不要看那里:评估对可能被忽视的位置的抑制。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Mei-Ching Lien, Eric Ruthruff, Dominick A. Tolomeo, Kristina-Maria Reitan
{"title":"不要看那里:评估对可能被忽视的位置的抑制。","authors":"Mei-Ching Lien,&nbsp;Eric Ruthruff,&nbsp;Dominick A. Tolomeo,&nbsp;Kristina-Maria Reitan","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03033-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Do people avoid visual distraction by suppressing locations expected to contain potent distractors? To address this issue, we combined a spatial cueing paradigm with a capture-probe paradigm. Each search display contained six shapes, two of which had the target shape. To know which target shape to respond to, participants had to use a spatial cue indicating the to-be-ignored locations for that trial. There were also two neutral locations that never contained distractors and so did not need to be suppressed, which served as a baseline. To assess spatial suppression below baseline, participants performed a probe letter recall task on 30% of trials. If people proactively suppress the threatening to-be-ignored locations below baseline, then probe recall for these cued-to-be-ignored distractor locations should be lower than that for the neutral locations (a probe suppression effect). However, we found no such probe suppression effect. It was absent both when the cued-to-be-ignored distractor locations changed randomly from trial-by-trial (Experiment 1) and when they were fixed (Experiments 2–4). It was absent even when the cued-to-be-ignored locations contained a salient color singleton to further incentivize suppression at those locations (Experiment 3) and when only a single distractor location was cued (Experiment 4). We propose that people accomplish selectivity either by blanketing suppression across all irrelevant locations (e.g., both threatening and non-threatening distractor locations), or by mainly boosting target locations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"87 3","pages":"815 - 831"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Don’t look there: Assessing the suppression of cued-to-be-ignored locations\",\"authors\":\"Mei-Ching Lien,&nbsp;Eric Ruthruff,&nbsp;Dominick A. Tolomeo,&nbsp;Kristina-Maria Reitan\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-025-03033-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Do people avoid visual distraction by suppressing locations expected to contain potent distractors? To address this issue, we combined a spatial cueing paradigm with a capture-probe paradigm. Each search display contained six shapes, two of which had the target shape. To know which target shape to respond to, participants had to use a spatial cue indicating the to-be-ignored locations for that trial. There were also two neutral locations that never contained distractors and so did not need to be suppressed, which served as a baseline. To assess spatial suppression below baseline, participants performed a probe letter recall task on 30% of trials. If people proactively suppress the threatening to-be-ignored locations below baseline, then probe recall for these cued-to-be-ignored distractor locations should be lower than that for the neutral locations (a probe suppression effect). However, we found no such probe suppression effect. It was absent both when the cued-to-be-ignored distractor locations changed randomly from trial-by-trial (Experiment 1) and when they were fixed (Experiments 2–4). It was absent even when the cued-to-be-ignored locations contained a salient color singleton to further incentivize suppression at those locations (Experiment 3) and when only a single distractor location was cued (Experiment 4). We propose that people accomplish selectivity either by blanketing suppression across all irrelevant locations (e.g., both threatening and non-threatening distractor locations), or by mainly boosting target locations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\"87 3\",\"pages\":\"815 - 831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-025-03033-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-025-03033-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们是否会通过抑制预期包含有效干扰物的位置来避免视觉干扰?为了解决这个问题,我们将空间线索范式与捕获-探测范式结合起来。每个搜索显示包含六个形状,其中两个有目标形状。为了知道要对哪个目标形状做出反应,参与者必须使用空间线索来指示该试验中要忽略的位置。还有两个中立的位置,不包含干扰物,因此不需要被抑制,这是一个基线。为了评估基线以下的空间抑制,参与者在30%的试验中执行了探针字母回忆任务。如果人们在基线以下主动抑制威胁被忽视的位置,那么对这些被忽视的线索分心物位置的探针回忆应该低于对中性位置的探针回忆(探针抑制效应)。然而,我们没有发现这种探针抑制作用。当提示被忽略的分心物的位置随机变化时(实验1)和当它们固定时(实验2-4),它都不存在。即使当被忽略的线索位置包含一个显著的颜色单例来进一步激励这些位置的抑制(实验3),或者当只有一个分心物位置被提示(实验4)时,它也不存在。我们建议人们通过覆盖所有不相关的位置(例如,威胁和非威胁分心物位置)来实现选择性,或者主要通过增强目标位置来实现选择性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Don’t look there: Assessing the suppression of cued-to-be-ignored locations

Do people avoid visual distraction by suppressing locations expected to contain potent distractors? To address this issue, we combined a spatial cueing paradigm with a capture-probe paradigm. Each search display contained six shapes, two of which had the target shape. To know which target shape to respond to, participants had to use a spatial cue indicating the to-be-ignored locations for that trial. There were also two neutral locations that never contained distractors and so did not need to be suppressed, which served as a baseline. To assess spatial suppression below baseline, participants performed a probe letter recall task on 30% of trials. If people proactively suppress the threatening to-be-ignored locations below baseline, then probe recall for these cued-to-be-ignored distractor locations should be lower than that for the neutral locations (a probe suppression effect). However, we found no such probe suppression effect. It was absent both when the cued-to-be-ignored distractor locations changed randomly from trial-by-trial (Experiment 1) and when they were fixed (Experiments 2–4). It was absent even when the cued-to-be-ignored locations contained a salient color singleton to further incentivize suppression at those locations (Experiment 3) and when only a single distractor location was cued (Experiment 4). We propose that people accomplish selectivity either by blanketing suppression across all irrelevant locations (e.g., both threatening and non-threatening distractor locations), or by mainly boosting target locations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信