EXPRESS:参与努力提高了人工耳蜗使用者口语识别的效率。

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Sarah E Colby, Bob McMurray
{"title":"EXPRESS:参与努力提高了人工耳蜗使用者口语识别的效率。","authors":"Sarah E Colby, Bob McMurray","doi":"10.1177/17470218251325145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Word recognition is generally thought to be supported by an automatic process of lexical competition, at least in normal hearing young adults. When listening becomes challenging, either due to properties of the environment (noise) or the individual (hearing loss), the dynamics of lexical competition change and word recognition can feel effortful and fatiguing. In cochlear implant users, several dimensions of lexical competition have been identified that capture the timing of the onset of lexical competition (<i>Wait-and-See</i>), the degree to which competition is fully resolved (<i>Sustained Activation</i>), and how quickly lexical candidates are activated (<i>Activation Rate</i>). It is unclear, however, how these dimensions relate to listening effort. To address this question, a group of cochlear implant users (<i>N</i> = 79) completed a pupillometry task to index effort and a Visual World Paradigm task to index the dynamics of lexical competition as part of a larger battery of clinical and experimental tasks. Listeners who engaged more effort, as indexed by peak pupil size difference score, fell lower along the <i>Wait-and-See</i> dimension, suggesting that these listeners are engaging effort to be less <i>Wait-and-See</i> (or to begin the process of lexical competition earlier). Listeners who engaged effort earlier had better word and sentence recognition outcomes. The timing of effort was predicted by age and spectral fidelity, but no audiological or demographic factors predicted peak pupil size difference. The dissociation between the magnitude of engaged effort and the timing of effort suggests they perform different goals for spoken word recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251325145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging effort improves efficiency during spoken word recognition in cochlear implant users.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Colby, Bob McMurray\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251325145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Word recognition is generally thought to be supported by an automatic process of lexical competition, at least in normal hearing young adults. When listening becomes challenging, either due to properties of the environment (noise) or the individual (hearing loss), the dynamics of lexical competition change and word recognition can feel effortful and fatiguing. In cochlear implant users, several dimensions of lexical competition have been identified that capture the timing of the onset of lexical competition (<i>Wait-and-See</i>), the degree to which competition is fully resolved (<i>Sustained Activation</i>), and how quickly lexical candidates are activated (<i>Activation Rate</i>). It is unclear, however, how these dimensions relate to listening effort. To address this question, a group of cochlear implant users (<i>N</i> = 79) completed a pupillometry task to index effort and a Visual World Paradigm task to index the dynamics of lexical competition as part of a larger battery of clinical and experimental tasks. Listeners who engaged more effort, as indexed by peak pupil size difference score, fell lower along the <i>Wait-and-See</i> dimension, suggesting that these listeners are engaging effort to be less <i>Wait-and-See</i> (or to begin the process of lexical competition earlier). Listeners who engaged effort earlier had better word and sentence recognition outcomes. The timing of effort was predicted by age and spectral fidelity, but no audiological or demographic factors predicted peak pupil size difference. The dissociation between the magnitude of engaged effort and the timing of effort suggests they perform different goals for spoken word recognition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251325145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251325145\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251325145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单词识别通常被认为是由词汇竞争的自动过程支持的,至少在听力正常的年轻人中是这样。当听力变得具有挑战性时,无论是由于环境(噪音)还是个人(听力损失),词汇竞争的动态变化和单词识别都会感到费力和疲劳。在人工耳蜗使用者中,词汇竞争的几个维度已经被确定,包括词汇竞争开始的时间(观望),竞争完全解决的程度(持续激活),以及候选词汇被激活的速度(激活率)。然而,目前尚不清楚这些维度与倾听努力之间的关系。为了解决这个问题,一组人工耳蜗使用者(N=79)完成了一项瞳孔测量任务,以索引努力程度,以及一项视觉世界范式任务,以索引词汇竞争的动态,这是一系列临床和实验任务的一部分。根据瞳孔大小差异得分的峰值,付出更多努力的听众在观望维度上的得分较低,这表明这些听众正在努力减少观望(或者更早地开始词汇竞争的过程)。更早投入精力的听众有更好的单词和句子识别结果。努力的时间由年龄和光谱保真度预测,但没有听力学或人口统计学因素预测瞳孔大小的峰值差异。投入努力的大小和努力的时间之间的分离表明,他们在口语单词识别中执行不同的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging effort improves efficiency during spoken word recognition in cochlear implant users.

Word recognition is generally thought to be supported by an automatic process of lexical competition, at least in normal hearing young adults. When listening becomes challenging, either due to properties of the environment (noise) or the individual (hearing loss), the dynamics of lexical competition change and word recognition can feel effortful and fatiguing. In cochlear implant users, several dimensions of lexical competition have been identified that capture the timing of the onset of lexical competition (Wait-and-See), the degree to which competition is fully resolved (Sustained Activation), and how quickly lexical candidates are activated (Activation Rate). It is unclear, however, how these dimensions relate to listening effort. To address this question, a group of cochlear implant users (N = 79) completed a pupillometry task to index effort and a Visual World Paradigm task to index the dynamics of lexical competition as part of a larger battery of clinical and experimental tasks. Listeners who engaged more effort, as indexed by peak pupil size difference score, fell lower along the Wait-and-See dimension, suggesting that these listeners are engaging effort to be less Wait-and-See (or to begin the process of lexical competition earlier). Listeners who engaged effort earlier had better word and sentence recognition outcomes. The timing of effort was predicted by age and spectral fidelity, but no audiological or demographic factors predicted peak pupil size difference. The dissociation between the magnitude of engaged effort and the timing of effort suggests they perform different goals for spoken word recognition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信