Danish A. Ahmed, Ronaldo Sousa, Alejandro Bortolus, Ceray Aldemir, Nicole F. Angeli, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, J. Robert Britton, Carlos Cano-Barbacil, Aaron Clark-Ginsberg, Irina Culic, Ross N. Cuthbert, Jaimie Dick, Romina D. Dimarco, Franz Essl, Teun Everts, Emili García-Berthou, Mathew Hauer, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Ulrich Kutschera, Stefano Mammola, Irene Martín-Forés, Olivier Morissette, Martin A. Nuñez, Julian D. Olden, Lucian Pârvulescu, Jan Pergl, David Renault, Axel Eduardo Rico-Sánchez, James C. Russell, Ismael Soto, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Tuğba Uçma Uysal, Hugo Verreycken, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Ryan Wasserman, Priscilla Wehi, Phillip J. Haubrock
{"title":"外来物种引进与人类迁徙的相似之处与差异。","authors":"Danish A. Ahmed, Ronaldo Sousa, Alejandro Bortolus, Ceray Aldemir, Nicole F. Angeli, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, J. Robert Britton, Carlos Cano-Barbacil, Aaron Clark-Ginsberg, Irina Culic, Ross N. Cuthbert, Jaimie Dick, Romina D. Dimarco, Franz Essl, Teun Everts, Emili García-Berthou, Mathew Hauer, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Ulrich Kutschera, Stefano Mammola, Irene Martín-Forés, Olivier Morissette, Martin A. Nuñez, Julian D. Olden, Lucian Pârvulescu, Jan Pergl, David Renault, Axel Eduardo Rico-Sánchez, James C. Russell, Ismael Soto, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Tuğba Uçma Uysal, Hugo Verreycken, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Ryan Wasserman, Priscilla Wehi, Phillip J. Haubrock","doi":"10.1111/brv.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"100 3","pages":"1365-1395"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration\",\"authors\":\"Danish A. Ahmed, Ronaldo Sousa, Alejandro Bortolus, Ceray Aldemir, Nicole F. Angeli, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, J. Robert Britton, Carlos Cano-Barbacil, Aaron Clark-Ginsberg, Irina Culic, Ross N. Cuthbert, Jaimie Dick, Romina D. Dimarco, Franz Essl, Teun Everts, Emili García-Berthou, Mathew Hauer, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Ulrich Kutschera, Stefano Mammola, Irene Martín-Forés, Olivier Morissette, Martin A. Nuñez, Julian D. Olden, Lucian Pârvulescu, Jan Pergl, David Renault, Axel Eduardo Rico-Sánchez, James C. Russell, Ismael Soto, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Tuğba Uçma Uysal, Hugo Verreycken, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Ryan Wasserman, Priscilla Wehi, Phillip J. Haubrock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"100 3\",\"pages\":\"1365-1395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.70004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.70004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.70004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration
Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.