用关键字法由医师直升机运送的过敏反应患者

Q3 Nursing
Chihiro Maekawa MD, Hiroki Nagasawa MD, PhD, Noriko Tanaka MD, Kenji Kawai MD, Michika Hamada MD, Soichiro Ota MD, Hiromichi Ohsaka MD, PhD, Kazuhiko Omori MD, PhD, Youichi Yanagawa MD, PhD
{"title":"用关键字法由医师直升机运送的过敏反应患者","authors":"Chihiro Maekawa MD,&nbsp;Hiroki Nagasawa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Noriko Tanaka MD,&nbsp;Kenji Kawai MD,&nbsp;Michika Hamada MD,&nbsp;Soichiro Ota MD,&nbsp;Hiromichi Ohsaka MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Omori MD, PhD,&nbsp;Youichi Yanagawa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study retrospectively investigated the outcomes of patients with anaphylaxis transported by a staffed doctor helicopter (DH) using the keyword method, based on data from the Japan DH Registry System (JDRS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with anaphylaxis were selected from the JDRS database. Data collected included duration from first call to patient contact, patient demographics, vital signs, timing of DH dispatch request, medical interventions, duration of admission, and outcomes at 1 month. Subjects were divided into keyword (pre-contact) and control (post-contact) groups for comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 688 patients, all were evacuated from the scene, with no interhospital transports. There were no significant differences between the keyword (n = 430) and control (n = 258) groups with regard to age, sex, cardiac arrest on contact, vital signs, rate of medical intervention, and mortality rate. Duration of first call to contact and admission were significantly shorter in the keyword group. The keyword group also had a significantly higher ratio of good outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe the keyword method as a prognostic factor in patients with anaphylaxis transported by DH. Adoption of the keyword method by firefighting central command rooms for the DH dispatch in anaphylaxis cases should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"Pages 70-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients With Anaphylaxis Transported by a Physician-Staffed Helicopter Using the Keyword Method\",\"authors\":\"Chihiro Maekawa MD,&nbsp;Hiroki Nagasawa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Noriko Tanaka MD,&nbsp;Kenji Kawai MD,&nbsp;Michika Hamada MD,&nbsp;Soichiro Ota MD,&nbsp;Hiromichi Ohsaka MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Omori MD, PhD,&nbsp;Youichi Yanagawa MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amj.2024.11.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study retrospectively investigated the outcomes of patients with anaphylaxis transported by a staffed doctor helicopter (DH) using the keyword method, based on data from the Japan DH Registry System (JDRS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with anaphylaxis were selected from the JDRS database. Data collected included duration from first call to patient contact, patient demographics, vital signs, timing of DH dispatch request, medical interventions, duration of admission, and outcomes at 1 month. Subjects were divided into keyword (pre-contact) and control (post-contact) groups for comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 688 patients, all were evacuated from the scene, with no interhospital transports. There were no significant differences between the keyword (n = 430) and control (n = 258) groups with regard to age, sex, cardiac arrest on contact, vital signs, rate of medical intervention, and mortality rate. Duration of first call to contact and admission were significantly shorter in the keyword group. The keyword group also had a significantly higher ratio of good outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe the keyword method as a prognostic factor in patients with anaphylaxis transported by DH. Adoption of the keyword method by firefighting central command rooms for the DH dispatch in anaphylaxis cases should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 70-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24002657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24002657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究基于日本医生直升机(DH)登记系统(JDRS)的数据,采用关键字法回顾性调查由配备人员的医生直升机(DH)运送的过敏反应患者的结果。方法从JDRS数据库中选择有过敏反应的患者。收集的数据包括从第一次呼叫到患者接触的时间、患者人口统计学、生命体征、卫生部调度请求的时间、医疗干预措施、入院时间和1个月时的结果。将受试者分为关键词组(接触前)和对照组(接触后)进行比较。结果688例患者全部从现场撤离,无院内转运。关键词组(n = 430)与对照组(n = 258)在年龄、性别、接触时心脏骤停、生命体征、医疗干预率和死亡率方面无显著差异。关键词组的第一次联系电话和入院时间明显缩短。关键词组的良好结果比例也显著高于关键词组。结论据我们所知,本研究首次将关键词法描述为DH转运过敏反应患者的预后因素。应考虑消防中央指挥室对过敏反应病例的DH调度采用关键词法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients With Anaphylaxis Transported by a Physician-Staffed Helicopter Using the Keyword Method

Objective

This study retrospectively investigated the outcomes of patients with anaphylaxis transported by a staffed doctor helicopter (DH) using the keyword method, based on data from the Japan DH Registry System (JDRS).

Methods

Patients with anaphylaxis were selected from the JDRS database. Data collected included duration from first call to patient contact, patient demographics, vital signs, timing of DH dispatch request, medical interventions, duration of admission, and outcomes at 1 month. Subjects were divided into keyword (pre-contact) and control (post-contact) groups for comparison.

Results

Of 688 patients, all were evacuated from the scene, with no interhospital transports. There were no significant differences between the keyword (n = 430) and control (n = 258) groups with regard to age, sex, cardiac arrest on contact, vital signs, rate of medical intervention, and mortality rate. Duration of first call to contact and admission were significantly shorter in the keyword group. The keyword group also had a significantly higher ratio of good outcomes.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe the keyword method as a prognostic factor in patients with anaphylaxis transported by DH. Adoption of the keyword method by firefighting central command rooms for the DH dispatch in anaphylaxis cases should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信