Patrick F O'Brien, Saige A Teti, Callum Dewar, Kristen Stabingas, Md Sohel Rana, Suresh N Magge, Daniel A Donoho, Hasan R Syed, Chima Oluigbo, John S Myseros, Gary F Rogers, Robert F Keating
{"title":"内镜下矢状缝切的最佳时机。","authors":"Patrick F O'Brien, Saige A Teti, Callum Dewar, Kristen Stabingas, Md Sohel Rana, Suresh N Magge, Daniel A Donoho, Hasan R Syed, Chima Oluigbo, John S Myseros, Gary F Rogers, Robert F Keating","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) is commonly offered for sagittal craniosynostosis in infants, but the optimal timing of surgery remains controversial, with many clinicians only offering ESS surgery before 3 months of age. This study investigated whether patient age predicts craniometric correction and, more specifically, whether patients > 3 months of age at surgery manifest less correction. The effects of age on blood transfusion were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review identifying patients with sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent ESS between 2009 and 2023 at Children's National Medical Center was performed. The authors stratified patients by age groups to compare outcomes and transfusion rates. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed to identify optimal age cutoffs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 107 patients were included. Stratifying age group by 0-2 months, 2-3 months, and > 3 months revealed that the > 3-month age group was less likely to achieve the target cephalic index (CI) at the final follow-up (48.8% vs 61.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.031) and had less mean percentage CI change at the 6-month follow-up (17% ± 8% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.011), helmet discontinuation (18% ± 9% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.008), 1-year follow-up (15% ± 9% vs 17% ± 7% vs 10% ± 7%, p = 0.005), and final follow-up (14% ± 9% vs 15% ± 7% vs 8% ± 7%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-2 months versus > 2 months of age. The only difference in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-3 months versus > 3 months of age was the mean percentage change in CI at helmet removal (18% ± 8% vs 15% ± 7%, p = 0.044). Patients requiring transfusion were likely to be younger (median age 2 vs 3 months, p = 0.028). ROC curve analysis identified an age cut-point of 3.75 months as optimal for achieving the target CI correction at the final follow-up (AUC 0.58) and 2.75 months for transfusion avoidance (AUC 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients > 3 months of age may benefit from ESS for sagittal craniosynostosis. Further investigation is warranted to identify the optimal age for surgery and to investigate other variables influencing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"436-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal timing of endoscopic sagittal suturectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick F O'Brien, Saige A Teti, Callum Dewar, Kristen Stabingas, Md Sohel Rana, Suresh N Magge, Daniel A Donoho, Hasan R Syed, Chima Oluigbo, John S Myseros, Gary F Rogers, Robert F Keating\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) is commonly offered for sagittal craniosynostosis in infants, but the optimal timing of surgery remains controversial, with many clinicians only offering ESS surgery before 3 months of age. This study investigated whether patient age predicts craniometric correction and, more specifically, whether patients > 3 months of age at surgery manifest less correction. The effects of age on blood transfusion were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review identifying patients with sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent ESS between 2009 and 2023 at Children's National Medical Center was performed. The authors stratified patients by age groups to compare outcomes and transfusion rates. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed to identify optimal age cutoffs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 107 patients were included. Stratifying age group by 0-2 months, 2-3 months, and > 3 months revealed that the > 3-month age group was less likely to achieve the target cephalic index (CI) at the final follow-up (48.8% vs 61.