Jonathan Liu, Mohammad Daher, Jacob Laperche, Drew Clippert, Zainab Ibrahim, Thomas J Barrett, Valentin Antoci
{"title":"使用超同心层聚乙烯衬垫进行全膝关节置换术的患者报告结果:随机研究","authors":"Jonathan Liu, Mohammad Daher, Jacob Laperche, Drew Clippert, Zainab Ibrahim, Thomas J Barrett, Valentin Antoci","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.80407.3674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the Depuy curved (CVD) polyethylene insert to the curved plus (CVD+) design in TKA, which has an increased dished curve for increased articulation congruence and thus secondary anterior to posterior stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial with 100 patients was conducted to compare two knee replacement designs (CVD and CVD+ polyethylene inserts) using the Johnson and Johnson DePuy PFC Sigma total knee replacement. All participants, were randomized and blinded to reduce bias. The trial achieved 100% recruitment and maintained blinding throughout the study. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and KOOS scores were recorded pre-operatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. In addition, physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) were collected at 12 months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients had preoperative data, split equally into CVD and CVD+ groups. The cohort's average age was 71.47 years, and 72% were female, with no statistically significant demographic differences between groups. Preoperative measures showed no differences in Pain, ADL, or QOL. At 3 months, no significant differences were noted, though the QOL difference was 64.45 ± 16.57 for CVD and 52.94 ± 27.1 for CVD+ (p = 0.15). At 12 months, trends favored the CVD group, but differences in Pain, ADL, QOL, PCS, and MCS were not significant. Complications were similar, except for stiffness, with 0 cases in the CVD group and 3 in the CVD+ group at 3 months; both had 2 additional cases at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, there was no difference between designs in terms of pain, activities of daily living, and standard outcomes. Further studies are required to support the benefit of increased congruence in the CVD+ design, even though widespread adoption has been common across the industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 2","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Reported Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Ultra-congruent Lipped Polyethylene Liners: A Randomized Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Liu, Mohammad Daher, Jacob Laperche, Drew Clippert, Zainab Ibrahim, Thomas J Barrett, Valentin Antoci\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/ABJS.2024.80407.3674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare the Depuy curved (CVD) polyethylene insert to the curved plus (CVD+) design in TKA, which has an increased dished curve for increased articulation congruence and thus secondary anterior to posterior stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial with 100 patients was conducted to compare two knee replacement designs (CVD and CVD+ polyethylene inserts) using the Johnson and Johnson DePuy PFC Sigma total knee replacement. All participants, were randomized and blinded to reduce bias. The trial achieved 100% recruitment and maintained blinding throughout the study. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and KOOS scores were recorded pre-operatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. In addition, physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) were collected at 12 months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients had preoperative data, split equally into CVD and CVD+ groups. The cohort's average age was 71.47 years, and 72% were female, with no statistically significant demographic differences between groups. Preoperative measures showed no differences in Pain, ADL, or QOL. At 3 months, no significant differences were noted, though the QOL difference was 64.45 ± 16.57 for CVD and 52.94 ± 27.1 for CVD+ (p = 0.15). At 12 months, trends favored the CVD group, but differences in Pain, ADL, QOL, PCS, and MCS were not significant. Complications were similar, except for stiffness, with 0 cases in the CVD group and 3 in the CVD+ group at 3 months; both had 2 additional cases at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, there was no difference between designs in terms of pain, activities of daily living, and standard outcomes. Further studies are required to support the benefit of increased congruence in the CVD+ design, even though widespread adoption has been common across the industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"100-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.80407.3674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.80407.3674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Reported Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Ultra-congruent Lipped Polyethylene Liners: A Randomized Study.
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the Depuy curved (CVD) polyethylene insert to the curved plus (CVD+) design in TKA, which has an increased dished curve for increased articulation congruence and thus secondary anterior to posterior stability.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial with 100 patients was conducted to compare two knee replacement designs (CVD and CVD+ polyethylene inserts) using the Johnson and Johnson DePuy PFC Sigma total knee replacement. All participants, were randomized and blinded to reduce bias. The trial achieved 100% recruitment and maintained blinding throughout the study. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and KOOS scores were recorded pre-operatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. In addition, physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) were collected at 12 months post-operatively.
Results: Sixty patients had preoperative data, split equally into CVD and CVD+ groups. The cohort's average age was 71.47 years, and 72% were female, with no statistically significant demographic differences between groups. Preoperative measures showed no differences in Pain, ADL, or QOL. At 3 months, no significant differences were noted, though the QOL difference was 64.45 ± 16.57 for CVD and 52.94 ± 27.1 for CVD+ (p = 0.15). At 12 months, trends favored the CVD group, but differences in Pain, ADL, QOL, PCS, and MCS were not significant. Complications were similar, except for stiffness, with 0 cases in the CVD group and 3 in the CVD+ group at 3 months; both had 2 additional cases at 12 months.
Conclusion: In our study, there was no difference between designs in terms of pain, activities of daily living, and standard outcomes. Further studies are required to support the benefit of increased congruence in the CVD+ design, even though widespread adoption has been common across the industry.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).