评估正常患者自发性颅内低血压概率脑磁共振成像评分系统

Crystal H Kang, Ajay A Madhavan, John C Benson, Ian T Mark, Benjamin A Johnson-Tesch, Robert J McDonald, Jared T Verdoorn
{"title":"评估正常患者自发性颅内低血压概率脑磁共振成像评分系统","authors":"Crystal H Kang, Ajay A Madhavan, John C Benson, Ian T Mark, Benjamin A Johnson-Tesch, Robert J McDonald, Jared T Verdoorn","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Probabilistic brain MRI scoring systems have been introduced to stratify the likelihood of identifying a CSF leak at myelography in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). The Bern scoring system by Dobrocky et al. is now well recognized, with a scoring system by Benson et al. introduced more recently (referred to as the \"Mayo\" score in this study). Neither of these scoring systems have been thoroughly evaluated in patients without SIH. The goal of this study was to evaluate these scoring systems in patients without SIH to understand the specificity of these MRI findings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed normal brain MRIs performed in patients without clinically suspected SIH. Each examination was reviewed by one of four board-certified neuroradiologists with extensive experience in SIH, and all criteria of both scoring systems were evaluated and recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients were included. Bern score was low probability in 78% and intermediate probability in 22%. Mayo score was low probability in 100%. Relatively high rates of positivity were seen in three specific Bern score parameters, including prepontine cistern effacement 5.0 mm or less (53%), decreased mammilopontine distance 6.5 mm or less (40%), and suprasellar cistern effacement 4.0 mm or less (28%). All intermediate probability Bern scores were due to suprasellar cistern effacement plus either or both prepontine cistern effacement and decreased mammilopontine distance. All other parameters of both scoring systems were either never or very rarely positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All intermediate probability Bern scores were due to decreased CSF cistern measurements, which had relatively high positivity rates in our non-SIH patient cohort. Due to substantial overlap with normals, these measurements are not specific indicators of \"brain sag\", a hallmark imaging finding for SIH, and are not specific for SIH when the only \"positive\" brain MRI finding(s). The Mayo score is likely more specific for SIH with low probability scores in all patients in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>SIH, spontaneous intracranial hypotension; DSM, digital subtraction myelography; CTM, CT myelography; PC-CTM, photon counting CT myelography; CVF, CSF-venous fistula; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Probabilistic Brain MRI Scoring Systems in Normal Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Crystal H Kang, Ajay A Madhavan, John C Benson, Ian T Mark, Benjamin A Johnson-Tesch, Robert J McDonald, Jared T Verdoorn\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Probabilistic brain MRI scoring systems have been introduced to stratify the likelihood of identifying a CSF leak at myelography in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). The Bern scoring system by Dobrocky et al. is now well recognized, with a scoring system by Benson et al. introduced more recently (referred to as the \\\"Mayo\\\" score in this study). Neither of these scoring systems have been thoroughly evaluated in patients without SIH. The goal of this study was to evaluate these scoring systems in patients without SIH to understand the specificity of these MRI findings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed normal brain MRIs performed in patients without clinically suspected SIH. Each examination was reviewed by one of four board-certified neuroradiologists with extensive experience in SIH, and all criteria of both scoring systems were evaluated and recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 patients were included. Bern score was low probability in 78% and intermediate probability in 22%. Mayo score was low probability in 100%. Relatively high rates of positivity were seen in three specific Bern score parameters, including prepontine cistern effacement 5.0 mm or less (53%), decreased mammilopontine distance 6.5 mm or less (40%), and suprasellar cistern effacement 4.0 mm or less (28%). All intermediate probability Bern scores were due to suprasellar cistern effacement plus either or both prepontine cistern effacement and decreased mammilopontine distance. All other parameters of both scoring systems were either never or very rarely positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All intermediate probability Bern scores were due to decreased CSF cistern measurements, which had relatively high positivity rates in our non-SIH patient cohort. Due to substantial overlap with normals, these measurements are not specific indicators of \\\"brain sag\\\", a hallmark imaging finding for SIH, and are not specific for SIH when the only \\\"positive\\\" brain MRI finding(s). The Mayo score is likely more specific for SIH with low probability scores in all patients in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>SIH, spontaneous intracranial hypotension; DSM, digital subtraction myelography; CTM, CT myelography; PC-CTM, photon counting CT myelography; CVF, CSF-venous fistula; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:人们引入了概率脑磁共振成像评分系统,对自发性颅内低血压(SIH)患者髓核造影时发现脑脊液漏的可能性进行分层。目前,Dobrocky 等人的 Bern 评分系统已得到广泛认可,Benson 等人的评分系统也于近期推出(本研究中称为 "Mayo "评分)。这两种评分系统均未在无 SIH 的患者中进行过全面评估。本研究的目的是在非 SIH 患者中评估这些评分系统,以了解这些 MRI 发现的特异性:我们回顾性地检查了无临床疑似 SIH 患者的正常脑部 MRI。每项检查均由四位在 SIH 方面具有丰富经验的神经放射医师中的一位进行审查,并对两种评分系统的所有标准进行评估和记录:结果:共纳入 90 名患者。78%的伯尔尼评分为低概率,22%为中概率。梅奥评分为低概率的占 100%。在伯恩评分的三个特定参数中,阳性率相对较高,包括脑桥前蝶窦膨出 5.0 毫米或以下(53%)、乳突间距减小 6.5 毫米或以下(40%)和星状上蝶窦膨出 4.0 毫米或以下(28%)。所有伯恩评分的中间概率都是由于星上蝶窦脱出加上桥脑前蝶窦脱出和乳突间距缩小。两种评分系统的所有其他参数要么从未呈阳性,要么极少呈阳性:结论:所有伯尔尼中位概率评分都是由于脑脊液贮水池测量值减少所致,而在我们的非 SIH 患者队列中,脑脊液贮水池测量值的阳性率相对较高。由于与正常人的测量结果有很大的重叠,这些测量结果并不是 "脑下垂 "的特异性指标,而 "脑下垂 "是 SIH 的标志性影像学发现。梅奥评分可能对我们队列中所有低概率评分的 SIH 患者更具特异性:缩写:SIH,自发性颅内低血压;DSM,数字减影髓鞘造影;CTM,CT髓鞘造影;PC-CTM,光子计数CT髓鞘造影;CVF,CSF-静脉瘘;ICC,类内相关系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Probabilistic Brain MRI Scoring Systems in Normal Patients.

