政治问题!政治意愿是执行可持续发展目标的关键条件

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Marianne Beisheim , Muriel Asseburg , Eric J. Ballbach , Karoline Eickhoff , Sabine Fischer , Nadine Godehardt , Gerrit Kurtz , Marcel Meyer , Melanie Müller , Stephan Roll , Astrid Sahm , Christian Wagner , Claudia Zilla
{"title":"政治问题!政治意愿是执行可持续发展目标的关键条件","authors":"Marianne Beisheim ,&nbsp;Muriel Asseburg ,&nbsp;Eric J. Ballbach ,&nbsp;Karoline Eickhoff ,&nbsp;Sabine Fischer ,&nbsp;Nadine Godehardt ,&nbsp;Gerrit Kurtz ,&nbsp;Marcel Meyer ,&nbsp;Melanie Müller ,&nbsp;Stephan Roll ,&nbsp;Astrid Sahm ,&nbsp;Christian Wagner ,&nbsp;Claudia Zilla","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While commentaries often bemoan the lack of political will to “transform our world”, there is little analysis of country-level <em>politics</em> around the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This article aims to fill that gap through assessing the preferences and priorities of governments and local elites, as well as related conflicts around the SDGs. We want to investigate what political elites want to achieve through the SDGs. For this, we build on eleven exploratory country cases: Belarus, Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Kenya, Palestine, Republic of Korea, Russia, South Africa, and Sudan. Alongside specific findings for these countries, the article presents conclusions on the significance of country-level politics for SDG implementation and three clusters of hypotheses for future research. The most prominent finding is governments’ emphasis on (pre-existing) top-priority programmes: Governments seek to make the SDGs serve their political objectives, while leveraging them for greater legitimacy. Other relevant aspects include state fragility and the SDG governance architecture at the national level. The article concludes with a discussion of policy-relevant implications and recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics matters! Political will as a critical condition for implementing the sustainable development goals\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Beisheim ,&nbsp;Muriel Asseburg ,&nbsp;Eric J. Ballbach ,&nbsp;Karoline Eickhoff ,&nbsp;Sabine Fischer ,&nbsp;Nadine Godehardt ,&nbsp;Gerrit Kurtz ,&nbsp;Marcel Meyer ,&nbsp;Melanie Müller ,&nbsp;Stephan Roll ,&nbsp;Astrid Sahm ,&nbsp;Christian Wagner ,&nbsp;Claudia Zilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While commentaries often bemoan the lack of political will to “transform our world”, there is little analysis of country-level <em>politics</em> around the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This article aims to fill that gap through assessing the preferences and priorities of governments and local elites, as well as related conflicts around the SDGs. We want to investigate what political elites want to achieve through the SDGs. For this, we build on eleven exploratory country cases: Belarus, Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Kenya, Palestine, Republic of Korea, Russia, South Africa, and Sudan. Alongside specific findings for these countries, the article presents conclusions on the significance of country-level politics for SDG implementation and three clusters of hypotheses for future research. The most prominent finding is governments’ emphasis on (pre-existing) top-priority programmes: Governments seek to make the SDGs serve their political objectives, while leveraging them for greater legitimacy. Other relevant aspects include state fragility and the SDG governance architecture at the national level. The article concludes with a discussion of policy-relevant implications and recommendations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811625000102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811625000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然评论经常哀叹缺乏“改变世界”的政治意愿,但很少有关于可持续发展目标(SDGs)的国家层面政治分析。本文旨在通过评估政府和地方精英的偏好和优先事项,以及围绕可持续发展目标的相关冲突,填补这一空白。我们想调查政治精英们想通过可持续发展目标实现什么。为此,我们以11个探索性国家案例为基础:白俄罗斯、巴西、中国、埃及、印度、肯尼亚、巴勒斯坦、大韩民国、俄罗斯、南非和苏丹。除了针对这些国家的具体发现外,本文还提出了关于国家层面政治对可持续发展目标实施的重要性的结论,并为未来的研究提供了三组假设。最突出的发现是各国政府对(已有的)最优先项目的重视:各国政府力求使可持续发展目标服务于其政治目标,同时利用这些目标获得更大的合法性。其他相关方面包括国家脆弱性和国家层面的可持续发展目标治理架构。文章最后讨论了与政策相关的影响和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Politics matters! Political will as a critical condition for implementing the sustainable development goals
While commentaries often bemoan the lack of political will to “transform our world”, there is little analysis of country-level politics around the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This article aims to fill that gap through assessing the preferences and priorities of governments and local elites, as well as related conflicts around the SDGs. We want to investigate what political elites want to achieve through the SDGs. For this, we build on eleven exploratory country cases: Belarus, Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Kenya, Palestine, Republic of Korea, Russia, South Africa, and Sudan. Alongside specific findings for these countries, the article presents conclusions on the significance of country-level politics for SDG implementation and three clusters of hypotheses for future research. The most prominent finding is governments’ emphasis on (pre-existing) top-priority programmes: Governments seek to make the SDGs serve their political objectives, while leveraging them for greater legitimacy. Other relevant aspects include state fragility and the SDG governance architecture at the national level. The article concludes with a discussion of policy-relevant implications and recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信