局部晚期胰腺癌患者接受一线化疗的反应深度:JCOG1407的补充分析

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Taro Shibuki , Masafumi Ikeda , Masayuki Yokoyama , Yusuke Sano , Junji Furuse , Satoshi Kobayashi , Akihiro Ohba , Akiko Todaka , Yoshiki Horie , Kazuhiko Shioji , Masashi Kanai , Tomohiro Nishina , Yusuke Kumamoto , Nao Fujimori , Akio Katanuma , Yukiko Takayama , Hidetaka Tsumura , Haruo Miwa , Masato Ozaka , Makoto Ueno
{"title":"局部晚期胰腺癌患者接受一线化疗的反应深度:JCOG1407的补充分析","authors":"Taro Shibuki ,&nbsp;Masafumi Ikeda ,&nbsp;Masayuki Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sano ,&nbsp;Junji Furuse ,&nbsp;Satoshi Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Akihiro Ohba ,&nbsp;Akiko Todaka ,&nbsp;Yoshiki Horie ,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Shioji ,&nbsp;Masashi Kanai ,&nbsp;Tomohiro Nishina ,&nbsp;Yusuke Kumamoto ,&nbsp;Nao Fujimori ,&nbsp;Akio Katanuma ,&nbsp;Yukiko Takayama ,&nbsp;Hidetaka Tsumura ,&nbsp;Haruo Miwa ,&nbsp;Masato Ozaka ,&nbsp;Makoto Ueno","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients’ backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (&lt;−37.2 %), T2 (−37.2 to −13.6 %), and T3 (&gt;−13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (−28.9 vs. −22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268–0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217–0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depth of response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: A supplementary analysis of JCOG1407\",\"authors\":\"Taro Shibuki ,&nbsp;Masafumi Ikeda ,&nbsp;Masayuki Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sano ,&nbsp;Junji Furuse ,&nbsp;Satoshi Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Akihiro Ohba ,&nbsp;Akiko Todaka ,&nbsp;Yoshiki Horie ,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Shioji ,&nbsp;Masashi Kanai ,&nbsp;Tomohiro Nishina ,&nbsp;Yusuke Kumamoto ,&nbsp;Nao Fujimori ,&nbsp;Akio Katanuma ,&nbsp;Yukiko Takayama ,&nbsp;Hidetaka Tsumura ,&nbsp;Haruo Miwa ,&nbsp;Masato Ozaka ,&nbsp;Makoto Ueno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients’ backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (&lt;−37.2 %), T2 (−37.2 to −13.6 %), and T3 (&gt;−13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (−28.9 vs. −22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268–0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217–0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 275-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S142439032500033X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S142439032500033X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:深度响应(DpR;从基线到目标病变直径总和的最大缩小%已被证明在预测几种恶性肿瘤的预后方面具有潜力。然而,其在局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)中的作用尚不清楚。在JCOG1407中,改良的FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX)和吉西他滨加nab-紫杉醇(GnP)对LAPC的疗效相当。在这项使用JCOG1407数据的探索性分析中,我们重点研究了DpR与预后之间的关系。方法:将DpR分为三组,并比较患者的背景和生存情况。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估DpR对生存结果的影响。结果:在JCOG1407纳入的126例患者中,109例患者被纳入,分为3个DpR组:T1(- 13.6%)。GnP组的中位DpR显著高于mFOLFIRINOX组(-28.9 vs - 22.7%, P = 0.041)。虽然差异不显著(5.3个月对8.2个月,P = 0.132),但GnP组的中位反应持续时间往往短于mFOLFIRINOX组。大DpR (T1)对更好的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响显著大于T3,风险比分别为0.469(95%可信区间[CI] 0.268-0.821, P = 0.008)和0.398 (95% CI 0.217-0.728, P = 0.003)。结论:mFOLFIRINOX和GnP具有相似的OS,值得注意的是,两种方案在DpR方面存在差异,GnP导致更大的DpR。更大的DpR与LAPC患者的生存率提高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Depth of response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: A supplementary analysis of JCOG1407

Background/objectives

Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.

Methods

DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients’ backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (<−37.2 %), T2 (−37.2 to −13.6 %), and T3 (>−13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (−28.9 vs. −22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268–0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217–0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.

Conclusions

mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信