利用多序列磁共振成像区分三种鼻窦恶性肿瘤的深度学习模型。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Luxi Wang, Naier Lin, Wei Chen, Hanyu Xiao, Yiyin Zhang, Yan Sha
{"title":"利用多序列磁共振成像区分三种鼻窦恶性肿瘤的深度学习模型。","authors":"Luxi Wang, Naier Lin, Wei Chen, Hanyu Xiao, Yiyin Zhang, Yan Sha","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01517-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop MRI-based deep learning (DL) models for distinguishing sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and to evaluate whether the DL models could improve the diagnostic performance of Senior radiologist (SR) and Junior radiologist (JR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis consisted of 465 patients (229 sinonasal SCCs, 128 ACCs and 108 ONBs). The training and validation cohorts included 325 and 47 patients and the independent external testing cohort consisted of 93 patients. MRI images included T2-weighted image (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (CE-T1WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We analyzed the conventional MRI features to choose the independent predictors and built the conventional MRI model. Then we compared the macro- and micro- area under the curves (AUCs) of different sequences and different DL networks to formulate the best DL model [artificial intelligence (AI) model scheme]. With AI assistance, we observed the diagnostic performances between SR and JR. The diagnostic efficacies of SR and JR were assessed by accuracy, Recall, precision, F1-Score and confusion matrices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The independent predictors of conventional MRI included intensity on T2WI and intracranial invasion of sinonasal malignancies. With ExtraTrees (ET) classier, the conventional MRI model owned AUC of 78.8%. For DL models, ResNet101 network showed better performance than ResNet50 and DensNet121, especially for the mean fusion sequence (macro-AUC = 0.892, micro-AUC = 0.875, Accuracy = 0.810), and also good for the ADC sequence (macro-AUC = 0.872, micro-AUC = 0.874, Accuracy = 0.814). Grad-CAM showed that DL models focused on solid component of lesions. With the best AI scheme (ResNet101-mean sequence-based DL model) assistance, the diagnosis performances of SR (accuracy = 0.957, average Recall = 0.962, precision = 0.955, F1-Score = 0.957) and JR (accuracy = 0.925, average Recall = 0.917, precision = 0.931, F1-Score = 0.923) were significantly improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ResNet101 network with mean sequence based DL model could effectively differential between sinonasal SCC, ACC and ONB and improved the diagnostic performances of both senior and junior radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning models for differentiating three sinonasal malignancies using multi-sequence MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Luxi Wang, Naier Lin, Wei Chen, Hanyu Xiao, Yiyin Zhang, Yan Sha\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-024-01517-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop MRI-based deep learning (DL) models for distinguishing sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and to evaluate whether the DL models could improve the diagnostic performance of Senior radiologist (SR) and Junior radiologist (JR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis consisted of 465 patients (229 sinonasal SCCs, 128 ACCs and 108 ONBs). The training and validation cohorts included 325 and 47 patients and the independent external testing cohort consisted of 93 patients. MRI images included T2-weighted image (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (CE-T1WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We analyzed the conventional MRI features to choose the independent predictors and built the conventional MRI model. Then we compared the macro- and micro- area under the curves (AUCs) of different sequences and different DL networks to formulate the best DL model [artificial intelligence (AI) model scheme]. With AI assistance, we observed the diagnostic performances between SR and JR. The diagnostic efficacies of SR and JR were assessed by accuracy, Recall, precision, F1-Score and confusion matrices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The independent predictors of conventional MRI included intensity on T2WI and intracranial invasion of sinonasal malignancies. With ExtraTrees (ET) classier, the conventional MRI model owned AUC of 78.8%. For DL models, ResNet101 network showed better performance than ResNet50 and DensNet121, especially for the mean fusion sequence (macro-AUC = 0.892, micro-AUC = 0.875, Accuracy = 0.810), and also good for the ADC sequence (macro-AUC = 0.872, micro-AUC = 0.874, Accuracy = 0.814). Grad-CAM showed that DL models focused on solid component of lesions. With the best AI scheme (ResNet101-mean sequence-based DL model) assistance, the diagnosis performances of SR (accuracy = 0.957, average Recall = 0.962, precision = 0.955, F1-Score = 0.957) and JR (accuracy = 0.925, average Recall = 0.917, precision = 0.931, F1-Score = 0.923) were significantly improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ResNet101 network with mean sequence based DL model could effectively differential between sinonasal SCC, ACC and ONB and improved the diagnostic performances of both senior and junior radiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01517-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01517-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立基于mri的鼻窦鳞状细胞癌(SCC)、腺样囊性癌(ACC)和嗅觉神经母细胞瘤(ONB)的深度学习模型,并评估深度学习模型是否能提高高级放射科医生(SR)和初级放射科医生(JR)的诊断效能。方法:回顾性分析465例患者(229例鼻窦SCCs, 128例acc和108例onb)。培训和验证队列包括325名患者和47名患者,独立外部测试队列包括93名患者。MRI图像包括t2加权图像(T2WI)、对比增强t1加权图像(CE-T1WI)和表观扩散系数(ADC)。分析常规MRI特征,选择独立预测因子,建立常规MRI模型。然后,我们比较了不同序列和不同深度学习网络的宏观和微观曲线下面积(auc),以制定最佳深度学习模型[人工智能(AI)模型方案]。在人工智能的帮助下,我们观察了SR和JR的诊断效果。通过准确率、查全率、精密度、F1-Score和混淆矩阵来评估SR和JR的诊断效果。结果:常规MRI的独立预测因子包括T2WI强度和鼻窦恶性肿瘤的颅内侵犯。使用ExtraTrees (ET)分类器,常规MRI模型AUC为78.8%。对于深度学习模型,ResNet101网络表现出优于ResNet50和DensNet121的性能,特别是对于平均融合序列(macro-AUC = 0.892, micro-AUC = 0.875, Accuracy = 0.810),对于ADC序列(macro-AUC = 0.872, micro-AUC = 0.874, Accuracy = 0.814)也表现良好。Grad-CAM显示DL模型集中于病变的实体部分。在最佳AI方案(ResNet101-mean序列-based DL model)的辅助下,SR(准确率= 0.957,平均查全率= 0.962,精密度= 0.955,F1-Score = 0.957)和JR(准确率= 0.925,平均查全率= 0.917,精密度= 0.931,F1-Score = 0.923)的诊断性能均有显著提高。结论:基于平均序列DL模型的ResNet101网络能有效鉴别鼻窦SCC、ACC和ONB,提高了中低级放射科医师的诊断水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning models for differentiating three sinonasal malignancies using multi-sequence MRI.