Background and purpose: Probabilistic brain MRI scoring systems have been introduced to stratify the likelihood of identifying a CSF leak at myelography in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). The Bern scoring system by Dobrocky et al. is now well recognized, with a scoring system by Benson et al. introduced more recently (referred to as the "Mayo" score in this study). Neither of these scoring systems have been thoroughly evaluated in patients without SIH. The goal of this study was to evaluate these scoring systems in patients without SIH to understand the specificity of these MRI findings.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed normal brain MRIs performed in patients without clinically suspected SIH. Each examination was reviewed by one of four board-certified neuroradiologists with extensive experience in SIH, and all criteria of both scoring systems were evaluated and recorded.

Results: 90 patients were included. Bern score was low probability in 78% and intermediate probability in 22%. Mayo score was low probability in 100%. Relatively high rates of positivity were seen in three specific Bern score parameters, including prepontine cistern effacement 5.0 mm or less (53%), decreased mammilopontine distance 6.5 mm or less (40%), and suprasellar cistern effacement 4.0 mm or less (28%). All intermediate probability Bern scores were due to suprasellar cistern effacement plus either or both prepontine cistern effacement and decreased mammilopontine distance. All other parameters of both scoring systems were either never or very rarely positive.

Conclusions: All intermediate probability Bern scores were due to decreased CSF cistern measurements, which had relatively high positivity rates in our non-SIH patient cohort. Due to substantial overlap with normals, these measurements are not specific indicators of "brain sag", a hallmark imaging finding for SIH, and are not specific for SIH when the only "positive" brain MRI finding(s). The Mayo score is likely more specific for SIH with low probability scores in all patients in our cohort.

Abbreviations: SIH, spontaneous intracranial hypotension; DSM, digital subtraction myelography; CTM, CT myelography; PC-CTM, photon counting CT myelography; CVF, CSF-venous fistula; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信