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.031) and had less mean percentage CI change at the 6-month follow-up (17% ± 8% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.011), helmet discontinuation (18% ± 9% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.008), 1-year follow-up (15% ± 9% vs 17% ± 7% vs 10% ± 7%, p = 0.005), and final follow-up (14% ± 9% vs 15% ± 7% vs 8% ± 7%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-2 months versus > 2 months of age. The only difference in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-3 months versus > 3 months of age was the mean percentage change in CI at helmet removal (18% ± 8% vs 15% ± 7%, p = 0.044). Patients requiring transfusion were likely to be younger (median age 2 vs 3 months, p = 0.028). ROC curve analysis identified an age cut-point of 3.75 months as optimal for achieving the target CI correction at the final follow-up (AUC 0.58) and 2.75 months for transfusion avoidance (AUC 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients > 3 months of age may benefit from ESS for sagittal craniosynostosis. Further investigation is warranted to identify the optimal age for surgery and to investigate other variables influencing outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"436-441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24272\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:内窥镜矢状缝切术(ESS)通常用于婴儿矢状颅缝闭塞,但手术的最佳时机仍然存在争议,许多临床医生只在3个月前进行ESS手术。本研究调查了患者的年龄是否能预测颅骨矫正,更具体地说,是否手术时年龄为0 - 3个月的患者表现出较少的矫正。研究了年龄对输血的影响。方法:对2009年至2023年在国家儿童医疗中心接受ESS治疗的矢状颅缝闭塞患者进行单中心回顾性分析。作者将患者按年龄组分层,比较结果和输血率。此外,还进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分析,以确定最佳年龄截止点。结果:共纳入107例患者。分层年龄0 - 2个月,2 - 3个月,和显示> > 3个月3个月年龄组是不太可能实现的目标头指数(CI)在最后的随访(48.8% vs 61.5%比25.0%,p = 0.031),减少意味着CI百分比变化在6个月随访(17%±8% vs 18%±8% vs 12%±6%,p = 0.011),头盔中止(18%±9% vs 18%±8% vs 12%±6%,p = 0.008), 1年随访(15%±9% vs 17%±7% vs 10%±7%,p = 0.005),最终随访(14%±9% vs 15%±7% vs 8%±7%,p = 0.004)。在0-2月龄组与0-2月龄组之间的结果没有差异。0-3月龄组与0-3月龄组之间的唯一差异是取下头盔时CI的平均百分比变化(18%±8% vs 15%±7%,p = 0.044)。需要输血的患者可能更年轻(中位年龄2个月vs 3个月,p = 0.028)。ROC曲线分析确定3.75个月的年龄切点是最终随访时实现目标CI校正(AUC 0.58)的最佳年龄切点,2.75个月是避免输血(AUC 0.65)的最佳年龄切点。结论:0 ~ 3个月大的患者可能受益于ESS治疗矢状颅缝闭塞。需要进一步的研究来确定手术的最佳年龄,并研究影响结果的其他变量。
Optimal timing of endoscopic sagittal suturectomy.
Objective: Endoscopic sagittal suturectomy (ESS) is commonly offered for sagittal craniosynostosis in infants, but the optimal timing of surgery remains controversial, with many clinicians only offering ESS surgery before 3 months of age. This study investigated whether patient age predicts craniometric correction and, more specifically, whether patients > 3 months of age at surgery manifest less correction. The effects of age on blood transfusion were also investigated.
Methods: A single-center retrospective review identifying patients with sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent ESS between 2009 and 2023 at Children's National Medical Center was performed. The authors stratified patients by age groups to compare outcomes and transfusion rates. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed to identify optimal age cutoffs.
Results: In total, 107 patients were included. Stratifying age group by 0-2 months, 2-3 months, and > 3 months revealed that the > 3-month age group was less likely to achieve the target cephalic index (CI) at the final follow-up (48.8% vs 61.5% vs 25.0%, p = 0.031) and had less mean percentage CI change at the 6-month follow-up (17% ± 8% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.011), helmet discontinuation (18% ± 9% vs 18% ± 8% vs 12% ± 6%, p = 0.008), 1-year follow-up (15% ± 9% vs 17% ± 7% vs 10% ± 7%, p = 0.005), and final follow-up (14% ± 9% vs 15% ± 7% vs 8% ± 7%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-2 months versus > 2 months of age. The only difference in outcomes between groups when stratified as 0-3 months versus > 3 months of age was the mean percentage change in CI at helmet removal (18% ± 8% vs 15% ± 7%, p = 0.044). Patients requiring transfusion were likely to be younger (median age 2 vs 3 months, p = 0.028). ROC curve analysis identified an age cut-point of 3.75 months as optimal for achieving the target CI correction at the final follow-up (AUC 0.58) and 2.75 months for transfusion avoidance (AUC 0.65).
Conclusions: Patients > 3 months of age may benefit from ESS for sagittal craniosynostosis. Further investigation is warranted to identify the optimal age for surgery and to investigate other variables influencing outcomes.