Gillian Debra, Jolien Braet, Nathalie Michels, Elisabeth Schreuders, Matteo Giletta
{"title":"Within-person associations between emotion regulation and negative affect in adolescents' daily life.","authors":"Gillian Debra, Jolien Braet, Nathalie Michels, Elisabeth Schreuders, Matteo Giletta","doi":"10.1037/emo0001505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Adolescence</i> is marked by elevated levels of negative affect (NA) and is a crucial period for the development of emotion regulation (ER). To date, relatively little is known about how adolescents' daily use of different ER strategies (ERS) is associated with momentary affective experiences. To elucidate these dynamics, we investigated whether (a) within-person differences in using different ERS were related to momentary NA and positive affect, (b) ER variability (operationalized as between-strategy variability) was related to momentary affect, and (c) stressor intensity was a moderator herein. Data from two ecological momentary assessment studies were used: <i>N</i><sub>Study1</sub> = 89 Dutch adolescents (48% females, data collected in 2019) and <i>N</i><sub>Study2</sub> = 266 Belgian adolescents (42% females, data collected in 2021). Momentary affect and ERS use were measured eight times per day during 1 week (Study 1) or five times during 2 weeks (Study 2). Within-person associations were estimated using a series of univariate autoregressive (Lag-1) dynamic structural equation models. Results show that, of all the ERS examined, only distraction was associated with lower levels of momentary NA and higher levels of positive affect across both studies, whereas the opposite associations were found for rumination. Contrary to expectations, ER variability was associated with lower levels of momentary NA only when stressor intensity was low but with higher levels of NA when stressor intensity was high. Overall, findings have noteworthy implications for future research on affect dynamics in adolescents and reveal a more nuanced picture about the benefits of ER variability in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
青春期的特点是负性情绪(NA)水平升高,是情绪调节(ER)发展的关键时期。迄今为止,人们对青少年日常使用不同情绪调节策略(ERS)与瞬间情绪体验之间的关系知之甚少。为了阐明这些动态变化,我们研究了:(a) 使用不同ERS的人内差异是否与瞬间NA和积极情绪有关;(b) ER的可变性(可操作化为策略间可变性)是否与瞬间情绪有关;(c) 压力源强度是否是调节因素。本研究使用了两项生态瞬间评估研究的数据:NStudy1 = 89 名荷兰青少年(48% 为女性,数据收集于 2019 年),NStudy2 = 266 名比利时青少年(42% 为女性,数据收集于 2021 年)。在一周内每天测量八次(研究 1)或在两周内测量五次(研究 2)瞬时情绪和 ERS 使用情况。使用一系列单变量自回归(Lag-1)动态结构方程模型估算了人与人之间的关联。结果表明,在两项研究中,在所有被研究的ERS中,只有分心与较低的瞬间NA水平和较高的积极情绪水平相关,而反刍则与之相反。与预期相反,只有当压力强度较低时,ER 变异才与较低的瞬间 NA 水平相关,而当压力强度较高时,ER 变异则与较高的 NA 水平相关。总之,研究结果对青少年情感动态的未来研究具有值得注意的意义,并揭示了日常生活中ER变异性的益处。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Within-person associations between emotion regulation and negative affect in adolescents' daily life.
Adolescence is marked by elevated levels of negative affect (NA) and is a crucial period for the development of emotion regulation (ER). To date, relatively little is known about how adolescents' daily use of different ER strategies (ERS) is associated with momentary affective experiences. To elucidate these dynamics, we investigated whether (a) within-person differences in using different ERS were related to momentary NA and positive affect, (b) ER variability (operationalized as between-strategy variability) was related to momentary affect, and (c) stressor intensity was a moderator herein. Data from two ecological momentary assessment studies were used: NStudy1 = 89 Dutch adolescents (48% females, data collected in 2019) and NStudy2 = 266 Belgian adolescents (42% females, data collected in 2021). Momentary affect and ERS use were measured eight times per day during 1 week (Study 1) or five times during 2 weeks (Study 2). Within-person associations were estimated using a series of univariate autoregressive (Lag-1) dynamic structural equation models. Results show that, of all the ERS examined, only distraction was associated with lower levels of momentary NA and higher levels of positive affect across both studies, whereas the opposite associations were found for rumination. Contrary to expectations, ER variability was associated with lower levels of momentary NA only when stressor intensity was low but with higher levels of NA when stressor intensity was high. Overall, findings have noteworthy implications for future research on affect dynamics in adolescents and reveal a more nuanced picture about the benefits of ER variability in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.