服用脱氢表雄酮可改善体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射妇女的子宫内膜厚度:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Ling Huang, Ying Gao, Shuo Liang, Mei Jiang
{"title":"服用脱氢表雄酮可改善体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射妇女的子宫内膜厚度:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ling Huang, Ying Gao, Shuo Liang, Mei Jiang","doi":"10.1186/s13048-024-01581-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The positive effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on oocyte and embryo quality improvement are often concerned. While the results on DHEA-induced endometrial improvement are controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether DHEA intervention improved endometrial function and reproductive outcomes during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and to thus provide clinical recommendations.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science from database inception to 31 July 2024, without language restrictions. The references of conference proceedings and websites on clinical trials were manually checked.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Parallel-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) design; women underwent IVF/ICSI, patients in the experimental group received adminstration with DHEA, whereas the control group received with or without placebo; and the outcomes included reproductive or endometrial function.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>RCTs evaluating the effects of DHEA on IVF/ICSI outcomes were included. Risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed by random-effects or fixed-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to find sources of heterogeneity. Trial sequential analysis was used to judge the stability of the outcomes. Trial sequential analysis was used in order to control for random errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 trials included 1973 women. DHEA treatment significantly increased endometrial thickness (MD = 0.93, CI: 0.27 to 1.60; low QoE), which helped improve clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67; low QoE). DHEA administration also increased the quality of oocyte and embryo [including the number of oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.73, CI: 0.36 to 1.10; low QoE), oocytes fertilized (MD = 0.48, CI: 0.10 to 0.87; low QoE), transferred embryos (MD = 0.27, CI: 0.09 to 0.46; very low QoE), and high-quality embryos (MD = 0.65, CI: 0.27 to 1.03; low QoE)]. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that heterogeneity might be related to disease type, ovarian stimulation protocol, and addition time of DHEA treatment. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding the live birth rate/ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and MII oocyte number of DHEA. And no severe adverse effects were observed with DHEA administration. Due to the apparent improvemen in the CPR, women with thin endometrium might benefit from DHEA cotreament.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the limited sample size and methodological problems, the QoE was low to very low; hence, the results should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of DHEA requires more research before it can be considered for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42023428885.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administration of dehydroepiandrosterone improves endometrial thickness in women undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ling Huang, Ying Gao, Shuo Liang, Mei Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13048-024-01581-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The positive effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on oocyte and embryo quality improvement are often concerned. While the results on DHEA-induced endometrial improvement are controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether DHEA intervention improved endometrial function and reproductive outcomes during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and to thus provide clinical recommendations.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science from database inception to 31 July 2024, without language restrictions. The references of conference proceedings and websites on clinical trials were manually checked.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Parallel-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) design; women underwent IVF/ICSI, patients in the experimental group received adminstration with DHEA, whereas the control group received with or without placebo; and the outcomes included reproductive or endometrial function.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>RCTs evaluating the effects of DHEA on IVF/ICSI outcomes were included. Risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed by random-effects or fixed-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to find sources of heterogeneity. Trial sequential analysis was used to judge the stability of the outcomes. Trial sequential analysis was used in order to control for random errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 trials included 1973 women. DHEA treatment significantly increased endometrial thickness (MD = 0.93, CI: 0.27 to 1.60; low QoE), which helped improve clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67; low QoE). DHEA administration also increased the quality of oocyte and embryo [including the number of oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.73, CI: 0.36 to 1.10; low QoE), oocytes fertilized (MD = 0.48, CI: 0.10 to 0.87; low QoE), transferred embryos (MD = 0.27, CI: 0.09 to 0.46; very low QoE), and high-quality embryos (MD = 0.65, CI: 0.27 to 1.03; low QoE)]. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that heterogeneity might be related to disease type, ovarian stimulation protocol, and addition time of DHEA treatment. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding the live birth rate/ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and MII oocyte number of DHEA. And no severe adverse effects were observed with DHEA administration. Due to the apparent improvemen in the CPR, women with thin endometrium might benefit from DHEA cotreament.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the limited sample size and methodological problems, the QoE was low to very low; hence, the results should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of DHEA requires more research before it can be considered for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42023428885.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01581-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01581-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)对改善卵母细胞和胚胎质量的积极作用一直受到关注。而dhea诱导的子宫内膜改善结果存在争议。目的:评价DHEA干预是否能改善体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期中子宫内膜功能和生殖结局,从而为临床提供建议。数据来源:PubMed, Cochrane图书馆,EMBASE和Web of Science从数据库建立到2024年7月31日,无语言限制。人工查阅会议论文集和临床试验网站的参考文献。研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析。研究资格标准:平行对照随机对照试验(rct)设计;接受IVF/ICSI的妇女,实验组患者接受DHEA,而对照组患者接受或不接受安慰剂;结果包括生殖功能或子宫内膜功能。研究评价和综合方法:纳入评估DHEA对IVF/ICSI结果影响的随机对照试验。偏倚风险和证据质量(QoE)根据Cochrane协作工具和分级推荐评估、发展和评价系统进行评估。采用随机效应或固定效应模型评估95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)和平均差异(MDs)。采用亚组和元回归分析来寻找异质性的来源。采用试验序贯分析来判断结果的稳定性。试验序贯分析用于控制随机误差。结果:共16项试验包括1973名妇女。DHEA治疗显著增加子宫内膜厚度(MD = 0.93, CI: 0.27 ~ 1.60;低QoE),有助于提高临床妊娠率(CPR) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08 ~ 1.67;体验质量低)。DHEA处理也提高了卵母细胞和胚胎的质量[包括获得的卵母细胞数量](MD = 0.73, CI: 0.36 ~ 1.10;低QoE),卵母细胞受精(MD = 0.48, CI: 0.10 ~ 0.87;低QoE),移植胚胎(MD = 0.27, CI: 0.09 ~ 0.46;极低QoE)和高质量胚胎(MD = 0.65, CI: 0.27 ~ 1.03;低体验质量)]。亚组和荟萃回归分析显示,异质性可能与疾病类型、卵巢刺激方案和DHEA治疗的添加时间有关。关于DHEA的活产率/持续妊娠率、流产率和MII卵母细胞数尚无足够的证据得出结论。DHEA组未见严重不良反应。由于心肺复苏术的明显改善,子宫内膜薄的妇女可能从脱氢表雄酮治疗中受益。结论:由于样本量有限和方法学问题,QoE较低至极低;因此,应该谨慎地解释这些结果。脱氢表雄酮的有效性需要更多的研究,然后才能考虑用于临床实践。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42023428885。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Administration of dehydroepiandrosterone improves endometrial thickness in women undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The positive effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on oocyte and embryo quality improvement are often concerned. While the results on DHEA-induced endometrial improvement are controversial.

