{"title":"机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术中肠系膜上动脉左后入路。","authors":"Sho Kiritani, Yosuke Inoue, Takafumi Sato, Yui Sawa, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Hiromichi Ito, Yu Takahashi","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (<i>n</i> = 42) and late (<i>n</i> = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; <i>p</i> < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; <i>p</i> = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; <i>p</i> = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (<i>p</i> = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; <i>p</i> = .35).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":"32 4","pages":"317-326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy\",\"authors\":\"Sho Kiritani, Yosuke Inoue, Takafumi Sato, Yui Sawa, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Hiromichi Ito, Yu Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (<i>n</i> = 42) and late (<i>n</i> = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; <i>p</i> < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; <i>p</i> = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; <i>p</i> = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (<i>p</i> = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; <i>p</i> = .35).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"317-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在壶腹周围癌的胰十二指肠切除术中,动脉优先的概念是肠系膜上动脉(SMA)周围的完全剥离是至关重要的。在机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)中,左后路(LP)入路可能是有效的,但其技术可行性和临床结果的数据有限。方法:回顾性分析83例采用LP入路的RPD患者,将其分为早期组(n = 42)和晚期组(n = 41),评估手术成熟度。在切除的第一阶段开始LP入路,通过结扎胰十二指肠下动脉(IPDA)实现从左侧和后侧面的周向SMA剥离和早期血管控制。比较两组患者术后短期疗效。结果:晚期组手术时间明显缩短(518 vs 626 min;结论:根据大约80例RPD病例的经验,LP入路能够精确分离SMA并早期控制血管。机器人手术提供的稳定和超放大的尾侧视野对这种方法特别有利。
A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy
Background
A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (n = 42) and late (n = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results
The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; p < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; p = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; p = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (p = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; p = .35).
Conclusions
With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.