IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Kuay-Keng Yang
{"title":"Exploring primary school students drawing solutions to problems in STEM activities","authors":"Kuay-Keng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Next Generation School Science framework explicitly notes that the engineering design process should be integrated with science activities (NRC, 2012). Yet, studies on the design of teaching practices have been limited. This study explored the effectiveness of combining the engineering design process with scientific inquiry activity on student problem-solving performance. A quasi-experimental two-group pretest-posttest design was conducted with an experimental group and a comparison group. Experimental group students (<em>n</em> = 16) participated in ten consecutive two-hour after-school lessons with four themes of integrated Scientific Inquiry and Engineering Design Process (i-SI&amp;EDP) activities. Comparison group students (<em>n</em> = 19) attended other free-choice learning activities. Both groups were asked to respond to the engineering-based problem-solving test (EPST) at the beginning and end of the intervention. The analysis of covariance revealed that students in the experimental group scored significantly higher on the engineering-based problem-solving test, specifically in the 'idea creation and design sketching' indicator. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of students' problem-solving drawings suggested that structured and continuous after-school learning activities enhance visual thinking and the ability to conceptualize ideas while considering task constraints and appropriateness for production. As a STEM approach, the findings suggest that the i-SI&amp;EDP shows potential for redesigning teaching and learning within the existing science curriculum to enhance students' problem-solving in engineering-based tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125000392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下一代学校科学框架明确指出,工程设计过程应与科学活动相结合(NRC,2012)。然而,有关教学实践设计的研究却十分有限。本研究探讨了工程设计过程与科学探究活动相结合对学生解决问题能力的影响。研究采用实验组和对比组两组前测后测的准实验设计。实验组学生(n = 16)参加了连续十节两小时的课后课程,其中包含四个主题的综合科学探究和工程设计过程(i-SI&EDP)活动。对比组学生(n = 19)参加了其他自由选择的学习活动。在干预开始和结束时,两组学生都被要求回答以工程为基础的问题解决测试(EPST)。协方差分析表明,实验组学生在基于工程的问题解决测试中得分明显更高,特别是在 "创意和设计草图 "指标上。此外,对学生的问题解决图纸进行的定性分析表明,有组织的、持续的课后学习活动能够提高形象思维和构思能力,同时考虑到任务的限制和生产的适宜性。作为一种 STEM 方法,研究结果表明,i-SI&EDP 具有在现有科学课程中重新设计教与学的潜 力,可提高学生在以工程为基础的任务中解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring primary school students drawing solutions to problems in STEM activities
The Next Generation School Science framework explicitly notes that the engineering design process should be integrated with science activities (NRC, 2012). Yet, studies on the design of teaching practices have been limited. This study explored the effectiveness of combining the engineering design process with scientific inquiry activity on student problem-solving performance. A quasi-experimental two-group pretest-posttest design was conducted with an experimental group and a comparison group. Experimental group students (n = 16) participated in ten consecutive two-hour after-school lessons with four themes of integrated Scientific Inquiry and Engineering Design Process (i-SI&EDP) activities. Comparison group students (n = 19) attended other free-choice learning activities. Both groups were asked to respond to the engineering-based problem-solving test (EPST) at the beginning and end of the intervention. The analysis of covariance revealed that students in the experimental group scored significantly higher on the engineering-based problem-solving test, specifically in the 'idea creation and design sketching' indicator. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of students' problem-solving drawings suggested that structured and continuous after-school learning activities enhance visual thinking and the ability to conceptualize ideas while considering task constraints and appropriateness for production. As a STEM approach, the findings suggest that the i-SI&EDP shows potential for redesigning teaching and learning within the existing science curriculum to enhance students' problem-solving in engineering-based tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信