孕妇产前类固醇处方实践评价。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Antalya Jano, Caroline Madigan, Paris Ekeke
{"title":"孕妇产前类固醇处方实践评价。","authors":"Antalya Jano, Caroline Madigan, Paris Ekeke","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04070-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The significant racial disparity in adverse birth outcomes is unexplained by individual-level stressors. This implores us to explore modifiable prenatal care delivery characteristics. Our objective was to evaluate if racial disparities in infant respiratory outcomes were explained by inequitable exposure to antenatal steroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included women who delivered infants between 23 and 34 weeks gestation in Level 3 NICU between January 2017 and December 2020. Prenatal and postnatal variables, including exposure to antenatal steroids, were collected. A community need index was assigned designating level of neighborhood deprivation. Chi squared and t tests were performed to look for racial differences in prenatal and delivery characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no racial differences in steroid administration with 89.9% of eligible Black women and 89.8% of eligible White women completing an antenatal steroid course. Despite no differences in maternal risk factors such as diabetes, pre-eclampsia, prenatal care utilization and PPROM, Black infants were more likely to require intubation (p = 0.04), oxygen (p = 0.001), and surfactant (p = 0.008) in the delivery room compared to White infants. Compared to the lower community need groups exposed to ANS, the high need group had higher rates of chorioamnionitis and were more likely to be on Medicaid and Black race. Despite this, there were no differences in infant respiratory outcomes by community need group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the shift in focus to include the interaction between individuals and their community exposures, the racial disparity in birth outcomes persists. Attention should be paid to other modifiable elements of a mother's prenatal experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Prescription Practices for Antenatal Steroids in Pregnant Women.\",\"authors\":\"Antalya Jano, Caroline Madigan, Paris Ekeke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-025-04070-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The significant racial disparity in adverse birth outcomes is unexplained by individual-level stressors. This implores us to explore modifiable prenatal care delivery characteristics. Our objective was to evaluate if racial disparities in infant respiratory outcomes were explained by inequitable exposure to antenatal steroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included women who delivered infants between 23 and 34 weeks gestation in Level 3 NICU between January 2017 and December 2020. Prenatal and postnatal variables, including exposure to antenatal steroids, were collected. A community need index was assigned designating level of neighborhood deprivation. Chi squared and t tests were performed to look for racial differences in prenatal and delivery characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no racial differences in steroid administration with 89.9% of eligible Black women and 89.8% of eligible White women completing an antenatal steroid course. Despite no differences in maternal risk factors such as diabetes, pre-eclampsia, prenatal care utilization and PPROM, Black infants were more likely to require intubation (p = 0.04), oxygen (p = 0.001), and surfactant (p = 0.008) in the delivery room compared to White infants. Compared to the lower community need groups exposed to ANS, the high need group had higher rates of chorioamnionitis and were more likely to be on Medicaid and Black race. Despite this, there were no differences in infant respiratory outcomes by community need group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the shift in focus to include the interaction between individuals and their community exposures, the racial disparity in birth outcomes persists. Attention should be paid to other modifiable elements of a mother's prenatal experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04070-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04070-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不良出生结局的显著种族差异可以用个体水平的应激源来解释。这促使我们探索可修改的产前护理交付特点。我们的目的是评估婴儿呼吸结果的种族差异是否可以用产前类固醇的不公平暴露来解释。方法:我们纳入了2017年1月至2020年12月期间在3级NICU分娩23至34周婴儿的妇女。收集产前和产后变量,包括产前类固醇暴露。分配了一个社区需求指数来指定邻里剥夺的程度。进行卡方检验和t检验以寻找产前和分娩特征的种族差异。结果:类固醇给药方面没有种族差异,89.9%的符合条件的黑人妇女和89.8%的符合条件的白人妇女完成了产前类固醇疗程。尽管母亲的危险因素如糖尿病、先兆子痫、产前护理利用和PPROM没有差异,但与白人婴儿相比,黑人婴儿在产房中更可能需要插管(p = 0.04)、氧气(p = 0.001)和表面活性剂(p = 0.008)。与接触ANS的低社区需求群体相比,高需求群体有更高的绒毛膜羊膜炎发病率,更有可能接受医疗补助和黑人。尽管如此,不同社区需要组的婴儿呼吸结果没有差异。结论:尽管将重点转移到包括个人与其社区暴露之间的相互作用,但出生结果的种族差异仍然存在。应注意母亲产前经历中其他可改变的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Prescription Practices for Antenatal Steroids in Pregnant Women.

Objective: The significant racial disparity in adverse birth outcomes is unexplained by individual-level stressors. This implores us to explore modifiable prenatal care delivery characteristics. Our objective was to evaluate if racial disparities in infant respiratory outcomes were explained by inequitable exposure to antenatal steroids.

Methods: We included women who delivered infants between 23 and 34 weeks gestation in Level 3 NICU between January 2017 and December 2020. Prenatal and postnatal variables, including exposure to antenatal steroids, were collected. A community need index was assigned designating level of neighborhood deprivation. Chi squared and t tests were performed to look for racial differences in prenatal and delivery characteristics.

Results: There were no racial differences in steroid administration with 89.9% of eligible Black women and 89.8% of eligible White women completing an antenatal steroid course. Despite no differences in maternal risk factors such as diabetes, pre-eclampsia, prenatal care utilization and PPROM, Black infants were more likely to require intubation (p = 0.04), oxygen (p = 0.001), and surfactant (p = 0.008) in the delivery room compared to White infants. Compared to the lower community need groups exposed to ANS, the high need group had higher rates of chorioamnionitis and were more likely to be on Medicaid and Black race. Despite this, there were no differences in infant respiratory outcomes by community need group.

Conclusions: Despite the shift in focus to include the interaction between individuals and their community exposures, the racial disparity in birth outcomes persists. Attention should be paid to other modifiable elements of a mother's prenatal experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信