Purpose: To develop MRI-based deep learning (DL) models for distinguishing sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and to evaluate whether the DL models could improve the diagnostic performance of Senior radiologist (SR) and Junior radiologist (JR).

Methods: This retrospective analysis consisted of 465 patients (229 sinonasal SCCs, 128 ACCs and 108 ONBs). The training and validation cohorts included 325 and 47 patients and the independent external testing cohort consisted of 93 patients. MRI images included T2-weighted image (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (CE-T1WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). We analyzed the conventional MRI features to choose the independent predictors and built the conventional MRI model. Then we compared the macro- and micro- area under the curves (AUCs) of different sequences and different DL networks to formulate the best DL model [artificial intelligence (AI) model scheme]. With AI assistance, we observed the diagnostic performances between SR and JR. The diagnostic efficacies of SR and JR were assessed by accuracy, Recall, precision, F1-Score and confusion matrices.

Results: The independent predictors of conventional MRI included intensity on T2WI and intracranial invasion of sinonasal malignancies. With ExtraTrees (ET) classier, the conventional MRI model owned AUC of 78.8%. For DL models, ResNet101 network showed better performance than ResNet50 and DensNet121, especially for the mean fusion sequence (macro-AUC = 0.892, micro-AUC = 0.875, Accuracy = 0.810), and also good for the ADC sequence (macro-AUC = 0.872, micro-AUC = 0.874, Accuracy = 0.814). Grad-CAM showed that DL models focused on solid component of lesions. With the best AI scheme (ResNet101-mean sequence-based DL model) assistance, the diagnosis performances of SR (accuracy = 0.957, average Recall = 0.962, precision = 0.955, F1-Score = 0.957) and JR (accuracy = 0.925, average Recall = 0.917, precision = 0.931, F1-Score = 0.923) were significantly improved.

Conclusion: The ResNet101 network with mean sequence based DL model could effectively differential between sinonasal SCC, ACC and ONB and improved the diagnostic performances of both senior and junior radiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信