{"title":"Did wear simulator testing indicate biotribological risk for the ASR hip implant systems prior to market release <i>circa</i> 2004?","authors":"John B Medley","doi":"10.1177/09544119251316423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The DePuy ASR hip implant systems had exceptionally high <i>Cumulative Percent Revision</i> compared with other implants in Australia. This was likely to be the case worldwide and thus the ASR hip implant systems were voluntarily withdrawn by DePuy on August 24, 2010. To avoid such debacles in future implant systems, it is instructive for biotribologists to examine the warnings provided by hip wear simulator testing prior to market release <i>circa</i> 2004. The ASR hip implants had metal-on-metal bearings that had shown some success in other designs. Based on hip wear simulator studies of these designs (mostly having 28 mm diameter heads), a Safe Zone for <i>Wear Rates</i> versus <i>Implantation Time</i> could be defined. However, some of the earlier metal-on-metal designs were wear simulator tested under some harsher clinically relevant conditions. They missed the Safe Zone thus confirming a biotribological risk for ASR hip implant systems. Subsequent analysis after market release of the ASR implants confirmed that the risk had been underestimated. Biotribological risk for new implant designs should be examined rigorously prior to market release.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119251316423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在澳大利亚,与其他植入物相比,DePuy ASR 髋关节植入物系统的累计翻修率特别高。这种情况很可能发生在全世界,因此 DePuy 于 2010 年 8 月 24 日主动撤回了 ASR 髋关节植入系统。为了避免未来的植入系统出现此类故障,生物ribologists 有必要研究一下 2004 年左右上市前髋关节磨损模拟器测试所发出的警告。ASR 髋关节植入物采用金属对金属轴承,这种轴承在其他设计中取得了一定的成功。根据髋关节磨损模拟器对这些设计(大部分具有 28 毫米直径的头部)的研究,可以确定磨损率与植入时间的安全区。然而,一些早期的金属对金属设计是在一些更苛刻的临床相关条件下进行磨损模拟器测试的。这些设计没有达到安全区,因此证实了 ASR 髋关节植入系统存在生物ribological 风险。ASR 植入体上市后的后续分析证实,该风险被低估了。因此,在新植入体投放市场之前,应严格审查其生物分布风险。
Did wear simulator testing indicate biotribological risk for the ASR hip implant systems prior to market release circa 2004?
The DePuy ASR hip implant systems had exceptionally high Cumulative Percent Revision compared with other implants in Australia. This was likely to be the case worldwide and thus the ASR hip implant systems were voluntarily withdrawn by DePuy on August 24, 2010. To avoid such debacles in future implant systems, it is instructive for biotribologists to examine the warnings provided by hip wear simulator testing prior to market release circa 2004. The ASR hip implants had metal-on-metal bearings that had shown some success in other designs. Based on hip wear simulator studies of these designs (mostly having 28 mm diameter heads), a Safe Zone for Wear Rates versus Implantation Time could be defined. However, some of the earlier metal-on-metal designs were wear simulator tested under some harsher clinically relevant conditions. They missed the Safe Zone thus confirming a biotribological risk for ASR hip implant systems. Subsequent analysis after market release of the ASR implants confirmed that the risk had been underestimated. Biotribological risk for new implant designs should be examined rigorously prior to market release.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.