下颌支短双侧矢状劈开截骨内固定:力学评价。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nilton Pires de Araújo Filho, Daniel Santiago Vale, Alann Thaffarell Portilho Souza, Alexandre Meireles Borba, Gileade Pereira Freitas, Helena Bacha Lopes
{"title":"下颌支短双侧矢状劈开截骨内固定:力学评价。","authors":"Nilton Pires de Araújo Filho,&nbsp;Daniel Santiago Vale,&nbsp;Alann Thaffarell Portilho Souza,&nbsp;Alexandre Meireles Borba,&nbsp;Gileade Pereira Freitas,&nbsp;Helena Bacha Lopes","doi":"10.1111/eos.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated in vitro three internal fixation methods for short bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandibular ramus using polyurethane replicas. After simulating an 8-mm mandible advancement with a counterclockwise rotation of 6° to the occlusal plane, the short BSSO was fixed bilaterally by using: (i) three linear bicortical screws; (ii) one miniplate with four monocortical screws and one bicortical screw (hybrid system); and (iii) two miniplates with eight monocortical screws. The load was measured on the central incisors or first molars bilaterally at the displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test. In addition, a linear regression analysis with dummy variables was performed for each combination of displacement and loading point. There were no statistically significant differences in the loads applied to both central incisors and first molars bilaterally among fixation methods at 1-mm displacement. However, the necessary load was larger for the two miniplates method for 3-, 5-, and 7-mm displacements. Considering the biomechanical aspects and the cost benefit related to the fixation materials, using three linear bicortical screws or a hybrid system may be more favorable than employing two miniplates with eight monocortical screws.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"133 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal fixation of short bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: A mechanical evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Nilton Pires de Araújo Filho,&nbsp;Daniel Santiago Vale,&nbsp;Alann Thaffarell Portilho Souza,&nbsp;Alexandre Meireles Borba,&nbsp;Gileade Pereira Freitas,&nbsp;Helena Bacha Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eos.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluated in vitro three internal fixation methods for short bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandibular ramus using polyurethane replicas. After simulating an 8-mm mandible advancement with a counterclockwise rotation of 6° to the occlusal plane, the short BSSO was fixed bilaterally by using: (i) three linear bicortical screws; (ii) one miniplate with four monocortical screws and one bicortical screw (hybrid system); and (iii) two miniplates with eight monocortical screws. The load was measured on the central incisors or first molars bilaterally at the displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test. In addition, a linear regression analysis with dummy variables was performed for each combination of displacement and loading point. There were no statistically significant differences in the loads applied to both central incisors and first molars bilaterally among fixation methods at 1-mm displacement. However, the necessary load was larger for the two miniplates method for 3-, 5-, and 7-mm displacements. Considering the biomechanical aspects and the cost benefit related to the fixation materials, using three linear bicortical screws or a hybrid system may be more favorable than employing two miniplates with eight monocortical screws.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"133 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了三种体外内固定方法用于下颌支短时间双侧矢状劈开截骨术(BSSO)。模拟下颌骨向咬合平面逆时针旋转6°,向前移动8mm后,使用3枚线性双皮质螺钉双侧固定短BSSO;(ii)一个微型钢板,装有四枚单皮质螺钉和一枚双皮质螺钉(混合系统);(3) 2个微型钢板配8个单皮质螺钉。分别在1、3、5、7mm的位移处测量中切牙或第一磨牙两侧的载荷。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验。此外,对每个位移和荷载点组合进行了带虚拟变量的线性回归分析。在位移为1mm的固定方式中,对中切牙和第一磨牙施加的载荷在双侧无统计学差异。然而,对于3-,5-和7-mm位移的两个微型板方法,所需的载荷更大。考虑到生物力学方面和与固定材料相关的成本效益,使用三个线性双皮质螺钉或混合系统可能比使用两个微型钢板和八个单皮质螺钉更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal fixation of short bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: A mechanical evaluation

This study evaluated in vitro three internal fixation methods for short bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandibular ramus using polyurethane replicas. After simulating an 8-mm mandible advancement with a counterclockwise rotation of 6° to the occlusal plane, the short BSSO was fixed bilaterally by using: (i) three linear bicortical screws; (ii) one miniplate with four monocortical screws and one bicortical screw (hybrid system); and (iii) two miniplates with eight monocortical screws. The load was measured on the central incisors or first molars bilaterally at the displacements of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test. In addition, a linear regression analysis with dummy variables was performed for each combination of displacement and loading point. There were no statistically significant differences in the loads applied to both central incisors and first molars bilaterally among fixation methods at 1-mm displacement. However, the necessary load was larger for the two miniplates method for 3-, 5-, and 7-mm displacements. Considering the biomechanical aspects and the cost benefit related to the fixation materials, using three linear bicortical screws or a hybrid system may be more favorable than employing two miniplates with eight monocortical screws.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信