测量印度北部糖尿病视网膜病变患者的生活质量:通用仪器和视力专用仪器的比较。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Neha Purohit, Aarti Goyal, Vishali Gupta, Parul Chawla Gupta, Prakash Singh, Shankar Prinja
{"title":"测量印度北部糖尿病视网膜病变患者的生活质量:通用仪器和视力专用仪器的比较。","authors":"Neha Purohit, Aarti Goyal, Vishali Gupta, Parul Chawla Gupta, Prakash Singh, Shankar Prinja","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02340-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients is important to assess the impact of disease, to monitor the treatment outcomes, and conduct health technology assessments. The study aimed to measure the HRQoL in DR patients using the generic as well as disease specific instruments, identify the determinants of HRQoL, empirically investigate the concurrent validity between the QoL instruments, and to develop statistical approaches to map NEI-VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute- Visual Function Questionnaire- 25) composite score based on EQ-5D-5 L (EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels) utility values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility based cross-sectional study was carried out to measure the HRQoL of 300 DR patients using EQ-5D-5 L, EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and NEI-VFQ-25 instruments. Mean HRQoL scores, along with DR state specific and visual acuity specific utility values were analysed. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to ascertain concurrent validity between NEI-VFQ-25 composite score and its sub-scale scores, EQ-5D-5L index value, and EQ-VAS score. Lastly, we evaluated statistical models using predictor sets based on the EQ-5D-5 L utility scores to estimate NEI-VFQ-25 scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean EQ-5D-5 L utility value for DR patients was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.73). The mean NEI-VFQ-25 composite score and EQ-VAS score were 61.1 (95% CI: 57.5-64.5), and 67.6 (95% CI: 65.6-69.5), respectively. Both EQ-5D-5 L and EQ-VAS had a strong concurrent validity with NEI-VFQ-25 composite score. 'Tobit regression with log of composite score' was assessed to the preferred model to predict the NEI-VFQ-25 composite score using EQ-5D-5L utility values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy has a decremental impact on quality of life, which increases with severity in vision loss. Both generic as well as disease-specific outcome measures are equally reliable to determine quality of life of patients with DR. The EQ-5D-5 L can be utilized for measurement of HRQoL in DR in clinical settings to optimize time of clinicians, with further derivation of NEI-VFQ-25 values through application of the crosswalk algorithm for predicting vision- related QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the quality of life of patients with diabetic retinopathy in northern India: a comparison of generic and vision specific instruments.\",\"authors\":\"Neha Purohit, Aarti Goyal, Vishali Gupta, Parul Chawla Gupta, Prakash Singh, Shankar Prinja\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12955-025-02340-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients is important to assess the impact of disease, to monitor the treatment outcomes, and conduct health technology assessments. The study aimed to measure the HRQoL in DR patients using the generic as well as disease specific instruments, identify the determinants of HRQoL, empirically investigate the concurrent validity between the QoL instruments, and to develop statistical approaches to map NEI-VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute- Visual Function Questionnaire- 25) composite score based on EQ-5D-5 L (EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels) utility values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility based cross-sectional study was carried out to measure the HRQoL of 300 DR patients using EQ-5D-5 L, EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and NEI-VFQ-25 instruments. Mean HRQoL scores, along with DR state specific and visual acuity specific utility values were analysed. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to ascertain concurrent validity between NEI-VFQ-25 composite score and its sub-scale scores, EQ-5D-5L index value, and EQ-VAS score. Lastly, we evaluated statistical models using predictor sets based on the EQ-5D-5 L utility scores to estimate NEI-VFQ-25 scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean EQ-5D-5 L utility value for DR patients was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.73). The mean NEI-VFQ-25 composite score and EQ-VAS score were 61.1 (95% CI: 57.5-64.5), and 67.6 (95% CI: 65.6-69.5), respectively. Both EQ-5D-5 L and EQ-VAS had a strong concurrent validity with NEI-VFQ-25 composite score. 'Tobit regression with log of composite score' was assessed to the preferred model to predict the NEI-VFQ-25 composite score using EQ-5D-5L utility values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy has a decremental impact on quality of life, which increases with severity in vision loss. Both generic as well as disease-specific outcome measures are equally reliable to determine quality of life of patients with DR. The EQ-5D-5 L can be utilized for measurement of HRQoL in DR in clinical settings to optimize time of clinicians, with further derivation of NEI-VFQ-25 values through application of the crosswalk algorithm for predicting vision- related QoL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02340-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02340-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)对于评估疾病影响、监测治疗结果以及进行卫生技术评估具有重要意义。本研究旨在使用通用和疾病特异性仪器测量DR患者的HRQoL,确定HRQoL的决定因素,实证研究QoL仪器之间的并发效度,并建立基于eq - 5d - 5l (EuroQol 5维5水平)效用值的NEI-VFQ-25(美国国家眼科研究所-视觉功能问卷-25)综合评分的统计方法。方法:采用eq - 5d - 5l、EuroQol视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)和NEI-VFQ-25仪器对300例DR患者的HRQoL进行横断面研究。平均HRQoL评分,以及DR状态特异性和视力特异性效用值进行分析。采用Pearson相关系数确定NEI-VFQ-25综合评分与其子量表评分、EQ-5D-5L指数值、EQ-VAS评分的并发效度。最后,我们使用基于eq - 5d - 5l效用分数的预测集来评估统计模型,以估计NEI-VFQ-25分数。结果:DR患者的eq - 5d - 5l平均效用值为0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.73)。NEI-VFQ-25综合评分和EQ-VAS评分平均分别为61.1分(95% CI: 57.5-64.5)和67.6分(95% CI: 65.6-69.5)。eq - 5d - 5l和EQ-VAS与NEI-VFQ-25综合评分具有较强的并发效度。使用EQ-5D-5L效用值预测NEI-VFQ-25综合评分的首选模型被评估为“Tobit回归与log of composite score”。结论:糖尿病视网膜病变对生活质量的影响呈递减趋势,随视力丧失程度的加重而加重。在确定DR患者的生活质量方面,通用指标和疾病特异性指标同样可靠。eq - 5d - 5l可用于临床DR中HRQoL的测量,以优化临床医生的时间,通过应用人行横道算法预测视觉相关QoL,进一步推导NEI-VFQ-25值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the quality of life of patients with diabetic retinopathy in northern India: a comparison of generic and vision specific instruments.