Objective: To evaluate whether DHEA intervention improved endometrial function and reproductive outcomes during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and to thus provide clinical recommendations.

Data sources: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science from database inception to 31 July 2024, without language restrictions. The references of conference proceedings and websites on clinical trials were manually checked.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study eligibility criteria: Parallel-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) design; women underwent IVF/ICSI, patients in the experimental group received adminstration with DHEA, whereas the control group received with or without placebo; and the outcomes included reproductive or endometrial function.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: RCTs evaluating the effects of DHEA on IVF/ICSI outcomes were included. Risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed by random-effects or fixed-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to find sources of heterogeneity. Trial sequential analysis was used to judge the stability of the outcomes. Trial sequential analysis was used in order to control for random errors.

Results: A total of 16 trials included 1973 women. DHEA treatment significantly increased endometrial thickness (MD = 0.93, CI: 0.27 to 1.60; low QoE), which helped improve clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67; low QoE). DHEA administration also increased the quality of oocyte and embryo [including the number of oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.73, CI: 0.36 to 1.10; low QoE), oocytes fertilized (MD = 0.48, CI: 0.10 to 0.87; low QoE), transferred embryos (MD = 0.27, CI: 0.09 to 0.46; very low QoE), and high-quality embryos (MD = 0.65, CI: 0.27 to 1.03; low QoE)]. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that heterogeneity might be related to disease type, ovarian stimulation protocol, and addition time of DHEA treatment. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding the live birth rate/ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and MII oocyte number of DHEA. And no severe adverse effects were observed with DHEA administration. Due to the apparent improvemen in the CPR, women with thin endometrium might benefit from DHEA cotreament.

Conclusions: Due to the limited sample size and methodological problems, the QoE was low to very low; hence, the results should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of DHEA requires more research before it can be considered for clinical practice.

Prospero registration: CRD42023428885.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信