鼻整形术后嗅觉功能障碍原因的初步研究

Q4 Medicine
J Liu, X J Zhan, L Y Yao, X Gao, C H Hu, W Hu, J F Liu
{"title":"鼻整形术后嗅觉功能障碍原因的初步研究","authors":"J Liu, X J Zhan, L Y Yao, X Gao, C H Hu, W Hu, J F Liu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240324-00168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to evaluate the nasal structural and electrophysiological features of patients with postoperative olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 30 outpatients (females, aged 33±6 years) from Beijing Anzhen Hospital and China-Japan Friendship Hospital between 2014 and 2023, who complained of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. The control group was 30 healthy females aged 32±9 years. Psychophysical olfactory test (Sniffin' Sticks, SS), olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials (oERPs and tERPs), and acoustic rhinometry were used for evaluating the olfactory function and nasal structure in patients and healthy controls. SPSS 17.0 software was used to compare the difference in olfactory function and nasal structure between the two groups and to analyze the factors related postoperative olfactory dysfunction. <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in the scores on psychophysical olfactory test between the patients and controls (10.78±3.90 <i>vs</i>. 33.66±2.42, <i>t</i>=-23.35, <i>P</i><0.001). ERPs could be evoked in all patients and controls. Patients showed higher amplitudes of N<sub>1</sub> waves in both oERPs and tERPs than controls (<i>P</i><0.05 for all), but no differences in the latencies of N<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>2</sub> waves or in the amplitudes of P<sub>2</sub> waves were observed between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05 for all). There was no difference in nasal structure between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). However, after nasal decongestant, mucosal congestion in the cross-sectional area (CSA) from the nostril to 6 cm level was found more significantly in patients than controls (nasal congestion index 40.00% <i>vs</i>. 1.00%, <i>t</i>=2.09, <i>P</i>=0.047). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing nasal volumes, increasing nasal threshold and anterior nasal turbinate plane CSA(<i>P<</i>0.05 for all). <b>Conclusion:</b> The important factor related to olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty may be attributed to local mucosal congestion, rather than nasal structural alteration or neurophysiologic deficits in the olfactory pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"127-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A preliminary study on the causes of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty].\",\"authors\":\"J Liu, X J Zhan, L Y Yao, X Gao, C H Hu, W Hu, J F Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240324-00168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to evaluate the nasal structural and electrophysiological features of patients with postoperative olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 30 outpatients (females, aged 33±6 years) from Beijing Anzhen Hospital and China-Japan Friendship Hospital between 2014 and 2023, who complained of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. The control group was 30 healthy females aged 32±9 years. Psychophysical olfactory test (Sniffin' Sticks, SS), olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials (oERPs and tERPs), and acoustic rhinometry were used for evaluating the olfactory function and nasal structure in patients and healthy controls. SPSS 17.0 software was used to compare the difference in olfactory function and nasal structure between the two groups and to analyze the factors related postoperative olfactory dysfunction. <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in the scores on psychophysical olfactory test between the patients and controls (10.78±3.90 <i>vs</i>. 33.66±2.42, <i>t</i>=-23.35, <i>P</i><0.001). ERPs could be evoked in all patients and controls. Patients showed higher amplitudes of N<sub>1</sub> waves in both oERPs and tERPs than controls (<i>P</i><0.05 for all), but no differences in the latencies of N<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>2</sub> waves or in the amplitudes of P<sub>2</sub> waves were observed between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05 for all). There was no difference in nasal structure between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). However, after nasal decongestant, mucosal congestion in the cross-sectional area (CSA) from the nostril to 6 cm level was found more significantly in patients than controls (nasal congestion index 40.00% <i>vs</i>. 1.00%, <i>t</i>=2.09, <i>P</i>=0.047). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing nasal volumes, increasing nasal threshold and anterior nasal turbinate plane CSA(<i>P<</i>0.05 for all). <b>Conclusion:</b> The important factor related to olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty may be attributed to local mucosal congestion, rather than nasal structural alteration or neurophysiologic deficits in the olfactory pathway.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"127-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240324-00168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240324-00168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨鼻整形术后嗅觉功能障碍患者的鼻结构和鼻电生理特征。方法:回顾性分析2014 - 2023年北京安贞医院和中日友好医院收治的30例美容鼻整形术后嗅觉功能障碍患者的临床特征(女性,33±6岁)。对照组为健康女性30名,年龄32±9岁。采用心理物理嗅觉测试(Sniffin' Sticks, SS)、嗅觉和三叉事件相关电位(oERPs和tERPs)以及声学鼻测量法评估患者和健康对照组的嗅觉功能和鼻腔结构。采用SPSS 17.0统计软件比较两组患者嗅觉功能和鼻腔结构的差异,分析术后嗅觉功能障碍的相关因素。结果:两组患者的心理物理嗅觉测试得分(10.78±3.90 vs. 33.66±2.42,t=-23.35)差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者在oERPs和tERPs中的P1波均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组鼻结构差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。然而,鼻塞减充血后,患者鼻塞指数40.00%比1.00%,鼻塞指数t=2.09, P=0.047,鼻腔至6 cm水平的黏膜充血明显高于对照组。嗅觉功能改善与鼻容积增大、鼻阈值增大、鼻前鼻甲平面CSA升高相关(均P0.05)。结论:鼻整形术后嗅觉功能障碍的重要因素可能是局部粘膜充血,而不是鼻腔结构改变或嗅觉通路的神经生理缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[A preliminary study on the causes of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty].

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the nasal structural and electrophysiological features of patients with postoperative olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 30 outpatients (females, aged 33±6 years) from Beijing Anzhen Hospital and China-Japan Friendship Hospital between 2014 and 2023, who complained of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. The control group was 30 healthy females aged 32±9 years. Psychophysical olfactory test (Sniffin' Sticks, SS), olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials (oERPs and tERPs), and acoustic rhinometry were used for evaluating the olfactory function and nasal structure in patients and healthy controls. SPSS 17.0 software was used to compare the difference in olfactory function and nasal structure between the two groups and to analyze the factors related postoperative olfactory dysfunction. Results: There was a significant difference in the scores on psychophysical olfactory test between the patients and controls (10.78±3.90 vs. 33.66±2.42, t=-23.35, P<0.001). ERPs could be evoked in all patients and controls. Patients showed higher amplitudes of N1 waves in both oERPs and tERPs than controls (P<0.05 for all), but no differences in the latencies of N1 and P2 waves or in the amplitudes of P2 waves were observed between the two groups (P>0.05 for all). There was no difference in nasal structure between the two groups (P>0.05). However, after nasal decongestant, mucosal congestion in the cross-sectional area (CSA) from the nostril to 6 cm level was found more significantly in patients than controls (nasal congestion index 40.00% vs. 1.00%, t=2.09, P=0.047). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing nasal volumes, increasing nasal threshold and anterior nasal turbinate plane CSA(P<0.05 for all). Conclusion: The important factor related to olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty may be attributed to local mucosal congestion, rather than nasal structural alteration or neurophysiologic deficits in the olfactory pathway.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信