多西他赛在her2阴性转移性乳腺癌中的再挑战:一项对先前因非进展原因停用的患者的现实世界研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hui-Ai Zeng, Hui-Min Lv, Meng-Wei Zhang, Li-Min Niu, Jing Wang, Hui-Hui Sun, Zhen-Zhen Liu, Min Yan
{"title":"多西他赛在her2阴性转移性乳腺癌中的再挑战:一项对先前因非进展原因停用的患者的现实世界研究","authors":"Hui-Ai Zeng, Hui-Min Lv, Meng-Wei Zhang, Li-Min Niu, Jing Wang, Hui-Hui Sun, Zhen-Zhen Liu, Min Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06133-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who discontinued docetaxel for reasons other than disease progression.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed HER2-negative MBC patients treated with docetaxel-based therapy (DBT) at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) were used to minimize bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 600 patients, 369 only received docetaxel once (control group), while 231 (38.5%) received docetaxel rechallenge as second or later-line therapy (rechallenge group). In the second-line rechallenge subset (143 patients), ORR was 51.0%, and PFS was 6.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that a response to initial DBT (stable disease [SD] vs. complete response/partial response [CR/PR]: odds ratio [OR] 2.615, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.373-4.981; p = 0.03) independently predicted the ORR. Beyond second-line rechallenge, the ORR and PFS were 37.5% and 5.6 months, respectively. After PSMA, the rechallenge group demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to the control group: 50.5 months vs. 46.0 months (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.632; 95% CI 0.455-0.878; p = 0.006). The toxicities reported were manageable, primarily hematologic, with grade 3-4 events occurring in 19.5% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that docetaxel rechallenge may be an effective and tolerable later-line treatment option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, particularly those who responded to initial DBT. However, further prospective, randomized controlled research is needed to fully evaluate its impact on disease response in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 2","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-world study of previously discontinued patients for non-progression reasons.\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Ai Zeng, Hui-Min Lv, Meng-Wei Zhang, Li-Min Niu, Jing Wang, Hui-Hui Sun, Zhen-Zhen Liu, Min Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06133-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who discontinued docetaxel for reasons other than disease progression.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed HER2-negative MBC patients treated with docetaxel-based therapy (DBT) at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) were used to minimize bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 600 patients, 369 only received docetaxel once (control group), while 231 (38.5%) received docetaxel rechallenge as second or later-line therapy (rechallenge group). In the second-line rechallenge subset (143 patients), ORR was 51.0%, and PFS was 6.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that a response to initial DBT (stable disease [SD] vs. complete response/partial response [CR/PR]: odds ratio [OR] 2.615, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.373-4.981; p = 0.03) independently predicted the ORR. Beyond second-line rechallenge, the ORR and PFS were 37.5% and 5.6 months, respectively. After PSMA, the rechallenge group demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to the control group: 50.5 months vs. 46.0 months (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.632; 95% CI 0.455-0.878; p = 0.006). The toxicities reported were manageable, primarily hematologic, with grade 3-4 events occurring in 19.5% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that docetaxel rechallenge may be an effective and tolerable later-line treatment option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, particularly those who responded to initial DBT. However, further prospective, randomized controlled research is needed to fully evaluate its impact on disease response in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 2\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06133-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06133-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估多西他赛再挑战her2阴性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者因疾病进展以外的原因停用多西他赛的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2010年至2020年在我院接受多西他赛为基础的治疗(DBT)的her2阴性MBC患者。评估客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。采用多变量Cox回归和倾向评分匹配分析(PSMA)来最小化偏倚。结果:600例患者中,369例仅接受一次多西他赛治疗(对照组),231例(38.5%)接受多西他赛二次或后期治疗(再挑战组)。在二线再挑战组(143例)中,ORR为51.0%,PFS为6.7个月。多因素分析显示,对初始DBT的反应(疾病稳定[SD] vs完全缓解/部分缓解[CR/PR]):优势比[OR] 2.615, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.373-4.981;p = 0.03)独立预测ORR。二线再挑战后,ORR和PFS分别为37.5%和5.6个月。PSMA后,与对照组相比,再挑战组的OS显著改善:50.5个月vs 46.0个月(风险比[HR] 0.632;95% ci 0.455-0.878;p = 0.006)。报告的毒性是可控的,主要是血液学,19.5%的病例发生3-4级事件。结论:本研究表明,对于her2阴性MBC患者,特别是那些对初始DBT有反应的患者,多西他赛再挑战可能是一种有效且可耐受的后期治疗选择。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性、随机对照研究来充分评估其对该患者群体疾病反应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-world study of previously discontinued patients for non-progression reasons.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who discontinued docetaxel for reasons other than disease progression.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed HER2-negative MBC patients treated with docetaxel-based therapy (DBT) at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) were used to minimize bias.

Results: Among 600 patients, 369 only received docetaxel once (control group), while 231 (38.5%) received docetaxel rechallenge as second or later-line therapy (rechallenge group). In the second-line rechallenge subset (143 patients), ORR was 51.0%, and PFS was 6.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that a response to initial DBT (stable disease [SD] vs. complete response/partial response [CR/PR]: odds ratio [OR] 2.615, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.373-4.981; p = 0.03) independently predicted the ORR. Beyond second-line rechallenge, the ORR and PFS were 37.5% and 5.6 months, respectively. After PSMA, the rechallenge group demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to the control group: 50.5 months vs. 46.0 months (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.632; 95% CI 0.455-0.878; p = 0.006). The toxicities reported were manageable, primarily hematologic, with grade 3-4 events occurring in 19.5% of cases.

Conclusion: This study suggests that docetaxel rechallenge may be an effective and tolerable later-line treatment option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, particularly those who responded to initial DBT. However, further prospective, randomized controlled research is needed to fully evaluate its impact on disease response in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信