外来物种引进与人类迁徙的相似之处与差异。

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Danish A. Ahmed, Ronaldo Sousa, Alejandro Bortolus, Ceray Aldemir, Nicole F. Angeli, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, J. Robert Britton, Carlos Cano-Barbacil, Aaron Clark-Ginsberg, Irina Culic, Ross N. Cuthbert, Jaimie Dick, Romina D. Dimarco, Franz Essl, Teun Everts, Emili García-Berthou, Mathew Hauer, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Ulrich Kutschera, Stefano Mammola, Irene Martín-Forés, Olivier Morissette, Martin A. Nuñez, Julian D. Olden, Lucian Pârvulescu, Jan Pergl, David Renault, Axel Eduardo Rico-Sánchez, James C. Russell, Ismael Soto, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Tuğba Uçma Uysal, Hugo Verreycken, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Ryan Wasserman, Priscilla Wehi, Phillip J. Haubrock
{"title":"外来物种引进与人类迁徙的相似之处与差异。","authors":"Danish A. Ahmed,&nbsp;Ronaldo Sousa,&nbsp;Alejandro Bortolus,&nbsp;Ceray Aldemir,&nbsp;Nicole F. Angeli,&nbsp;Dagmara Błońska,&nbsp;Elizabeta Briski,&nbsp;J. Robert Britton,&nbsp;Carlos Cano-Barbacil,&nbsp;Aaron Clark-Ginsberg,&nbsp;Irina Culic,&nbsp;Ross N. Cuthbert,&nbsp;Jaimie Dick,&nbsp;Romina D. Dimarco,&nbsp;Franz Essl,&nbsp;Teun Everts,&nbsp;Emili García-Berthou,&nbsp;Mathew Hauer,&nbsp;Antonín Kouba,&nbsp;Melina Kourantidou,&nbsp;Ulrich Kutschera,&nbsp;Stefano Mammola,&nbsp;Irene Martín-Forés,&nbsp;Olivier Morissette,&nbsp;Martin A. Nuñez,&nbsp;Julian D. Olden,&nbsp;Lucian Pârvulescu,&nbsp;Jan Pergl,&nbsp;David Renault,&nbsp;Axel Eduardo Rico-Sánchez,&nbsp;James C. Russell,&nbsp;Ismael Soto,&nbsp;Ali Serhan Tarkan,&nbsp;Tuğba Uçma Uysal,&nbsp;Hugo Verreycken,&nbsp;Lorenzo Vilizzi,&nbsp;Ryan Wasserman,&nbsp;Priscilla Wehi,&nbsp;Phillip J. Haubrock","doi":"10.1111/brv.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"100 3","pages":"1365-1395"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration\",\"authors\":\"Danish A. Ahmed,&nbsp;Ronaldo Sousa,&nbsp;Alejandro Bortolus,&nbsp;Ceray Aldemir,&nbsp;Nicole F. Angeli,&nbsp;Dagmara Błońska,&nbsp;Elizabeta Briski,&nbsp;J. Robert Britton,&nbsp;Carlos Cano-Barbacil,&nbsp;Aaron Clark-Ginsberg,&nbsp;Irina Culic,&nbsp;Ross N. Cuthbert,&nbsp;Jaimie Dick,&nbsp;Romina D. Dimarco,&nbsp;Franz Essl,&nbsp;Teun Everts,&nbsp;Emili García-Berthou,&nbsp;Mathew Hauer,&nbsp;Antonín Kouba,&nbsp;Melina Kourantidou,&nbsp;Ulrich Kutschera,&nbsp;Stefano Mammola,&nbsp;Irene Martín-Forés,&nbsp;Olivier Morissette,&nbsp;Martin A. Nuñez,&nbsp;Julian D. Olden,&nbsp;Lucian Pârvulescu,&nbsp;Jan Pergl,&nbsp;David Renault,&nbsp;Axel Eduardo Rico-Sánchez,&nbsp;James C. Russell,&nbsp;Ismael Soto,&nbsp;Ali Serhan Tarkan,&nbsp;Tuğba Uçma Uysal,&nbsp;Hugo Verreycken,&nbsp;Lorenzo Vilizzi,&nbsp;Ryan Wasserman,&nbsp;Priscilla Wehi,&nbsp;Phillip J. Haubrock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"100 3\",\"pages\":\"1365-1395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.70004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.70004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.70004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于社会经济驱动因素和环境因素加强了文化、经济和地理上的联系,生物入侵和人类迁徙在全球范围内不断增加。这两个过程都涉及物种的移动、建立和传播,但却在根本不同的哲学、社会和生物背景下展开。因此,研究生物入侵(入侵科学)和人类迁徙(迁徙研究)呈现出复杂的相似之处,这可能是富有成效的探索。在此,我们结合历史、社会政治和伦理视角,研究了这两种现象之间细微的相似之处和不同之处。我们的综述强调了在政策制定和治理方面需要采取因地制宜的方法,以有效应对人类迁徙和生物入侵所带来的挑战和机遇。我们认为,研究生物入侵和人类迁徙驱动因素的方法为跨学科研究提供了一个极好的机会;一个承认两个研究领域的复杂性和潜在见解的机会。最终,自然科学与社会科学的结合为丰富对入侵生物学和移民动态的理解,同时寻求公正、公平和可持续的解决方案提供了一条大有可为的途径。然而,虽然人类迁徙是生物入侵的一个明显驱动因素,但借鉴生物入侵的原理来理解过去和现在的人类迁徙,有可能过于简单化,并有可能造成有害的概括,从而无视人类迁徙的固有权利和文化动态。通过这样做,我们提供了见解和框架,以支持根据具体情况制定政策,尊重人的尊严,促进文化多样性,并以促进全球合作和正义的方式应对移民挑战。这种跨学科方法凸显了跨学科研究的潜力,承认了两个领域的复杂性,最终丰富了我们对入侵生物学和移民动态的理解,同时寻求公平和可持续的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration

Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信