IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Daniel G Kougias, Michael D Southall, Anthony R Scialli, Evren Atillasoy, Sadaff Ejaz, Tammi H Schaeffer, Christopher Chu, Bamidele O Jeminiwa, Andrey Massarsky, Kenneth M Unice, Michael Kovochich
{"title":"A quantitative weight-of-evidence review of preclinical studies examining the potential developmental and reproductive toxicity of acetaminophen.","authors":"Daniel G Kougias, Michael D Southall, Anthony R Scialli, Evren Atillasoy, Sadaff Ejaz, Tammi H Schaeffer, Christopher Chu, Bamidele O Jeminiwa, Andrey Massarsky, Kenneth M Unice, Michael Kovochich","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2446471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We previously developed a quantitative weight-of-evidence (QWoE) framework using prespecified scoring criteria for preclinical acetaminophen data to characterize potential developmental neurotoxicity outcomes with considerations for biological relevance of the response to adverse outcomes and the strength of methods and study design. The current analysis uses this framework to characterize potential developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) outcomes following exposure to acetaminophen. Two-hundred forty-two QWoE entries were documented from <i>in vivo</i> rodent studies identified in 110 publications across five categories: DART endpoints in the context of (1) periadolescent/adulthood (nonpregnancy) exposures; (2) pregnant female exposures; and, for <i>in utero</i> or other developmental exposures, (3) anatomical abnormalities, (4) reproductive development, and (5) other physical development. A mean outcome score and methods score were calculated for 242 QWoE entries. Data analyzed in our framework were of moderate quality showing no consistent evidence of DART in male and female rodents following exposure to acetaminophen at therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic doses. Similar results were found for the individual context- and outcome-related endpoint analyses and as segregated by sex. Overall, this QWoE analysis on the <i>in vivo</i> rodent data demonstrated no consistent evidence of adverse effects following exposure to therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic acetaminophen on development or on the structure and function of the reproductive system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-48"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2024.2446471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们之前开发了一个定量证据权重(QWoE)框架,使用预先指定的对乙酰氨基酚临床前数据评分标准来描述潜在的发育神经毒性结果,并考虑了不良结果反应的生物学相关性以及方法和研究设计的强度。目前的分析采用了这一框架来描述对乙酰氨基酚暴露后可能产生的发育和生殖毒性(DART)结果。110篇出版物中的体内啮齿动物研究记录了242个QWoE条目,涉及五个类别:DART终点包括:(1) 青春期/成年期(非孕期)暴露;(2) 孕期女性暴露;以及子宫内或其他发育期暴露;(3) 解剖异常;(4) 生殖发育;以及 (5) 其他身体发育。我们为 242 个 QWoE 条目计算了平均结果得分和方法得分。在我们的框架中分析的数据质量适中,没有一致的证据表明雌雄啮齿动物在暴露于治疗和/或非系统毒性剂量的对乙酰氨基酚后会出现DART。单个与环境和结果相关的终点分析以及按性别分列的分析结果与此类似。总体而言,对啮齿类动物体内数据进行的 QWoE 分析表明,没有一致的证据表明接触治疗和/或非系统毒性对乙酰氨基酚后会对发育或生殖系统的结构和功能产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A quantitative weight-of-evidence review of preclinical studies examining the potential developmental and reproductive toxicity of acetaminophen.

We previously developed a quantitative weight-of-evidence (QWoE) framework using prespecified scoring criteria for preclinical acetaminophen data to characterize potential developmental neurotoxicity outcomes with considerations for biological relevance of the response to adverse outcomes and the strength of methods and study design. The current analysis uses this framework to characterize potential developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) outcomes following exposure to acetaminophen. Two-hundred forty-two QWoE entries were documented from in vivo rodent studies identified in 110 publications across five categories: DART endpoints in the context of (1) periadolescent/adulthood (nonpregnancy) exposures; (2) pregnant female exposures; and, for in utero or other developmental exposures, (3) anatomical abnormalities, (4) reproductive development, and (5) other physical development. A mean outcome score and methods score were calculated for 242 QWoE entries. Data analyzed in our framework were of moderate quality showing no consistent evidence of DART in male and female rodents following exposure to acetaminophen at therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic doses. Similar results were found for the individual context- and outcome-related endpoint analyses and as segregated by sex. Overall, this QWoE analysis on the in vivo rodent data demonstrated no consistent evidence of adverse effects following exposure to therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic acetaminophen on development or on the structure and function of the reproductive system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信