as a mediating factor, with EBNA-1 antibodies downregulating HLA-DR⁺ mDC, thereby increasing MM risk. Multiple sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that EBNA-1 antibodies may increase the risk of MM by downregulating HLA-DR⁺ mDC. This indicates that chronic EBV infection may contribute to an elevated risk of MM. We hope these results provide new insights for future research on the prevention and treatment of MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"6357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic evidence identifies a causal relationship between EBV infection and multiple myeloma risk.\",\"authors\":\"Jian Li, Rong Tan, Bing Yang, Changpu Du, Jie Tian, Zhu Yang, Dongxin Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-90479-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous observational studies have suggested a potential association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the development of multiple myeloma (MM), but this relationship is not clear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationship between EBV infection and the risk of MM, while exploring the possible mediating role of immune cells in this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study first conducted a two-sample MR analysis using the MM R11 dataset from the FinnGen Consortium to evaluate the causal relationship between five EBV infection-related antibodies (AEB-IgG, EA-D, EBNA-1, VCA-p18, and ZEBRA) and MM, with validation in the MM R10 dataset. A reverse MR analysis was then performed. For significant results, multivariable MR (MVMR) was used to adjust for the effects of confounding risk factors. Next, a two-step MR mediation analysis was applied to investigate the potential mediating role of 731 immune cell types between positive exposure and MM. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-sample MR study found that EBNA-1 antibodies (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.73; P = 0.015) were associated with an increased risk of MM, with similar results observed in the FinnGen Consortium R10 replication study. Although the association did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment (P_fdr = 0.075), further adjustment for relevant confounders using multivariable MR (MVMR) demonstrated that EBNA-1 antibodies (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01-1.75; P = 0.041) were still significantly associated with an increased risk of MM. Reverse MR analysis indicated no causal effect of MM on EBV-related antibodies. A two-sample MR analysis involving 731 immune cell phenotypes identified 27 potential mediating cell types. Ultimately, two-step MR confirmed that HLA-DR on myeloid dendritic cells (HLA-DR⁺ mDC) serves as a mediating factor, with EBNA-1 antibodies downregulating HLA-DR⁺ mDC, thereby increasing MM risk. Multiple sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that EBNA-1 antibodies may increase the risk of MM by downregulating HLA-DR⁺ mDC. This indicates that chronic EBV infection may contribute to an elevated risk of MM. We hope these results provide new insights for future research on the prevention and treatment of MM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"6357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90479-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90479-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic evidence identifies a causal relationship between EBV infection and multiple myeloma risk.
Background: Previous observational studies have suggested a potential association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the development of multiple myeloma (MM), but this relationship is not clear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal relationship between EBV infection and the risk of MM, while exploring the possible mediating role of immune cells in this association.
Methods: The study first conducted a two-sample MR analysis using the MM R11 dataset from the FinnGen Consortium to evaluate the causal relationship between five EBV infection-related antibodies (AEB-IgG, EA-D, EBNA-1, VCA-p18, and ZEBRA) and MM, with validation in the MM R10 dataset. A reverse MR analysis was then performed. For significant results, multivariable MR (MVMR) was used to adjust for the effects of confounding risk factors. Next, a two-step MR mediation analysis was applied to investigate the potential mediating role of 731 immune cell types between positive exposure and MM. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.
Results: A two-sample MR study found that EBNA-1 antibodies (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.06-1.73; P = 0.015) were associated with an increased risk of MM, with similar results observed in the FinnGen Consortium R10 replication study. Although the association did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment (P_fdr = 0.075), further adjustment for relevant confounders using multivariable MR (MVMR) demonstrated that EBNA-1 antibodies (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01-1.75; P = 0.041) were still significantly associated with an increased risk of MM. Reverse MR analysis indicated no causal effect of MM on EBV-related antibodies. A two-sample MR analysis involving 731 immune cell phenotypes identified 27 potential mediating cell types. Ultimately, two-step MR confirmed that HLA-DR on myeloid dendritic cells (HLA-DR⁺ mDC) serves as a mediating factor, with EBNA-1 antibodies downregulating HLA-DR⁺ mDC, thereby increasing MM risk. Multiple sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings.
Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that EBNA-1 antibodies may increase the risk of MM by downregulating HLA-DR⁺ mDC. This indicates that chronic EBV infection may contribute to an elevated risk of MM. We hope these results provide new insights for future research on the prevention and treatment of MM.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.