医疗保健专业人员与患有限制生命的严重神经损伤儿童的父母讨论损失和悲伤:来自范围审查的发现。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Elaine Brennan, Marian Mya Clarke, Suzanne Guerin
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员与患有限制生命的严重神经损伤儿童的父母讨论损失和悲伤:来自范围审查的发现。","authors":"Elaine Brennan, Marian Mya Clarke, Suzanne Guerin","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Parents' experiences of loss and grief in the context of caring for a child with life-limiting severe neurological conditions are complex. Supportive interventions delivered by multidisciplinary teams have the potential to mitigate illness-related and anticipatory grief before and after bereavement. To date, the literature on professionals' discussion of loss and grief with parents has not been synthesized. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence to establish what is known about professionals' experience of these discussions with this population, with particular emphasis on timing, frequency, and the setting in which discussions occur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was developed, informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta analyses - Scoping Extension guidelines and the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. Three electronic databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMED) were searched using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and keywords search strings in January 2023. The search was not limited to year of publication. Overall, 35 articles were analyzed using a combination of descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two overarching themes were identified, \"loss and grief are part of this context\" and \"lack of recognition of loss and grief,\" illustrating that despite the lack of evidence of explicit discussion of these issues, some aspects of loss and grief appeared to guide or implicitly influence healthcare professionals' practice. Failure to acknowledge loss and grief was associated with an increase in parental distress and had implications for future care planning.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Healthcare professionals are well placed to discuss loss and grief with parents of children with life-limiting severe neurological conditions. However, these discussions are only implicitly reported in the literature. Findings suggest that some professionals avoided discussing loss and grief. Bereavement outcomes are not typically considered in findings of the papers reviewed. Based on these findings, future research should focus on what this means for understanding professionals' capacity to engage with loss and grief.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals' discussion of loss and grief with parents of children with life-limiting severe neurological impairment: Findings from a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Brennan, Marian Mya Clarke, Suzanne Guerin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951524001743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Parents' experiences of loss and grief in the context of caring for a child with life-limiting severe neurological conditions are complex. Supportive interventions delivered by multidisciplinary teams have the potential to mitigate illness-related and anticipatory grief before and after bereavement. To date, the literature on professionals' discussion of loss and grief with parents has not been synthesized. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence to establish what is known about professionals' experience of these discussions with this population, with particular emphasis on timing, frequency, and the setting in which discussions occur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was developed, informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta analyses - Scoping Extension guidelines and the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. Three electronic databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMED) were searched using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and keywords search strings in January 2023. The search was not limited to year of publication. Overall, 35 articles were analyzed using a combination of descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two overarching themes were identified, \\\"loss and grief are part of this context\\\" and \\\"lack of recognition of loss and grief,\\\" illustrating that despite the lack of evidence of explicit discussion of these issues, some aspects of loss and grief appeared to guide or implicitly influence healthcare professionals' practice. Failure to acknowledge loss and grief was associated with an increase in parental distress and had implications for future care planning.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Healthcare professionals are well placed to discuss loss and grief with parents of children with life-limiting severe neurological conditions. However, these discussions are only implicitly reported in the literature. Findings suggest that some professionals avoided discussing loss and grief. Bereavement outcomes are not typically considered in findings of the papers reviewed. Based on these findings, future research should focus on what this means for understanding professionals' capacity to engage with loss and grief.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001743\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:父母在照顾一个患有限制生命的严重神经系统疾病的孩子时的失去和悲伤的经历是复杂的。多学科团队提供的支持性干预措施有可能减轻丧亲前后与疾病相关的和预期的悲伤。到目前为止,关于专业人士与父母讨论失去和悲伤的文献还没有被综合。本系统综述旨在综合证据,以确定专业人员与该人群进行这些讨论的已知经验,特别强调讨论发生的时间、频率和环境。方法:根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目-范围扩展指南和PCC(人口,概念,背景)框架,制定了范围审查。在2023年1月使用医学主题标题(MeSH)术语和关键词搜索字符串对PsycINFO、CINAHL和PubMED三个电子数据库进行检索。搜索不限于出版年份。总体而言,使用描述性分析和主题综合相结合的方法分析了35篇文章。结果:确定了两个总体主题,“损失和悲伤是这一背景的一部分”和“缺乏对损失和悲伤的认识”,说明尽管缺乏对这些问题的明确讨论的证据,但损失和悲伤的某些方面似乎指导或暗中影响医疗保健专业人员的实践。不能承认失去和悲伤与父母痛苦的增加有关,并对未来的护理计划有影响。结果的意义:医疗保健专业人员很好地与患有限制生命的严重神经系统疾病的儿童的父母讨论损失和悲伤。然而,这些讨论在文献中只是含蓄地报道。研究结果表明,一些专业人士避免讨论失去和悲伤。在审查的论文的研究结果中通常不考虑丧亲结果。基于这些发现,未来的研究应该关注这对理解专业人士处理损失和悲伤的能力意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare professionals' discussion of loss and grief with parents of children with life-limiting severe neurological impairment: Findings from a scoping review.

Objectives: Parents' experiences of loss and grief in the context of caring for a child with life-limiting severe neurological conditions are complex. Supportive interventions delivered by multidisciplinary teams have the potential to mitigate illness-related and anticipatory grief before and after bereavement. To date, the literature on professionals' discussion of loss and grief with parents has not been synthesized. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence to establish what is known about professionals' experience of these discussions with this population, with particular emphasis on timing, frequency, and the setting in which discussions occur.

Methods: A scoping review was developed, informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta analyses - Scoping Extension guidelines and the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework. Three electronic databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMED) were searched using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and keywords search strings in January 2023. The search was not limited to year of publication. Overall, 35 articles were analyzed using a combination of descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis.

Results: Two overarching themes were identified, "loss and grief are part of this context" and "lack of recognition of loss and grief," illustrating that despite the lack of evidence of explicit discussion of these issues, some aspects of loss and grief appeared to guide or implicitly influence healthcare professionals' practice. Failure to acknowledge loss and grief was associated with an increase in parental distress and had implications for future care planning.

Significance of results: Healthcare professionals are well placed to discuss loss and grief with parents of children with life-limiting severe neurological conditions. However, these discussions are only implicitly reported in the literature. Findings suggest that some professionals avoided discussing loss and grief. Bereavement outcomes are not typically considered in findings of the papers reviewed. Based on these findings, future research should focus on what this means for understanding professionals' capacity to engage with loss and grief.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信