Background: Estimation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients is important to assess the impact of disease, to monitor the treatment outcomes, and conduct health technology assessments. The study aimed to measure the HRQoL in DR patients using the generic as well as disease specific instruments, identify the determinants of HRQoL, empirically investigate the concurrent validity between the QoL instruments, and to develop statistical approaches to map NEI-VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute- Visual Function Questionnaire- 25) composite score based on EQ-5D-5 L (EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels) utility values.

Methods: A facility based cross-sectional study was carried out to measure the HRQoL of 300 DR patients using EQ-5D-5 L, EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and NEI-VFQ-25 instruments. Mean HRQoL scores, along with DR state specific and visual acuity specific utility values were analysed. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to ascertain concurrent validity between NEI-VFQ-25 composite score and its sub-scale scores, EQ-5D-5L index value, and EQ-VAS score. Lastly, we evaluated statistical models using predictor sets based on the EQ-5D-5 L utility scores to estimate NEI-VFQ-25 scores.

Results: The mean EQ-5D-5 L utility value for DR patients was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.73). The mean NEI-VFQ-25 composite score and EQ-VAS score were 61.1 (95% CI: 57.5-64.5), and 67.6 (95% CI: 65.6-69.5), respectively. Both EQ-5D-5 L and EQ-VAS had a strong concurrent validity with NEI-VFQ-25 composite score. 'Tobit regression with log of composite score' was assessed to the preferred model to predict the NEI-VFQ-25 composite score using EQ-5D-5L utility values.

Conclusion: Diabetic retinopathy has a decremental impact on quality of life, which increases with severity in vision loss. Both generic as well as disease-specific outcome measures are equally reliable to determine quality of life of patients with DR. The EQ-5D-5 L can be utilized for measurement of HRQoL in DR in clinical settings to optimize time of clinicians, with further derivation of NEI-VFQ-25 values through application of the crosswalk algorithm for predicting vision- related QoL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信