IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200455
Margaret T Gopaul, Sirikanya Chiraroekmongkon, Hamada Hamid Altalib
{"title":"Understanding Patient Referral Practices and Perceptions of Mental Health Professionals Among Neurologists.","authors":"Margaret T Gopaul, Sirikanya Chiraroekmongkon, Hamada Hamid Altalib","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine neurologists' practices in managing mental health care. The study aims to identify gaps in coordination between neurology and mental health care and to assess neurologists' perspectives on integrating mental health services into neurology clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was used, combining survey data and qualitative interviews of key informants. The survey assessed management strategies for psychiatric comorbidities through 3 hypothetical cases and questions regarding referral patterns, accessibility of mental health professionals, and perceived effectiveness of mental health care. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare responses by location (the United States vs international) and specialty (general neurology, subspecialist neurology, and neuropsychiatry).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in follow-up plans (χ<sup>2</sup> = 11.025, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and referral frequency for functional neurologic disorders (χ<sup>2</sup> = 24.943, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed, with US physicians more likely to comanage patients with mental health professionals. US neurologists also report referring patients with psychiatric comorbidities more frequently (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.424, <i>p</i> = 0.038). No significant difference in the accessibility of mental health professionals was reported by location (χ<sup>2</sup> = 1.364, <i>p</i> = 0.968) or specialty (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.939, <i>p</i> = 0.568). Neurologists in the United States were more likely than neurologists from other countries to perceive mental health professionals to be highly effective (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.590, <i>p</i> = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most neurologists favor integrating mental health services within neurology clinics, underscoring the need for better care coordination. Despite the global effort to integrate mental health in primary care, these findings suggest a need to consider alternative models in coordinating mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 2","pages":"e200455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:研究神经科医生在管理精神卫生保健方面的做法。该研究旨在找出神经内科与精神卫生医疗协调方面的差距,并评估神经内科医生对将精神卫生服务纳入神经内科诊所的看法:研究采用混合方法,将调查数据和对主要信息提供者的定性访谈相结合。调查通过 3 个假设病例和有关转诊模式、心理健康专业人员的可及性以及心理健康护理的感知效果等问题,对精神科合并症的管理策略进行评估。对不同地区(美国与国际)和不同专业(普通神经病学、亚专业神经病学和神经精神病学)的回答进行了卡方检验:随访计划(χ2 = 11.025,p = 0.026)和功能性神经紊乱的转诊频率(χ2 = 24.943,p < 0.001)存在显著差异,美国医生更倾向于将患者与精神卫生专业人员共同管理。美国神经科医生也更经常转诊合并精神疾病的患者(χ2 = 8.424,p = 0.038)。不同地区(χ2 = 1.364,p = 0.968)或不同专业(χ2 = 2.939,p = 0.568)的精神卫生专业人员的可及性无明显差异。与其他国家的神经科医生相比,美国的神经科医生更倾向于认为精神卫生专业人员是高效的(χ2 = 8.590,p = 0.035):大多数神经科医生赞成在神经科诊所内整合心理健康服务,这强调了加强护理协调的必要性。尽管全球都在努力将精神卫生服务纳入初级医疗保健,但这些研究结果表明,在协调精神卫生医疗保健方面需要考虑其他模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Patient Referral Practices and Perceptions of Mental Health Professionals Among Neurologists.

Background and objectives: To examine neurologists' practices in managing mental health care. The study aims to identify gaps in coordination between neurology and mental health care and to assess neurologists' perspectives on integrating mental health services into neurology clinics.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining survey data and qualitative interviews of key informants. The survey assessed management strategies for psychiatric comorbidities through 3 hypothetical cases and questions regarding referral patterns, accessibility of mental health professionals, and perceived effectiveness of mental health care. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare responses by location (the United States vs international) and specialty (general neurology, subspecialist neurology, and neuropsychiatry).

Results: Significant differences in follow-up plans (χ2 = 11.025, p = 0.026) and referral frequency for functional neurologic disorders (χ2 = 24.943, p < 0.001) were observed, with US physicians more likely to comanage patients with mental health professionals. US neurologists also report referring patients with psychiatric comorbidities more frequently (χ2 = 8.424, p = 0.038). No significant difference in the accessibility of mental health professionals was reported by location (χ2 = 1.364, p = 0.968) or specialty (χ2 = 2.939, p = 0.568). Neurologists in the United States were more likely than neurologists from other countries to perceive mental health professionals to be highly effective (χ2 = 8.590, p = 0.035).

Discussion: Most neurologists favor integrating mental health services within neurology clinics, underscoring the need for better care coordination. Despite the global effort to integrate mental health in primary care, these findings suggest a need to consider alternative models in coordinating mental health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信