泛欧洲滑坡风险评估:从理论到实践

IF 25.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Francesco Caleca, Luigi Lombardo, Stefan Steger, Hakan Tanyas, Federico Raspini, Ashok Dahal, Constantinos Nefros, Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint, Vincent Drouin, Mateja Jemec-Auflič, Alessandro Novellino, Marj Tonini, Marco Loche, Nicola Casagli, Veronica Tofani
{"title":"泛欧洲滑坡风险评估:从理论到实践","authors":"Francesco Caleca,&nbsp;Luigi Lombardo,&nbsp;Stefan Steger,&nbsp;Hakan Tanyas,&nbsp;Federico Raspini,&nbsp;Ashok Dahal,&nbsp;Constantinos Nefros,&nbsp;Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint,&nbsp;Vincent Drouin,&nbsp;Mateja Jemec-Auflič,&nbsp;Alessandro Novellino,&nbsp;Marj Tonini,&nbsp;Marco Loche,&nbsp;Nicola Casagli,&nbsp;Veronica Tofani","doi":"10.1029/2023RG000825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessing landslide risk is a fundamental requirement to plan suitable prevention actions. To date, most risk studies focus on individual slopes or catchments. Whereas regional, national or continental scale assessments are hardly available because of methodological and/or data limitations. In this contribution, we present an overview of all requirements and limitations in landslide risk studies across all spatial scales, by means of a hybrid form that combines elements of original research with the comprehensive characteristics of a review study. The review critically analyses each component in the landslide risk analysis providing a detailed explanation of their state-of-the-art, with dedicated sections on susceptibility, hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. To put the theoretical framework to test, we also dive into a case study, expressed at the continental scale. Specifically, we take the main European mountain ranges and provide the reader with a textbook example of risk assessment for such a large territory. In doing so, we take into account issues associated with cross-national differences in landslide mapping. As a result, we identify landslide-prone European landscape and explore the associated possible economic consequences (human settlements and agricultural areas). We also analyze the population at risk during daytime and nighttime. Moreover, a modern view of the problem is explored in the form of how risk outcomes should be delivered to master planners and geoscientific personnel alike. Specifically, we convert our output into an interactive Web Application (https://pan-european-landslide-risk.github.io/) to include notions of scientific communication both to a large public as well as to a technical audience.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023RG000825","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pan-European Landslide Risk Assessment: From Theory to Practice\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Caleca,&nbsp;Luigi Lombardo,&nbsp;Stefan Steger,&nbsp;Hakan Tanyas,&nbsp;Federico Raspini,&nbsp;Ashok Dahal,&nbsp;Constantinos Nefros,&nbsp;Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint,&nbsp;Vincent Drouin,&nbsp;Mateja Jemec-Auflič,&nbsp;Alessandro Novellino,&nbsp;Marj Tonini,&nbsp;Marco Loche,&nbsp;Nicola Casagli,&nbsp;Veronica Tofani\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023RG000825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Assessing landslide risk is a fundamental requirement to plan suitable prevention actions. To date, most risk studies focus on individual slopes or catchments. Whereas regional, national or continental scale assessments are hardly available because of methodological and/or data limitations. In this contribution, we present an overview of all requirements and limitations in landslide risk studies across all spatial scales, by means of a hybrid form that combines elements of original research with the comprehensive characteristics of a review study. The review critically analyses each component in the landslide risk analysis providing a detailed explanation of their state-of-the-art, with dedicated sections on susceptibility, hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. To put the theoretical framework to test, we also dive into a case study, expressed at the continental scale. Specifically, we take the main European mountain ranges and provide the reader with a textbook example of risk assessment for such a large territory. In doing so, we take into account issues associated with cross-national differences in landslide mapping. As a result, we identify landslide-prone European landscape and explore the associated possible economic consequences (human settlements and agricultural areas). We also analyze the population at risk during daytime and nighttime. Moreover, a modern view of the problem is explored in the form of how risk outcomes should be delivered to master planners and geoscientific personnel alike. Specifically, we convert our output into an interactive Web Application (https://pan-european-landslide-risk.github.io/) to include notions of scientific communication both to a large public as well as to a technical audience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews of Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023RG000825\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews of Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023RG000825\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023RG000825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估滑坡风险是规划适当的预防措施的基本要求。迄今为止,大多数风险研究都集中在个别斜坡或集水区。由于方法和(或)数据的限制,很难获得区域、国家或大陆规模的评估。在这篇文章中,我们通过将原始研究的元素与综述研究的综合特征相结合的混合形式,概述了所有空间尺度上滑坡风险研究的所有要求和限制。该综述对滑坡风险分析中的每个组成部分进行了批判性分析,提供了其最新技术的详细解释,并专门介绍了易感性、危害、暴露和脆弱性。为了检验理论框架,我们还深入研究了一个在大陆尺度上表达的案例研究。具体来说,我们以欧洲的主要山脉为例,为读者提供了一个教科书式的风险评估的例子。在这样做时,我们考虑到与滑坡测绘的跨国差异有关的问题。因此,我们确定了容易发生山体滑坡的欧洲景观,并探讨了相关的可能的经济后果(人类住区和农业区)。我们还分析了白天和夜间的高危人群。此外,本书还探讨了如何将风险结果传递给总体规划者和地球科学人员等方面的问题。具体地说,我们将输出转换为交互式Web应用程序(https://pan-european-landslide-risk.github.io/),以包括向广大公众和技术受众进行科学交流的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pan-European Landslide Risk Assessment: From Theory to Practice

Pan-European Landslide Risk Assessment: From Theory to Practice

Assessing landslide risk is a fundamental requirement to plan suitable prevention actions. To date, most risk studies focus on individual slopes or catchments. Whereas regional, national or continental scale assessments are hardly available because of methodological and/or data limitations. In this contribution, we present an overview of all requirements and limitations in landslide risk studies across all spatial scales, by means of a hybrid form that combines elements of original research with the comprehensive characteristics of a review study. The review critically analyses each component in the landslide risk analysis providing a detailed explanation of their state-of-the-art, with dedicated sections on susceptibility, hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. To put the theoretical framework to test, we also dive into a case study, expressed at the continental scale. Specifically, we take the main European mountain ranges and provide the reader with a textbook example of risk assessment for such a large territory. In doing so, we take into account issues associated with cross-national differences in landslide mapping. As a result, we identify landslide-prone European landscape and explore the associated possible economic consequences (human settlements and agricultural areas). We also analyze the population at risk during daytime and nighttime. Moreover, a modern view of the problem is explored in the form of how risk outcomes should be delivered to master planners and geoscientific personnel alike. Specifically, we convert our output into an interactive Web Application (https://pan-european-landslide-risk.github.io/) to include notions of scientific communication both to a large public as well as to a technical audience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews of Geophysics
Reviews of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics Reviews (ROG) offers comprehensive overviews and syntheses of current research across various domains of the Earth and space sciences. Our goal is to present accessible and engaging reviews that cater to the diverse AGU community. While authorship is typically by invitation, we warmly encourage readers and potential authors to share their suggestions with our editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信