乳腺癌患者焦虑轨迹预测模型的建立和验证:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2025-02-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S501127
Xia Li, Ben-Kai Wei, Fan Li, Huan-Huan Yan, Jun Shen
{"title":"乳腺癌患者焦虑轨迹预测模型的建立和验证:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Xia Li, Ben-Kai Wei, Fan Li, Huan-Huan Yan, Jun Shen","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S501127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for short-term post-treatment anxiety trajectories in patients with breast cancer, utilizing baseline patient characteristics and initial anxiety scores to inform precise clinical interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline characteristics were collected from 424 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 30, 2022. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores at admission and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-treatment. Distinct trajectories of SAS score changes were identified and categorized. Variables were screened, and multiple models were developed. The optimal model was identified through comparative analysis, and a nomogram was generated following model simplification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found three distinct trends in the trajectory of anxiety, but we grouped them into two broad categories: gradual reduction of anxiety and persistent anxiety. LM Model was established by logistic regression, and Model 1 and Model 2 were established by Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost) screening variables. The ROC curve areas in the validation set were 0.822 (0.757-0.887), 0.757 (0.680-0.834) and 0.781 (0.710-0.851), respectively. Model comparison, using Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), identified the Lm model as optimal, which underwent further simplification and value assignment. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and Clinical Impact Curve (CIC) analyses confirmed the superiority of model-based interventions over general interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct anxiety trajectories are observed in patients diagnosed with breast cancer during the first 12 months post-treatment. Predictive modeling based on baseline characteristics is feasible although though further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"18 ","pages":"315-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Anxiety Trajectories in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xia Li, Ben-Kai Wei, Fan Li, Huan-Huan Yan, Jun Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PRBM.S501127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for short-term post-treatment anxiety trajectories in patients with breast cancer, utilizing baseline patient characteristics and initial anxiety scores to inform precise clinical interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline characteristics were collected from 424 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 30, 2022. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores at admission and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-treatment. Distinct trajectories of SAS score changes were identified and categorized. Variables were screened, and multiple models were developed. The optimal model was identified through comparative analysis, and a nomogram was generated following model simplification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found three distinct trends in the trajectory of anxiety, but we grouped them into two broad categories: gradual reduction of anxiety and persistent anxiety. LM Model was established by logistic regression, and Model 1 and Model 2 were established by Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost) screening variables. The ROC curve areas in the validation set were 0.822 (0.757-0.887), 0.757 (0.680-0.834) and 0.781 (0.710-0.851), respectively. Model comparison, using Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), identified the Lm model as optimal, which underwent further simplification and value assignment. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and Clinical Impact Curve (CIC) analyses confirmed the superiority of model-based interventions over general interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct anxiety trajectories are observed in patients diagnosed with breast cancer during the first 12 months post-treatment. Predictive modeling based on baseline characteristics is feasible although though further research is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"315-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840338/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S501127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S501127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在建立并验证乳腺癌患者治疗后短期焦虑轨迹的预测模型,利用基线患者特征和初始焦虑评分为精确的临床干预提供信息。方法:收集2021年1月1日至2022年12月30日期间在我院接受手术治疗的424例确诊乳腺癌患者的基线特征。在入院时以及治疗后3、6、9和12个月,使用焦虑自评量表(SAS)评估焦虑水平。SAS评分变化的明显轨迹被识别和分类。筛选变量,建立多个模型。通过对比分析,确定了最优模型,并对模型进行简化生成了模态图。结果:我们在焦虑的轨迹上发现了三种明显的趋势,但我们将它们分为两大类:逐渐减少焦虑和持续焦虑。采用logistic回归建立LM模型,采用随机森林(Random Forest, RF)和极端梯度增强(eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Xgboost)筛选变量建立模型1和模型2。验证集的ROC曲线面积分别为0.822(0.757-0.887)、0.757(0.680-0.834)和0.781(0.710-0.851)。模型比较,采用净重分类改进(NRI)和综合区分改进(IDI),确定Lm模型为最优,并对其进行进一步简化和赋值。决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线(CIC)分析证实了基于模型的干预措施优于一般干预措施。结论:乳腺癌患者在治疗后的前12个月有明显的焦虑轨迹。基于基线特征的预测建模是可行的,尽管需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Anxiety Trajectories in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for short-term post-treatment anxiety trajectories in patients with breast cancer, utilizing baseline patient characteristics and initial anxiety scores to inform precise clinical interventions.

Methods: Baseline characteristics were collected from 424 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 30, 2022. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores at admission and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-treatment. Distinct trajectories of SAS score changes were identified and categorized. Variables were screened, and multiple models were developed. The optimal model was identified through comparative analysis, and a nomogram was generated following model simplification.

Results: We found three distinct trends in the trajectory of anxiety, but we grouped them into two broad categories: gradual reduction of anxiety and persistent anxiety. LM Model was established by logistic regression, and Model 1 and Model 2 were established by Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost) screening variables. The ROC curve areas in the validation set were 0.822 (0.757-0.887), 0.757 (0.680-0.834) and 0.781 (0.710-0.851), respectively. Model comparison, using Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), identified the Lm model as optimal, which underwent further simplification and value assignment. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and Clinical Impact Curve (CIC) analyses confirmed the superiority of model-based interventions over general interventions.

Conclusion: Distinct anxiety trajectories are observed in patients diagnosed with breast cancer during the first 12 months post-treatment. Predictive modeling based on baseline characteristics is feasible although though further research is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信