基于DEIAJ要素的高校图书馆政策审查:政策审查工具的开发与应用

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Kawanna M. Bright , Yoko Okunishi
{"title":"基于DEIAJ要素的高校图书馆政策审查:政策审查工具的开发与应用","authors":"Kawanna M. Bright ,&nbsp;Yoko Okunishi","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policies in academic libraries, whether formal or informal, external or internal, carry high levels of importance for the functioning of the library. But history and experience have shown that library policies are not always written for the benefit of everyone, and may negatively impact some library users and employees, especially those from marginalized or historically excluded populations. Until recently, very little focus has been given to review of academic library policies from a diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or justice (DEIAJ) perspective. This case study focuses on the process utilized to develop, test, and apply a tool to reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements. The process identified several insights, focusing on key elements of policy development either not fully addressed or in need of updates, including understanding who created and reviewed policies, when reviews were taking place, the need for a structured process, and awareness of subjectiveness. Recommended best practices in policy development and review are also shared. This case study supports academic libraries interested in engaging in policy review and identifying an approach and tool that will work for their contextual needs by thoroughly mapping out the process followed by the California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) University Library and sharing the review tool for wider use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 103024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements: Development and application of a policy review tool\",\"authors\":\"Kawanna M. Bright ,&nbsp;Yoko Okunishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Policies in academic libraries, whether formal or informal, external or internal, carry high levels of importance for the functioning of the library. But history and experience have shown that library policies are not always written for the benefit of everyone, and may negatively impact some library users and employees, especially those from marginalized or historically excluded populations. Until recently, very little focus has been given to review of academic library policies from a diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or justice (DEIAJ) perspective. This case study focuses on the process utilized to develop, test, and apply a tool to reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements. The process identified several insights, focusing on key elements of policy development either not fully addressed or in need of updates, including understanding who created and reviewed policies, when reviews were taking place, the need for a structured process, and awareness of subjectiveness. Recommended best practices in policy development and review are also shared. This case study supports academic libraries interested in engaging in policy review and identifying an approach and tool that will work for their contextual needs by thoroughly mapping out the process followed by the California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) University Library and sharing the review tool for wider use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 103024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000205\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术图书馆的政策,无论是正式的还是非正式的,外部的还是内部的,对图书馆的运作都具有很高的重要性。但历史和经验表明,图书馆政策并不总是为了每个人的利益而制定的,可能会对一些图书馆用户和员工产生负面影响,特别是那些来自边缘化或历史上被排斥的人群。直到最近,很少有人关注从多样性、公平、包容、可及性或公正(DEIAJ)的角度来审查学术图书馆政策。本案例研究的重点是用于开发、测试和应用工具的过程,该工具用于审查学术图书馆的DEIAJ元素政策。该过程确定了若干见解,集中于政策制定的关键要素,这些要素要么没有得到充分处理,要么需要更新,包括了解谁制定和审查了政策,何时进行审查,需要一个结构化的过程,以及对主观性的认识。还分享了在政策制定和审查方面建议的最佳做法。本案例研究支持有兴趣参与政策审查的学术图书馆,并通过全面规划加州州立大学多明格斯山分校(CSUDH)大学图书馆遵循的流程,确定适合其上下文需求的方法和工具,并分享审查工具以供更广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements: Development and application of a policy review tool
Policies in academic libraries, whether formal or informal, external or internal, carry high levels of importance for the functioning of the library. But history and experience have shown that library policies are not always written for the benefit of everyone, and may negatively impact some library users and employees, especially those from marginalized or historically excluded populations. Until recently, very little focus has been given to review of academic library policies from a diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or justice (DEIAJ) perspective. This case study focuses on the process utilized to develop, test, and apply a tool to reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements. The process identified several insights, focusing on key elements of policy development either not fully addressed or in need of updates, including understanding who created and reviewed policies, when reviews were taking place, the need for a structured process, and awareness of subjectiveness. Recommended best practices in policy development and review are also shared. This case study supports academic libraries interested in engaging in policy review and identifying an approach and tool that will work for their contextual needs by thoroughly mapping out the process followed by the California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) University Library and sharing the review tool for wider use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信