人类与野生动物的互动:与猴子一起生活在坦桑尼亚Sao-hill森林附近

Q2 Environmental Science
Franco Peniel Mbise
{"title":"人类与野生动物的互动:与猴子一起生活在坦桑尼亚Sao-hill森林附近","authors":"Franco Peniel Mbise","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study assessed the dynamics of human-monkey conflict for communities living adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania, with a particular focus on the factors influencing community perceptions of monkey populations, the effectiveness of crop protection measures, and attitudes towards monkey conservation in a rural setting. Quantitative method was used for data collection through a structured questionnaires targeting farmers and community members (<em>n</em> = 240). The key findings showed that 44.2 % of respondents perceived the monkey population as increasing, while 31.7 % believed it was decreasing, and 15.8 % saw it as stable. Gender and village location significantly influenced these perceptions, with males and residents of specific villages being less likely to perceive population changes. For crop protection, domestic dogs (34.2 %) and cow dung (20.0 %) were perceived as the most effective measures, with significant variations in effectiveness perceptions across different tribes. Regarding reasons for disliking monkeys, 56.7 % of respondents cited crop raiding as the primary issue, followed by property destruction (29.6 %) and attacks on chickens (13.8 %). Males were more likely to express dislike towards monkeys. Conservation suggestions were diverse, with conservation education being the most recommended (36.7 %), followed by fencing farms (25.4 %), and protecting monkey habitats (21.7 %). Village and tribal affiliations significantly influenced these suggestions, with some tribes and villages being less inclined to recommend conservation measures. Therefore, this study underscores the need for gender-sensitive, culturally appropriate, and location-specific conservation strategies to effectively address human-wildlife conflicts and promote sustainable coexistence. The findings provide a foundation for future research aimed at developing tailored interventions that consider the unique demographic and cultural contexts of communities affected by human-wildlife interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human-wildlife interaction: Living with monkeys adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Franco Peniel Mbise\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study assessed the dynamics of human-monkey conflict for communities living adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania, with a particular focus on the factors influencing community perceptions of monkey populations, the effectiveness of crop protection measures, and attitudes towards monkey conservation in a rural setting. Quantitative method was used for data collection through a structured questionnaires targeting farmers and community members (<em>n</em> = 240). The key findings showed that 44.2 % of respondents perceived the monkey population as increasing, while 31.7 % believed it was decreasing, and 15.8 % saw it as stable. Gender and village location significantly influenced these perceptions, with males and residents of specific villages being less likely to perceive population changes. For crop protection, domestic dogs (34.2 %) and cow dung (20.0 %) were perceived as the most effective measures, with significant variations in effectiveness perceptions across different tribes. Regarding reasons for disliking monkeys, 56.7 % of respondents cited crop raiding as the primary issue, followed by property destruction (29.6 %) and attacks on chickens (13.8 %). Males were more likely to express dislike towards monkeys. Conservation suggestions were diverse, with conservation education being the most recommended (36.7 %), followed by fencing farms (25.4 %), and protecting monkey habitats (21.7 %). Village and tribal affiliations significantly influenced these suggestions, with some tribes and villages being less inclined to recommend conservation measures. Therefore, this study underscores the need for gender-sensitive, culturally appropriate, and location-specific conservation strategies to effectively address human-wildlife conflicts and promote sustainable coexistence. The findings provide a foundation for future research aimed at developing tailored interventions that consider the unique demographic and cultural contexts of communities affected by human-wildlife interactions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究评估了生活在坦桑尼亚sao hill森林附近社区的人猴冲突动态,特别关注影响社区对猴子种群的看法、作物保护措施的有效性以及农村环境中对猴子保护的态度的因素。数据收集采用定量方法,通过对农民和社区成员(n = 240)进行结构化问卷调查。主要调查结果显示,44.2%的受访者认为猴子数量在增加,31.7%的受访者认为猴子数量在减少,15.8%的受访者认为猴子数量保持稳定。性别和村庄位置显著影响这些看法,男性和特定村庄的居民不太可能感知到人口变化。在作物保护方面,养狗(34.2%)和牛粪(20.0%)被认为是最有效的措施,不同部落对有效性的看法存在显著差异。至于不喜欢猴子的原因,56.7%的受访者认为主要原因是袭击农作物,其次是破坏财产(29.6%)和袭击鸡(13.8%)。男性更有可能对猴子表示不喜欢。保护建议多种多样,其中保护教育建议最多(36.7%),其次是围栏农场(25.4%)和保护猴子栖息地(21.7%)。村庄和部落的关系对这些建议产生了重大影响,一些部落和村庄不太倾向于建议保护措施。因此,本研究强调需要对性别敏感、文化适宜和特定地点的保护策略,以有效解决人类与野生动物的冲突,促进可持续共存。这些发现为未来的研究提供了基础,这些研究旨在开发量身定制的干预措施,考虑到受人类与野生动物相互作用影响的社区的独特人口和文化背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human-wildlife interaction: Living with monkeys adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania
The study assessed the dynamics of human-monkey conflict for communities living adjacent to Sao-hill Forest in Tanzania, with a particular focus on the factors influencing community perceptions of monkey populations, the effectiveness of crop protection measures, and attitudes towards monkey conservation in a rural setting. Quantitative method was used for data collection through a structured questionnaires targeting farmers and community members (n = 240). The key findings showed that 44.2 % of respondents perceived the monkey population as increasing, while 31.7 % believed it was decreasing, and 15.8 % saw it as stable. Gender and village location significantly influenced these perceptions, with males and residents of specific villages being less likely to perceive population changes. For crop protection, domestic dogs (34.2 %) and cow dung (20.0 %) were perceived as the most effective measures, with significant variations in effectiveness perceptions across different tribes. Regarding reasons for disliking monkeys, 56.7 % of respondents cited crop raiding as the primary issue, followed by property destruction (29.6 %) and attacks on chickens (13.8 %). Males were more likely to express dislike towards monkeys. Conservation suggestions were diverse, with conservation education being the most recommended (36.7 %), followed by fencing farms (25.4 %), and protecting monkey habitats (21.7 %). Village and tribal affiliations significantly influenced these suggestions, with some tribes and villages being less inclined to recommend conservation measures. Therefore, this study underscores the need for gender-sensitive, culturally appropriate, and location-specific conservation strategies to effectively address human-wildlife conflicts and promote sustainable coexistence. The findings provide a foundation for future research aimed at developing tailored interventions that consider the unique demographic and cultural contexts of communities affected by human-wildlife interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信