机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术中肠系膜上动脉左后入路。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sho Kiritani, Yosuke Inoue, Takafumi Sato, Yui Sawa, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Hiromichi Ito, Yu Takahashi
{"title":"机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术中肠系膜上动脉左后入路。","authors":"Sho Kiritani,&nbsp;Yosuke Inoue,&nbsp;Takafumi Sato,&nbsp;Yui Sawa,&nbsp;Kosuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Atsushi Oba,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Ono,&nbsp;Hiromichi Ito,&nbsp;Yu Takahashi","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (<i>n</i> = 42) and late (<i>n</i> = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; <i>p</i> &lt; .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; <i>p</i> = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; <i>p</i> = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (<i>p</i> = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; <i>p</i> = .35).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":"32 4","pages":"317-326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy\",\"authors\":\"Sho Kiritani,&nbsp;Yosuke Inoue,&nbsp;Takafumi Sato,&nbsp;Yui Sawa,&nbsp;Kosuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Atsushi Oba,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Ono,&nbsp;Hiromichi Ito,&nbsp;Yu Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (<i>n</i> = 42) and late (<i>n</i> = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; <i>p</i> &lt; .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; <i>p</i> = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; <i>p</i> = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (<i>p</i> = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; <i>p</i> = .35).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"317-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在壶腹周围癌的胰十二指肠切除术中,动脉优先的概念是肠系膜上动脉(SMA)周围的完全剥离是至关重要的。在机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)中,左后路(LP)入路可能是有效的,但其技术可行性和临床结果的数据有限。方法:回顾性分析83例采用LP入路的RPD患者,将其分为早期组(n = 42)和晚期组(n = 41),评估手术成熟度。在切除的第一阶段开始LP入路,通过结扎胰十二指肠下动脉(IPDA)实现从左侧和后侧面的周向SMA剥离和早期血管控制。比较两组患者术后短期疗效。结果:晚期组手术时间明显缩短(518 vs 626 min;结论:根据大约80例RPD病例的经验,LP入路能够精确分离SMA并早期控制血管。机器人手术提供的稳定和超放大的尾侧视野对这种方法特别有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy

A left-posterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (n = 42) and late (n = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; p < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; p = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; p = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (p = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; p = .35).

Conclusions

With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信