庆大霉素与纯化唾液乳杆菌胞外多糖对生物膜形成及铜绿假单胞菌Rh1I基因表达影响的比较

IF 1 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ayaat H. Abd, Ibtesam Ghadban Auda, Likaa Hamied Mahdi
{"title":"庆大霉素与纯化唾液乳杆菌胞外多糖对生物膜形成及铜绿假单胞菌Rh1I基因表达影响的比较","authors":"Ayaat H. Abd,&nbsp;Ibtesam Ghadban Auda,&nbsp;Likaa Hamied Mahdi","doi":"10.1016/j.genrep.2025.102164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antibiotics have long been the only option to treat infections and biofilm inhibition. Still, in recent decades' researchers have begun to look for alternatives to them, and this study is one of the studies that look for alternatives to antibiotics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of purified <em>Lactobacillus salivarius</em> Exopolysaccharides (EPS) on the gene expression of the <em>rhlI</em> Quorum sensing gene of <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> compared with gentamicin. The highest L. <em>salivarius</em> isolates EPS production was used for isolation and purification of EPS. The sub-MIC of EPS and gentamicin was determined and used to inhibit both <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> biofilm and <em>rh1I</em> gene expression. The results revealed that OD of the biofilm before treatment is significantly higher (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) in the <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates than after gentamicin treatment and after purified EPS treatment. Moreover, the biofilm inhibition with EPS treatment was significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) more efficient than gentamicin treatment. The <em>rh1l</em> gene expression in <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates after EPS sub-MIC treatment was decreased more than after gentamicin sub-MIC treatment. Depending on the results obtained, the EPS may be considered, after the performance of some toxicological tests (like MTT assay, in vivo effect of the EPS and histopathological effect), as a possible alternative to some systemic or topical antibiotics or perhaps as a preservative instead of a chemical preservative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12673,"journal":{"name":"Gene Reports","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 102164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the effect of gentamicin and purified Lactobacillus salivarius exopolysaccharides on the biofilm formation and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rh1I gene expression\",\"authors\":\"Ayaat H. Abd,&nbsp;Ibtesam Ghadban Auda,&nbsp;Likaa Hamied Mahdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genrep.2025.102164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Antibiotics have long been the only option to treat infections and biofilm inhibition. Still, in recent decades' researchers have begun to look for alternatives to them, and this study is one of the studies that look for alternatives to antibiotics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of purified <em>Lactobacillus salivarius</em> Exopolysaccharides (EPS) on the gene expression of the <em>rhlI</em> Quorum sensing gene of <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> compared with gentamicin. The highest L. <em>salivarius</em> isolates EPS production was used for isolation and purification of EPS. The sub-MIC of EPS and gentamicin was determined and used to inhibit both <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> biofilm and <em>rh1I</em> gene expression. The results revealed that OD of the biofilm before treatment is significantly higher (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) in the <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates than after gentamicin treatment and after purified EPS treatment. Moreover, the biofilm inhibition with EPS treatment was significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) more efficient than gentamicin treatment. The <em>rh1l</em> gene expression in <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates after EPS sub-MIC treatment was decreased more than after gentamicin sub-MIC treatment. Depending on the results obtained, the EPS may be considered, after the performance of some toxicological tests (like MTT assay, in vivo effect of the EPS and histopathological effect), as a possible alternative to some systemic or topical antibiotics or perhaps as a preservative instead of a chemical preservative.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gene Reports\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gene Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452014425000378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452014425000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,抗生素一直是治疗感染和生物膜抑制的唯一选择。尽管如此,近几十年来,研究人员已经开始寻找抗生素的替代品,而这项研究是寻找抗生素替代品的研究之一。本研究旨在比较纯化的唾液乳杆菌胞外多糖(EPS)与庆大霉素对铜绿假单胞菌rhlI群体感应基因表达的影响。利用唾液乳杆菌中EPS产量最高的菌株进行EPS的分离纯化。测定了EPS和庆大霉素的亚mic,并利用其抑制铜绿假单胞菌生物膜和rh1I基因表达。结果表明,处理前生物膜的OD显著高于处理前(P <;0.001),与庆大霉素处理和纯化EPS处理相比。此外,EPS处理对生物膜的抑制作用显著(P <;0.001)比庆大霉素治疗更有效。EPS亚mic处理后铜绿假单胞菌rh1l基因表达比庆大霉素亚mic处理后降低的幅度更大。根据获得的结果,在进行了一些毒理学试验(如MTT试验、EPS的体内效应和组织病理学效应)之后,EPS可能被视为某些全身或局部抗生素的可能替代品,或者可能作为防腐剂而不是化学防腐剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between the effect of gentamicin and purified Lactobacillus salivarius exopolysaccharides on the biofilm formation and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rh1I gene expression
Antibiotics have long been the only option to treat infections and biofilm inhibition. Still, in recent decades' researchers have begun to look for alternatives to them, and this study is one of the studies that look for alternatives to antibiotics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of purified Lactobacillus salivarius Exopolysaccharides (EPS) on the gene expression of the rhlI Quorum sensing gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared with gentamicin. The highest L. salivarius isolates EPS production was used for isolation and purification of EPS. The sub-MIC of EPS and gentamicin was determined and used to inhibit both Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and rh1I gene expression. The results revealed that OD of the biofilm before treatment is significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the P. aeruginosa isolates than after gentamicin treatment and after purified EPS treatment. Moreover, the biofilm inhibition with EPS treatment was significantly (P < 0.001) more efficient than gentamicin treatment. The rh1l gene expression in P. aeruginosa isolates after EPS sub-MIC treatment was decreased more than after gentamicin sub-MIC treatment. Depending on the results obtained, the EPS may be considered, after the performance of some toxicological tests (like MTT assay, in vivo effect of the EPS and histopathological effect), as a possible alternative to some systemic or topical antibiotics or perhaps as a preservative instead of a chemical preservative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gene Reports
Gene Reports Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
246
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Gene Reports publishes papers that focus on the regulation, expression, function and evolution of genes in all biological contexts, including all prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, as well as viruses. Gene Reports strives to be a very diverse journal and topics in all fields will be considered for publication. Although not limited to the following, some general topics include: DNA Organization, Replication & Evolution -Focus on genomic DNA (chromosomal organization, comparative genomics, DNA replication, DNA repair, mobile DNA, mitochondrial DNA, chloroplast DNA). Expression & Function - Focus on functional RNAs (microRNAs, tRNAs, rRNAs, mRNA splicing, alternative polyadenylation) Regulation - Focus on processes that mediate gene-read out (epigenetics, chromatin, histone code, transcription, translation, protein degradation). Cell Signaling - Focus on mechanisms that control information flow into the nucleus to control gene expression (kinase and phosphatase pathways controlled by extra-cellular ligands, Wnt, Notch, TGFbeta/BMPs, FGFs, IGFs etc.) Profiling of gene expression and genetic variation - Focus on high throughput approaches (e.g., DeepSeq, ChIP-Seq, Affymetrix microarrays, proteomics) that define gene regulatory circuitry, molecular pathways and protein/protein networks. Genetics - Focus on development in model organisms (e.g., mouse, frog, fruit fly, worm), human genetic variation, population genetics, as well as agricultural and veterinary genetics. Molecular Pathology & Regenerative Medicine - Focus on the deregulation of molecular processes in human diseases and mechanisms supporting regeneration of tissues through pluripotent or multipotent stem cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信