超声诊断外周动脉疾病的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1677-5449.202400332
Silfayner Victor Mathias Dias, Ronald Luiz Gomes Flumignan, Nelson Carvas, Wagner Iared
{"title":"超声诊断外周动脉疾病的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Silfayner Victor Mathias Dias, Ronald Luiz Gomes Flumignan, Nelson Carvas, Wagner Iared","doi":"10.1590/1677-5449.202400332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) is highly prevalent. Current guidelines recommend duplex ultrasound (DUS) with spectral analysis for diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DUS in symptomatic PAD patients. We searched electronic databases for studies comparing DUS and arteriography. Arteries were analyzed individually and grouped into segments (aorto-common femoral, femoropopliteal, below the knee, and the entire lower limb). The meta-analysis estimated sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). Fifteen studies were included, analyzing 9,067 arteries. DUS accuracy for symptomatic PAD was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.78-0.97) for specificity. The best results were observed for the femoropopliteal segment: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90), specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97). The poorest performance was observed for the below-the-knee segment: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.89), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-0.97). Most studies had high and unclear risk of bias. There is significant heterogeneity in results, with a limited number of primary studies for each arterial segment, especially for the below-the-knee segment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14814,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","volume":"24 ","pages":"e20240033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of duplex ultrasound in peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Silfayner Victor Mathias Dias, Ronald Luiz Gomes Flumignan, Nelson Carvas, Wagner Iared\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1677-5449.202400332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) is highly prevalent. Current guidelines recommend duplex ultrasound (DUS) with spectral analysis for diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DUS in symptomatic PAD patients. We searched electronic databases for studies comparing DUS and arteriography. Arteries were analyzed individually and grouped into segments (aorto-common femoral, femoropopliteal, below the knee, and the entire lower limb). The meta-analysis estimated sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). Fifteen studies were included, analyzing 9,067 arteries. DUS accuracy for symptomatic PAD was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.78-0.97) for specificity. The best results were observed for the femoropopliteal segment: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90), specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97). The poorest performance was observed for the below-the-knee segment: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.89), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-0.97). Most studies had high and unclear risk of bias. There is significant heterogeneity in results, with a limited number of primary studies for each arterial segment, especially for the below-the-knee segment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"e20240033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202400332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Vascular Brasileiro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.202400332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)非常普遍。目前的指南推荐双超声(DUS)与光谱分析诊断。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了DUS在有症状的PAD患者中的诊断准确性。我们检索了电子数据库中比较DUS和动脉造影的研究。单独分析动脉,并将其分组(主动脉-股总动脉、股腘动脉、膝下动脉和整个下肢动脉)。该荟萃分析估计了敏感性、特异性、可能性和诊断优势比(DOR)。纳入了15项研究,分析了9067条动脉。症状性PAD的DUS敏感性为0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90),特异性为0.95 (95% CI 0.78-0.97)。在股腘段观察到最好的结果:敏感性0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90),特异性0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97)。膝关节以下部位表现最差:敏感性0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.89),特异性0.92 (95% CI 0.78-0.97)。大多数研究的偏倚风险高且不明确。结果存在显著的异质性,对每个动脉段的初步研究数量有限,尤其是对膝盖以下的动脉段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of duplex ultrasound in peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) is highly prevalent. Current guidelines recommend duplex ultrasound (DUS) with spectral analysis for diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DUS in symptomatic PAD patients. We searched electronic databases for studies comparing DUS and arteriography. Arteries were analyzed individually and grouped into segments (aorto-common femoral, femoropopliteal, below the knee, and the entire lower limb). The meta-analysis estimated sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). Fifteen studies were included, analyzing 9,067 arteries. DUS accuracy for symptomatic PAD was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.90) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.78-0.97) for specificity. The best results were observed for the femoropopliteal segment: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90), specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97). The poorest performance was observed for the below-the-knee segment: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.89), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-0.97). Most studies had high and unclear risk of bias. There is significant heterogeneity in results, with a limited number of primary studies for each arterial segment, especially for the below-the-knee segment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Jornal Vascular Brasileiro is editated and published quaterly to select and disseminate high-quality scientific contents concerning original research, novel surgical and diagnostic techniques, and clinical observations in the field of vascular surgery, angiology, and endovascular surgery. Its abbreviated title is J. Vasc. Bras., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信